Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
5 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,912 Year: 4,169/9,624 Month: 1,040/974 Week: 367/286 Day: 10/13 Hour: 1/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Making Sense of Evil (Virginia Tech Massacre)
hooah212002
Member (Idle past 831 days)
Posts: 3193
Joined: 08-12-2009


Message 104 of 110 (587579)
10-19-2010 3:35 PM
Reply to: Message 103 by Phat
10-19-2010 3:26 PM


Re: Evil?
I believe that people are both good and evil. Evil in this case defined as selfish, greedy, or uncaring of others needs.
IF that were the case, I don't think human children would last very long seeing as no one would care for them. You have to admit that caring for children takes A LOT of self sacrifice. Sure, there are evil people out there, but to say that people are pre-destined to be evil (in the sense you mentioned) doesn't seem to add up. At least not to me, anyways.
Secondly, I can't even agree that those are actually evil qualities. I don't tend to think of someone who is greedy as being evil, I don't tend to think of someone who is selfish as evil. Nor do I think of someone who is uncaring as evil. Perhaps some more hardcore offshoots of those qualities, yes. But by themselves evil? Na, I don't think so.
I believe that people are both good and evil.
I believe that people are generally "meh" about the whole thing: neither good nor evil.

"What can be asserted without proof, can be dismissed without proof."-Hitch.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 103 by Phat, posted 10-19-2010 3:26 PM Phat has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 105 by Damouse, posted 10-20-2010 6:22 PM hooah212002 has replied

  
hooah212002
Member (Idle past 831 days)
Posts: 3193
Joined: 08-12-2009


Message 106 of 110 (587786)
10-20-2010 7:19 PM
Reply to: Message 105 by Damouse
10-20-2010 6:22 PM


Re: Evil?
Im not sure what you meant when you said that, hooah.
When I said what?
quote:
selfish, greedy, or uncaring
Those are harsh terms?

"What can be asserted without proof, can be dismissed without proof."-Hitch.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 105 by Damouse, posted 10-20-2010 6:22 PM Damouse has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 107 by Damouse, posted 10-20-2010 7:30 PM hooah212002 has replied

  
hooah212002
Member (Idle past 831 days)
Posts: 3193
Joined: 08-12-2009


Message 108 of 110 (587788)
10-20-2010 7:34 PM
Reply to: Message 107 by Damouse
10-20-2010 7:30 PM


Re: Evil?
Its an incredibly harsh way to detail morality.
Neither myself or Phat has done as such. He was using those terms to define evil for his statement that people are inherently good and evil.

"What can be asserted without proof, can be dismissed without proof."-Hitch.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 107 by Damouse, posted 10-20-2010 7:30 PM Damouse has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 109 by Damouse, posted 10-20-2010 7:45 PM hooah212002 has replied

  
hooah212002
Member (Idle past 831 days)
Posts: 3193
Joined: 08-12-2009


Message 110 of 110 (587790)
10-20-2010 7:55 PM
Reply to: Message 109 by Damouse
10-20-2010 7:45 PM


Re: Evil?
Leaving aside semantic arguments, i went ahead and called his description of evil part of a larger description of morality. Im not sure where you take offense to this.
Ok, I gotcha now.

"What can be asserted without proof, can be dismissed without proof."-Hitch.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 109 by Damouse, posted 10-20-2010 7:45 PM Damouse has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024