Its an incredibly harsh way to detail morality.
Neither myself or Phat has done as such. He was using those terms to define evil for his statement that people are inherently good and evil.
I believe that people are both good and evil. Evil in this case defined as selfish, greedy, or uncaring of others needs.
Leaving aside semantic arguments, i went ahead and called his description of evil part of a larger description of morality. Im not sure where you take offense to this.
As taken from the dictionary for "morality":
quote:
conformity to the rules of right conduct; moral or virtuous conduct.
If Phat is describing the wrong conduct, he is describing part of morality. I judged the way the he described it as harsh.
™ Version 4.2
