6 online now:	CosmicChimp, nwr, PaulK, Phat, Tangle, Theodoric
Newest Member:	ChatGPT
Post Volume:	Total: 916,909 Year: 4,166/9,624 Month: 1,037/974 Week: 364/286 Day: 7/13 Hour: 0/2

EvC Forum ⇒ Science Forums ⇒ Geology and the Great Flood ⇒

Walt Brown's super-tectonics

Thread ▼ Details

Email This Thread

Newer Topic | Older Topic

Author

Topic: Walt Brown's super-tectonics

simple

Inactive Member

Normal Thread Display

Message 298 of 307 (82872)
02-03-2004 9:53 PM

Reply to: Message 294 by Admin
02-03-2004 6:17 PM

This message is a reply to:
	Message 294 by Admin, posted 02-03-2004 6:17 PM		Admin has not replied

simple

Inactive Member

Normal Thread Display

Message 300 of 307 (82876)
02-03-2004 9:56 PM

Reply to: Message 290 by JonF
02-03-2004 5:40 PM

You have an awfully strange standard, and it's obviously double. Do you think that a very few mistakes are enough to invalidate tens of thousands of correct answers?

take the good, I'd say, out with the bad. Millions or billions is bad.

This message is a reply to:
	Message 290 by JonF, posted 02-03-2004 5:40 PM		JonF has not replied

Replies to this message:
	Message 304 by Coragyps, posted 02-03-2004 10:04 PM		simple has replied

simple

Inactive Member

Normal Thread Display

Message 301 of 307 (82878)
02-03-2004 10:00 PM

Reply to: Message 299 by edge
02-03-2004 9:55 PM

I don't know. First, define pyshics.

misspelled word similar to spritualist predictor, often with a ball. For example Jean Dixon

Yep. According to Walt that is. Walt is wrong. So, what's your point?

point is maybe it's not Walt who's wrong!

This message is a reply to:
	Message 299 by edge, posted 02-03-2004 9:55 PM		edge has not replied

simple

Inactive Member

Normal Thread Display

Message 303 of 307 (82880)
02-03-2004 10:02 PM

Reply to: Message 291 by crashfrog
02-03-2004 5:41 PM

.. It gives weird dates when you do it wrong. It gives very accurate dates when you do it right

I guess you need the touch

This message is a reply to:
	Message 291 by crashfrog, posted 02-03-2004 5:41 PM		crashfrog has not replied

simple

Inactive Member

Normal Thread Display

Message 305 of 307 (82887)
02-03-2004 10:23 PM

Reply to: Message 302 by Coragyps
02-03-2004 10:01 PM

..one would make attempts to measure it

Yes I am aware atempts were made

..A similar galaxy 80 times further from us will look 1/80 as large, and much fainter, than this one

At least it would look smaller!

..Why should that be, in case after case after case?

I thought you were the expert? ..How far away was the closest or farthest star on the day Adam was made? (Since we're asking questions)

This message is a reply to:
	Message 302 by Coragyps, posted 02-03-2004 10:01 PM		Coragyps has not replied

simple

Inactive Member

Normal Thread Display

Message 306 of 307 (82888)
02-03-2004 10:24 PM

Reply to: Message 304 by Coragyps
02-03-2004 10:04 PM

No, that's "Four legs good, two legs bad

Whatever gets you through the night!

This message is a reply to:
	Message 304 by Coragyps, posted 02-03-2004 10:04 PM		Coragyps has not replied

Date format: mm-dd-yyyy

Timezone: ET (US)

Newer Topic | Older Topic

Do Nothing Button