|
Register | Sign In |
|
QuickSearch
Thread ▼ Details |
iceage  Suspended Member (Idle past 5946 days) Posts: 1024 From: Pacific Northwest Joined: |
Thread Info
|
|
|
Author | Topic: Seashells on tops of mountains. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Panda Member (Idle past 3744 days) Posts: 2688 From: UK Joined: |
Possessor writes:
The 'shells' can rise with the water, but they can't descend with the water. So the shells rise with the water because certain organisims can only live so deep in the water,and then when the water goes down they are left stranded on the mountain.Why is that? Can they only swim up? If I were you And I wish that I were you All the things I'd do To make myself turn blue
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
jar Member (Idle past 425 days) Posts: 34026 From: Texas!! Joined: |
Are you claiming that you have never seen oyster beds rise and fall with the tides?
Sheesh; Have you ever even considered the evidence? Young inexperienced seashells obviously could climb up never to return.
quote: Anyone so limited that they can only spell a word one way is severely handicapped!
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Panda Member (Idle past 3744 days) Posts: 2688 From: UK Joined:
|
quote:Yes, clearly they If I were you And I wish that I were you All the things I'd do To make myself turn blue
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dr Adequate Member (Idle past 315 days) Posts: 16113 Joined: |
It is true that they got there because of the flood.Now this happend because the water had to rise above the highest point on earth so there was no escape from death.So the shells rise with the water because certain organisims can only live so deep in the water,and then when the water goes down they are left stranded on the mountain. In the mountain. They are in the rocks, not just on the surface. As to how oyster beds and coral reefs climb mountains, you have not proposed any details and I'd like to see you try. And having climbed up, as you claim, why couldn't they climb down again?
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Possessor Junior Member (Idle past 4554 days) Posts: 19 Joined: |
Well it's just like when it rains.The ground absorbes it.And probaly made some lakes and rivers biger and even made some new ones.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Panda Member (Idle past 3744 days) Posts: 2688 From: UK Joined: |
Possessor writes:
The ground doesn't just absorb water. Well it's just like when it rains.The ground absorbes it.If the ground just absorbed water then after only a few heavy rainstorms the whole world would be covered in mud. Instead the excess water normally flows through the ground and into the rivers and eventually the sea. But if the whole planet was flooded then it couldn't flow anywhere. Possessor writes:
There weren't any lakes or rivers: the whole planet was covered in water. And probaly made some lakes and rivers biger and even made some new ones. If I were you And I wish that I were you All the things I'd do To make myself turn blue
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Possessor Junior Member (Idle past 4554 days) Posts: 19 Joined: |
yes,very good the earth was coverd in water,but as the water wen't back down it made the past rivers and stuff biger or even made new ones.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Panda Member (Idle past 3744 days) Posts: 2688 From: UK Joined: |
Possessor writes:
but as the water wen't back down it made the past rivers and stuff biger or even made new ones.Panda writes: Instead the excess water normally flows through the ground and into the rivers and eventually the sea.But if the whole planet was flooded then it couldn't flow anywhere. Edited by Panda, : No reason given. Edited by Panda, : No reason given.If I were you And I wish that I were you All the things I'd do To make myself turn blue
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dr Adequate Member (Idle past 315 days) Posts: 16113 Joined: |
I think he's talking about what would happen at the end of the flood when the waters receeded. Though I'm not sure he's thought it through very carefully.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Panda Member (Idle past 3744 days) Posts: 2688 From: UK Joined: |
Dr. A writes:
He said that the ground absorbed the water. I think he's talking about what would happen at the end of the flood when the waters receeded.But when told that the ground doesn't just absorb water he claimed it went into the rivers. I am hoping he will see that water can't flow into the rivers when the planet is flooded because the rivers would be 'full'.
Dr. A writes:
Maybe he will, if encouraged. Though I'm not sure he's thought it through very carefully. Edited by Panda, : No reason given. Edited by Panda, : No reason given. Edited by Panda, : No reason given.If I were you And I wish that I were you All the things I'd do To make myself turn blue
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Bailey Member (Idle past 4401 days) Posts: 574 From: Earth Joined: |
I feel like there's a problem with your explanation, and it's this: where did the water go? If there's enough water on Earth to cover all mountains, then there's no way to move it around such that it doesn't keep covering all mountains.
Crash, you can't be serious - the flood obviously watered the mountains, causing them to grow to safety. One Love
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Coragyps Member (Idle past 765 days) Posts: 5553 From: Snyder, Texas, USA Joined: |
Bailey, you win the Internets for today!!!!
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
subbie Member (Idle past 1285 days) Posts: 3509 Joined: |
My only question is, where do you get doobies with filters?
Ridicule is the only weapon which can be used against unintelligible propositions. -- Thomas Jefferson We see monsters where science shows us windmills. -- Phat It has always struck me as odd that fundies devote so much time and effort into trying to find a naturalistic explanation for their mythical flood, while looking for magical explanations for things that actually happened. -- Dr. Adequate ...creationists have a great way to detect fraud and it doesn't take 8 or 40 years or even a scientific degree to spot the fraud--'if it disagrees with the bible then it is wrong'.... -- archaeologist
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Huntard Member (Idle past 2326 days) Posts: 2870 From: Limburg, The Netherlands Joined: |
Possessor writes:
What do you mean "went back down"? Down to where? There's nowhere for the water to go, since, you know, the entire planet is covered with it. yes,very good the earth was coverd in water,but as the water wen't back down it made the past rivers and stuff biger or even made new ones. Welcome to EvC, by the way.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Robert Byers Member (Idle past 4399 days) Posts: 640 From: Toronto,canada Joined: |
The biblical flood would not sort things like modern rivers etc.
This is a great chaos of immense powerful water. Its sorting is by slabs as big as counties. not by critters. if the k-t line is the flood line then there would not be such a fauna mixture. The world before was not the world after.
|
|
|
Do Nothing Button
Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved
Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024