Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
7 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,913 Year: 4,170/9,624 Month: 1,041/974 Week: 368/286 Day: 11/13 Hour: 1/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Seashells on tops of mountains.
Buzsaw
Inactive Member


Message 23 of 343 (425706)
10-03-2007 8:51 PM
Reply to: Message 17 by ringo
10-03-2007 7:07 PM


Re: hi, first post
TheWay writes:
... the flood doctrine usually states that mountains were formed after the flood.
Ringo writes:
Like most of creationism, that's totally unBiblical.
Gen 7:19 And the waters prevailed exceedingly upon the earth; and all the high hills, that were under the whole heaven, were covered.
Gen 7:20 Fifteen cubits upward did the waters prevail; and the mountains were covered.
First the text says that the waters prevailed upon the "high hills." Then the "mountains" were covered.
Moving on to Psalms 104:6,7 we read that the earth was covered with "the deep" and "the waters stood above the mountains." Psalms 104:7 the waters go away. Thunder is mentioned here, likely a first as was the rainbow (as per Genesis) In Psalms 108 we read of the mountains rising up (likely to much higher elevations and the valleys sinking down. So the lower mountains (hills) rose up after being covered by the deep and the valleys sank down, likely forming the deeper oceans which now cover some 70% of the earth's surface. This all likely after the rains stopped. As the valleys/oceans etc sank the mountain ranges rose giving the effect of waters receeding and dry land appearing. Likely evaporation was only one of the means causing the waters to receed and dry land to appear.
Ringo writes:
There were mountains before the flood. The question would be: How did seashells get to the tops of those mountains (in multiple layers)?
They likely rose up with the mountains since the above series of texts indicates lower mountains/hills before the flood, taking less water to cover the earth than by the elevation of mountains which we observe. Perhaps (I say 'perhaps) the massive faulting, sliding and movement of terrain via breaking natural dams and so forth layered fossil beds.
I'm applying logic and reason to the Biblical historical record and applying it to what is observed as well for what it's worth. To me all of the varied manifestations of corroborating evidence relative to the Biblical record renders it of significant worth. To you, most assuredly not from what we read of you.
Edited by Buzsaw, : Rephrase for clarity

BUZSAW B 4 U 2 C Y BUZ SAW.
The immeasurable present is forever consuming the eternal future and extending the infinite past.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 17 by ringo, posted 10-03-2007 7:07 PM ringo has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 24 by NosyNed, posted 10-03-2007 9:01 PM Buzsaw has replied
 Message 25 by Cold Foreign Object, posted 10-03-2007 9:03 PM Buzsaw has replied
 Message 36 by ringo, posted 10-04-2007 1:08 AM Buzsaw has replied
 Message 38 by iceage, posted 10-04-2007 1:49 AM Buzsaw has not replied

  
Buzsaw
Inactive Member


Message 26 of 343 (425711)
10-03-2007 9:10 PM


Tectonic Plate Movement
Imo, since the ocean crusts average much thinner than the continental crusts by about 6 or 7 times thinner, likely the massive flood waters flowing to the lower thinner crust valleys caused a great amount of tectonic movement of both the larger 7 plates and the more numerous smaller plates causing tectonic plate collisions and uplift etc. This activity would no doubt do a great deal of mountain forming including the larger ranges which tend to be near the coastlines of the oceans, imo making flood sense.

BUZSAW B 4 U 2 C Y BUZ SAW.
The immeasurable present is forever consuming the eternal future and extending the infinite past.

Replies to this message:
 Message 37 by Nuggin, posted 10-04-2007 1:48 AM Buzsaw has replied
 Message 45 by RAZD, posted 10-04-2007 7:13 AM Buzsaw has not replied

  
Buzsaw
Inactive Member


Message 27 of 343 (425714)
10-03-2007 9:19 PM
Reply to: Message 24 by NosyNed
10-03-2007 9:01 PM


Re: moutains
NosyNed writes:
please quote the exact text Buz. Thanks.
Psalms 104:6-9
ASV Text writes:
Thou coveredst it with the deep as with a vesture; The waters stood above the mountains. At thy rebuke they fled; At the voice of thy thunder they hasted away (The mountains rose, the valleys sank down) Unto the place which thou hadst founded for them. Thou hast set a bound that they may not pass over; That they turn not again to cover the earth. --Psalm 104:6-9 (ASV)

BUZSAW B 4 U 2 C Y BUZ SAW.
The immeasurable present is forever consuming the eternal future and extending the infinite past.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 24 by NosyNed, posted 10-03-2007 9:01 PM NosyNed has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 44 by Dr Jack, posted 10-04-2007 5:55 AM Buzsaw has not replied

  
Buzsaw
Inactive Member


Message 29 of 343 (425717)
10-03-2007 9:32 PM
Reply to: Message 24 by NosyNed
10-03-2007 9:01 PM


Re: Seashells
NoseyNed writes:
The mountains raising does not, in any case, explain what we see. If you think it does explain, first, your understanding of the facts about the seashells and then, in some detail, how they got there.
As I said about all I can offer is logic and reasoning which I have done regarding the seashell.
Other than that, I remember finding petrified sea squib at my dad's ranch back in the 1950s (at about the 6000' elevation) on the Shoshoni Indian Reservation near Lander Wyo where I grew up in the foothills of the Wind River Range. The U of Missouri also had a geology fossil camp at about the 10,000' elevation just above where my dad's ranch was. I don't know what all they found in those fossil beds. The reason I know the things on the ranch were petrified sea squib is because I took some samples into Lander and was informed so by a trained geologist. These were shaped like the tip of a deer antler and about an inch and a half to two inches long as I recall. There were a lot of them to be found on the ranch acerage there. Back then a white could lease Indian land if no Indians opted for the lease.

BUZSAW B 4 U 2 C Y BUZ SAW.
The immeasurable present is forever consuming the eternal future and extending the infinite past.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 24 by NosyNed, posted 10-03-2007 9:01 PM NosyNed has not replied

  
Buzsaw
Inactive Member


Message 30 of 343 (425718)
10-03-2007 9:43 PM
Reply to: Message 25 by Cold Foreign Object
10-03-2007 9:03 PM


Re: Fountains of the Deep
CFO writes:
Have we forgotten that not only was the vapor canopy torn asunder causing torrential catastrophic rain, but the fountains of the deep were released pushing upward.
I'm not sure what effect the releasing of the subterranian waters would have. Logically, perhaps the sinking of the valleys by the massive weight of the flood water exerted pressure on the earth's surface in the lower areas to effect this.
Yes, I agree also about the disintegration of the vapor canopy. Thus the first rains, rainbow and thunder etc.

BUZSAW B 4 U 2 C Y BUZ SAW.
The immeasurable present is forever consuming the eternal future and extending the infinite past.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 25 by Cold Foreign Object, posted 10-03-2007 9:03 PM Cold Foreign Object has not replied

  
Buzsaw
Inactive Member


Message 32 of 343 (425735)
10-03-2007 10:47 PM
Reply to: Message 31 by Chiroptera
10-03-2007 9:56 PM


Re: Uniformitarian
Chiroptera writes:
In fact, if someone is going to propose that the universe was different in the past than it is today, then that someone is going to have to propose some specific ways in which it was different.
As per the thread topic, more important is whether a preflood planet earth as well as it's atmosphere would have been different than it is today. Imo that is the big question as to the accuracy of dating methodology.

BUZSAW B 4 U 2 C Y BUZ SAW.
The immeasurable present is forever consuming the eternal future and extending the infinite past.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 31 by Chiroptera, posted 10-03-2007 9:56 PM Chiroptera has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 35 by sidelined, posted 10-03-2007 11:30 PM Buzsaw has replied
 Message 39 by PaulK, posted 10-04-2007 2:09 AM Buzsaw has not replied
 Message 41 by Dr Adequate, posted 10-04-2007 2:41 AM Buzsaw has not replied
 Message 47 by RAZD, posted 10-04-2007 7:23 AM Buzsaw has not replied

  
Buzsaw
Inactive Member


Message 62 of 343 (426259)
10-05-2007 8:17 PM
Reply to: Message 35 by sidelined
10-03-2007 11:30 PM


Re: Dating Methodology
sidelined writes:
I am going to ask you to clarify what effect you think a pre flood earth and its atmosphere could have upon dating methodologies.
Using logic and reasoning all I can offer as a layman is that a greenhouse canopy type atmosphere would have had different properties than ours which would likely affect the whole ecosystem of the planet which in turn would likely render modern dating methodoly inaccurate. This would likely be the reason that humans lived multiple century lives as per the Biblical record.

BUZSAW B 4 U 2 C Y BUZ SAW.
The immeasurable present is forever consuming the eternal future and extending the infinite past.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 35 by sidelined, posted 10-03-2007 11:30 PM sidelined has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 65 by jar, posted 10-05-2007 8:36 PM Buzsaw has replied
 Message 81 by PaulK, posted 10-06-2007 5:39 AM Buzsaw has not replied
 Message 82 by Dr Adequate, posted 10-06-2007 6:56 AM Buzsaw has not replied
 Message 87 by sidelined, posted 10-06-2007 9:53 AM Buzsaw has not replied
 Message 89 by Discreet Label, posted 10-06-2007 2:11 PM Buzsaw has not replied
 Message 98 by Lithodid-Man, posted 10-07-2007 6:33 AM Buzsaw has not replied

  
Buzsaw
Inactive Member


Message 63 of 343 (426261)
10-05-2007 8:27 PM
Reply to: Message 36 by ringo
10-04-2007 1:08 AM


Mountains lower
Ringo, if the mountains rose as per Psalms 108 that means they were lower before they rose as per the ASV Bible which imo is the most accurate having been translated from the older manuscripts than the KJV.
Btw, being a layman, usage of the word "likely" is my disclaimer, so as not to be accused of acting like a know-it-all.
Abe: We Bible-creos must be doubly careful, you know with the vast majority ever watchful for anything to nail us on.
Edited by Buzsaw, : Add Sentence.

BUZSAW B 4 U 2 C Y BUZ SAW.
The immeasurable present is forever consuming the eternal future and extending the infinite past.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 36 by ringo, posted 10-04-2007 1:08 AM ringo has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 64 by jar, posted 10-05-2007 8:33 PM Buzsaw has replied
 Message 80 by iceage, posted 10-06-2007 12:51 AM Buzsaw has not replied

  
Buzsaw
Inactive Member


Message 66 of 343 (426271)
10-05-2007 9:21 PM
Reply to: Message 37 by Nuggin
10-04-2007 1:48 AM


Re: "Flood sense"
Nuggin writes:
I like this term of yours "Flood sense". I think I'll use it.
So, Buz, your hypothesis is that all the worlds big mountain ranges (particularly those with shells in and on them) were formed during the Flood.
Therefore, they should all the same age.
Thus, they should all have the same types of fossils on/in them.
And, those comprised of the same materials should show the exact same amount of erosion.
Right? I mean, that all makes sense. I don't know if it makes "Flood sense"
Hi Nuggin. I checked around and see that this problem arises with both ideologies. I found a site which may offer some reasons for dating variations relative to contamination within the same fossil beds. The following paragraph is taken from the site but there's a lot more at the site relative to this:
The Galley Hill Skeleton was found 8 feet deep in gravels at Swanscombe, Kent, in 1888. The gravels are Middle Pleistocene, that is to say of early palaeolithic age; and there has been a long con[2]troversy as to whether the human bones had been naturally buried in the gravels when they were laid down by the Thames, a quarter of a million years ago, or whether they had been buried artificially at a comparatively recent date. We collected a number of fossil animal bones from these early palaeolithic gravels, a number from later palaeolithic (i.e. Upper Pleistocene) deposits in neighbouring pits, and some from recent deposits, including part of a Saxon skeleton. These were analysed in the Government Laboratory and it was found that all the undoubted early palaeolithic bones contained around 2 per cent. fluorine, the later palaeolithic around 1 per cent., and those from recent deposits 0.3 per cent. or less, down to 0.05 per cent. Some spare scraps of the Galley Hill Man had been left in the Museum Collection by one of the original investigators, and we submitted these for analysis. They showed around 0.3 per cent. fluorine. Yet the skeleton had been found in gravels in which the genuine fossil animal bones show 2 per cent. fluorine. Clearly the skeleton is not a quarter of a million years old as has been alleged, but is a comparatively recent burial, almost certainly less than 10,000 years old.
http://www.clarku.edu/...n/map_expose/someapps_flourine.html

BUZSAW B 4 U 2 C Y BUZ SAW.
The immeasurable present is forever consuming the eternal future and extending the infinite past.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 37 by Nuggin, posted 10-04-2007 1:48 AM Nuggin has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 67 by Nuggin, posted 10-05-2007 9:50 PM Buzsaw has replied

  
Buzsaw
Inactive Member


Message 68 of 343 (426280)
10-05-2007 9:58 PM
Reply to: Message 64 by jar
10-05-2007 8:33 PM


Re: Mountains lower
Jar, likely you will agree that the mountains were uplifted via tectonic activity relative to movement/collision of tectonic plates which formed the planet's present morphology. Is that correct?
If that is the case, the question is what caused the movement and uplift due to the plate collision etc. We Bible-creos go with the Bibical historical record as we apply reason and logic factoring in all the corroborating data that gives us reason to lend credence to that record. That historical record factors in a global flood. This topic is not about plate tectonics perse, so don't expect me to digress into that topic to any significant extent.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 64 by jar, posted 10-05-2007 8:33 PM jar has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 69 by jar, posted 10-05-2007 10:05 PM Buzsaw has replied
 Message 71 by Nuggin, posted 10-05-2007 10:07 PM Buzsaw has not replied

  
Buzsaw
Inactive Member


Message 70 of 343 (426285)
10-05-2007 10:07 PM
Reply to: Message 65 by jar
10-05-2007 8:36 PM


Re: Dating Methodology
jar writes:
And where is your evidence there ever was a "greenhouse canopy type atmosphere" (whatever the hell that means) and the model that explains it?
Where is the evidence that it would effect dating methods and the model that explains it?
Where is the evidence "that humans lived multiple century lives" and the model that explains it?
I said I apply reason and logic to all the corroborating evidence for the Biblical historical record. Since you vehemently deny that we Bible-creos use reason and logic, there's no logical reason for us to discuss it.

BUZSAW B 4 U 2 C Y BUZ SAW.
The immeasurable present is forever consuming the eternal future and extending the infinite past.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 65 by jar, posted 10-05-2007 8:36 PM jar has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 72 by jar, posted 10-05-2007 10:11 PM Buzsaw has not replied
 Message 73 by Nuggin, posted 10-05-2007 10:15 PM Buzsaw has not replied

  
Buzsaw
Inactive Member


Message 74 of 343 (426289)
10-05-2007 10:16 PM
Reply to: Message 69 by jar
10-05-2007 10:05 PM


Re: Mountains lower
jar writes:
Slowly, very slowly as we have seen.
Unless, of course, there was a Biblical flood to do the major uplifting relative suddenly, subsequently gradually slowing as time passes. There again though that's applying reason and logic to what we observe and that's not recognized by conventional science.

BUZSAW B 4 U 2 C Y BUZ SAW.
The immeasurable present is forever consuming the eternal future and extending the infinite past.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 69 by jar, posted 10-05-2007 10:05 PM jar has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 76 by jar, posted 10-05-2007 10:23 PM Buzsaw has not replied
 Message 83 by Dr Adequate, posted 10-06-2007 7:01 AM Buzsaw has replied
 Message 92 by obvious Child, posted 10-06-2007 5:31 PM Buzsaw has replied

  
Buzsaw
Inactive Member


Message 75 of 343 (426290)
10-05-2007 10:18 PM


Bathtime, bedtime and church on Sabbath. So long.

  
Buzsaw
Inactive Member


Message 79 of 343 (426300)
10-05-2007 11:49 PM
Reply to: Message 67 by Nuggin
10-05-2007 9:50 PM


Re: "Flood sense"
Nuggins writes:
And, why is your quote from a link which has "piltdown" in the name?
I cited the Galley Hill Skeleton segment which addresses the contamination factor best which was sufficient to make my point so far as I can see. What has your question got to do with anything?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 67 by Nuggin, posted 10-05-2007 9:50 PM Nuggin has not replied

  
Buzsaw
Inactive Member


Message 85 of 343 (426364)
10-06-2007 9:09 AM
Reply to: Message 83 by Dr Adequate
10-06-2007 7:01 AM


Re: Mountains lower
DA writes:
Why a Biblical flood, rather than a team of winged pigs or a geological uplift fairy?
1. What is your soarce of winged pigs and/or an uplift fairy.
2. If even have a source, what corroborating evidence do you have that your source has any credibility?
3. Is there any geological observable evidence that something other than tectonic activity caused the uplift?
DA writes:
Scientists certainly never apply what you call reason and logic. This is because they use actual reason and logic. Oh, and evidence. Remember evidence? It's that stuff people can supply for claims which are actually true.
What do you do with the corroborative evidence of the credibility of the Biblical historical record? Perhaps if you took the time to assimilate and assemble it all, you would think about reconsideration.

BUZSAW B 4 U 2 C Y BUZ SAW.
The immeasurable present is forever consuming the eternal future and extending the infinite past.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 83 by Dr Adequate, posted 10-06-2007 7:01 AM Dr Adequate has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 86 by jar, posted 10-06-2007 9:31 AM Buzsaw has not replied
 Message 88 by Dr Adequate, posted 10-06-2007 12:11 PM Buzsaw has replied
 Message 107 by Archer Opteryx, posted 10-07-2007 11:08 AM Buzsaw has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024