saying there must be this, or there must be that is NOT evidence nor a discovery but wishful thinking.
Just as saying that if someone had fed my body through a woodchipper I wouldn't still be alive is "NOT evidence nor a discovery but wishful thinking".
Y'know, archaeologist, when you have to abolish the scientific method in order to cling to your delusions, that's a sign that you're
wrong.
you cannot prove a bottleneck for civilization started with 8 people and there is NO evidence prior to that time that would produce the graph you want.
I bet if that was coherent it would be untrue.
the scant amount of old bodies/skeletons we do find will not be sufficient for such a study. thus your call for genetical bottlenecks is unrealistic.
Perhaps you should try to find out how genetic bottlenecks are actually identified. Here's a hint: it has nothing to do with "old bodies/skeletons" and a lot more to do with equilibrium heterozygosity.
Now i am thinking of the pakistani flood that has taken place recently. this is a good example of why Noah's flood was global and did take place. NO ONE puts a destructive local flood into their identity, religious works, or makes it a life changing event.
Excuse me, have you ever looked at the immense amount of trivia that
is included in your own holy book?
There's a whole book of the Bible about some guy suffering from painful boils. One's heart goes out to him, but surely there have been more significant historical events.
Noah's flood is real and those who claim otherwise are just deceiving themselves.
And yet in the course of your brief but entertaining stay on these forums it is you who have tended to be hopelessly, ridiculously wrong about pretty much everything.
By the way, are you ever going to produce that evidence that ancient Minoans had microscopes?
So I think the possibility that
you are deceiving
yourself is markedly more likely.