Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
1 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,902 Year: 4,159/9,624 Month: 1,030/974 Week: 357/286 Day: 0/13 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   the new and improved obama thread
Hyroglyphx
Inactive Member


Message 30 of 237 (446382)
01-06-2008 12:35 AM
Reply to: Message 8 by macaroniandcheese
01-04-2008 5:27 PM


Re: Bashing Huckabee
what exactly does huckabee have to offer black people? specifically, what solutions does huckabee have for racial equality issues, or urban development problems, or underclass wage issues, or education access? what does huckabee have to help black people?
It sounds more like you are bashing black people, speaking about them as if they were inferior beings who need pampering. Obviously, what ever Huckabee would be directly doing for all American people would be the same as doing something indirectly for "black people."
Is underclass wage issues a uniquely "black issue?" Is education access a uniquely "black" issue? Is an urban development problem a uniquely "black" issue?
Holy cow, why don't you just come out and say that black people are stupid, why don't you, who will only make it in society if you walk them through life?
This sure is awfully condescending really...
This is precisely the kind of counter-productive, liberal mindset that claims to be out for the greater interest of black people, all the while unwittingly offending them in the process. Sure, their heart is in the right place, but they totally keep the black man shackled to a plantation mentality.
Does Huckabee need to cater specifically to a demographic, or is catering to a demographic ultimately devisive, by compartmentalizing people in to quaint little categories.

“First dentistry was painless, then bicycles were chainless, and carriages were horseless, and many laws enforceless. Next cookery was fireless, telegraphy was wireless, cigars were nicotineless, and coffee caffeineless. Soon oranges were seedless, the putting green was weedless, the college boy was hatless, the proper diet -- fatless. New motor roads are dustless, the latest steel is rustless, our tennis courts are sodless, our new religion -- Godless” -Arthur Guiterman

This message is a reply to:
 Message 8 by macaroniandcheese, posted 01-04-2008 5:27 PM macaroniandcheese has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 31 by macaroniandcheese, posted 01-06-2008 2:00 AM Hyroglyphx has replied
 Message 43 by nator, posted 01-06-2008 2:55 PM Hyroglyphx has not replied

  
Hyroglyphx
Inactive Member


Message 35 of 237 (446477)
01-06-2008 1:07 PM
Reply to: Message 31 by macaroniandcheese
01-06-2008 2:00 AM


Re: Bashing Huckabee
when you don't have a response, call me a racist.
A response to what? You said that Huckabee doesn't have a specific plan for blacks, and therefore, is obviously a racist. You then proceeded to categorically demean all black people without even realizing it.
underclass issues are underclass issues. but when the underclass isn't hugely black, then discuss racism with me.
Rather than suppose a massive conspiracy oppression so pervasive that it would require almost everyone to be "in on it," why not realize that it is culturally driven, when that so obviously is the case?
what i'm suggesting is that they have been systematically disadvantaged by society. why don't you do some reading. read this book and then talk to me about handholding.
You know, I've read many books on the subject, from black scholars no less, that carefully outline the destructive liberal attitude, that while well-meaning, completely keeps a large number of blacks shackled to the very ghetto they aspire to escape from. Its a cultural problem.
what does he have that will actually benefit underclass people?
I don't know what he would specifically do. Then again, there are a lot of issues that I have no idea about what he would specifically do because I wasn't around at the time he spoke about it.
Since this is an Obama thread, and you seem to think that handing black folk money will help them in the long term, perhaps you can outline Obama's goals for the black community.
here's the reality. people are still actively discriminating against blacks.
Yes, I know. I saw it while back home a few months ago. Of course, that goes in both directions.
in south florida, there is a systematic policy of "urban beautification". that is, forcing black people out of the homes they've owned for years, tearing them down, and building fancy, expensive condos and shopping centers for rich white people.
I am aware of the urban beautification plan, but they aren't "forcing" people out of their homes. They offer them a sum larger than what their home is worth. Its a legal transaction.
it's not about pampering, it's about providing real opportunity. do you have any idea how underfunded inner-city schools are?
Brenna, there is a misnomer that exists that if you just give people money, it will fix their problems. But the stark reality is that people of other colors coming from other cultures, living in the same conditions, do well in school. Its also been noted that blacks coming from places like Ghana, Jamaica, countries in Africa, etc, have done exceptionally well when moving to the States.
So what does that mean? That means the problem is with culture, not race, not money, not poverty, not anything else, since culture is clearly driving these forces.
do you have any idea how hard it is to find good teachers willing to work there? do you even begin to comprehend how hard it is to stay in school and get a sufficient education when your family needs you to work because they can't afford the transportation to get a good job outside the ghetto?
Then explain why people in other countries living in similar or worse conditions excel? Explain how it is that Cubans, coming from nothing, ended up wildly successful in South Florida.
Its not a racial issue. Its an issue of culture that drives these "norms" within a racial group.
You saying they live in abject failure only reinforces the helplessness they are supposed to feel. That's crap. And that's condescending.

“First dentistry was painless, then bicycles were chainless, and carriages were horseless, and many laws enforceless. Next cookery was fireless, telegraphy was wireless, cigars were nicotineless, and coffee caffeineless. Soon oranges were seedless, the putting green was weedless, the college boy was hatless, the proper diet -- fatless. New motor roads are dustless, the latest steel is rustless, our tennis courts are sodless, our new religion -- Godless” -Arthur Guiterman

This message is a reply to:
 Message 31 by macaroniandcheese, posted 01-06-2008 2:00 AM macaroniandcheese has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 36 by Modulous, posted 01-06-2008 2:34 PM Hyroglyphx has replied
 Message 38 by macaroniandcheese, posted 01-06-2008 2:43 PM Hyroglyphx has replied
 Message 50 by macaroniandcheese, posted 01-07-2008 8:04 PM Hyroglyphx has not replied

  
Hyroglyphx
Inactive Member


Message 44 of 237 (446667)
01-06-2008 9:37 PM
Reply to: Message 36 by Modulous
01-06-2008 2:34 PM


Re: Race policies
I missed the 'therefore, is obviously a racist' part. Where was that?
Isn't that the obvious implication she sought? Huckabee has no plan for black people, therefore he must be a racist who doesn't care about black people.
It is white people who she demeaned
Yes, of course she meant to demean white people. Its the in-thing to do to blame the world's ills on the white plague of death. I'm specifically talking about she inadvertently demeans black people, tacitly suggesting that unless someone gives them a handout, they will be stuck in limbo.
Maybe my American history is a bit rusty, but wasn't there was a conspiracy of oppression in which almost everyone was 'in on it' only a couple of generations ago? Do you think that a race of people can overcome centuries of oppression within a few generations?
Clearly, yes, because its already happening in the UK and the US! I'd say its going swimmingly, if only there were those who would stop bringing it up and causing more dissension.
Obama will ban racial profiling by federal law enforcement agencies and provide federal incentives to state and local police departments to prohibit the practice.
Its funny how every man, woman, and child profiles from an early age by learning the psychology of others. For some odd reason that is not encouraged when it comes to law enforcement. Of course, it did say "racial" profiling. What I would be looking for is things like demeanor.
Obama has worked to promote civil rights and fairness in the criminal justice system throughout his career. As a community organizer, Obama helped 150,000 African Americans register to vote.
A wise move on his part.
quote:
Explain how it is that Cubans, coming from nothing, ended up wildly successful in South Florida.
Massive government aid?
Actually its this really strange thing, foreign to many people now or days, called, "hard work."
Of course a Socialist would say government aid.
The major source of the economic stimulus for this activity came from the federal government. In 1960, the fiscally conservative Republicans contributed four million dollars in benefits to the refugees, but by 1961, under the Kennedy administration, expenditures on Cuban refugees increased to $2.4 million a month. By 1976 from this source alone (Cuban Refugee Program) over 1.6 Billion dollars were injected into the Cuban community. In addition, traditional disbursement sources such as the Small Business Association, began targeting the Latins also.
Considering the bulk of Cubans living in South Florida are the product of the Mariel Boat Lift, I see these figures as being totally erroneous. Because what we soon learn is that you can't throw money at a problem and expect it to fix itself.

“First dentistry was painless, then bicycles were chainless, and carriages were horseless, and many laws enforceless. Next cookery was fireless, telegraphy was wireless, cigars were nicotineless, and coffee caffeineless. Soon oranges were seedless, the putting green was weedless, the college boy was hatless, the proper diet -- fatless. New motor roads are dustless, the latest steel is rustless, our tennis courts are sodless, our new religion -- Godless” -Arthur Guiterman

This message is a reply to:
 Message 36 by Modulous, posted 01-06-2008 2:34 PM Modulous has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 45 by Modulous, posted 01-07-2008 7:27 AM Hyroglyphx has replied
 Message 46 by macaroniandcheese, posted 01-07-2008 10:33 AM Hyroglyphx has replied
 Message 49 by macaroniandcheese, posted 01-07-2008 8:04 PM Hyroglyphx has not replied

  
Hyroglyphx
Inactive Member


Message 51 of 237 (447034)
01-07-2008 8:21 PM
Reply to: Message 38 by macaroniandcheese
01-06-2008 2:43 PM


Re: Bashing Huckabee
i didn't say he was a racist, i just said he had nothing to benefit black people, so why would they vote for him.
It was strongly implied. If Huckabee does something for all Americans, how do black people get cut out of the loop?
the residential segregation is systematic and purposeful.
What is residential segregation mean?
and yes, it's culturally driven. does that mean it's okay? no. we enact policy to combat the cultural ills that we have.
We have! Doesn't seem to work. The problem is with Hollywood perpetuating this ignorant notion that anything other than thug life bling-bling means you are an Uncle Tom. I mean, come on, every truly funny black comedian talks about it. Why? Mmmmm, prolly cause its true.
But I say someone need not be shackled to that stereotype. And indeed there are many black scholars and entertainers that want to break out of it. That's also the surest way to know that it has nothing to do with race and everything to do with culture. What I have seen is some liberal accolytes claiming that this type of behavior as being authentic African heritage. LOL! Yeah right! Just like how Kwanza is authentic, I'm sure.
Black Rednecks and White Liberals was one of the most insightful books on the subject that I've ever read. Sowell isn't alone there. Shelby Steele is equally brilliant.
So when I hear people saying things specifically about black people, it gives the impression of devisiveness and an unwillingness to look beyond the races, rather than the cultural norms that masquerade as racial problems. It has nothing to do with race.
stop labeling me and listen to what i have to say, jerk.
I heard what you said. Forgive me if I have the ability to read behind the lines. I guess I'm just intuitive.
when there's no funding for inner-city schools, how are these individuals going to get a sufficient education?
Brenna, this is a fact. Even in predominantly black schools, there are still minorities of different races attending. You should note that none of them get more money than the other. So why is it that some Asian kid, in the same destitute situation, excels where their counterparts fail? It isn't intelligence. Its culture.
Indians, living in abject squalor, statistically fair better than the richest of little suburbanite white kids. Why? Because their culture has not been corrupted by the slothful, indifferent American attitude that now pervades the country.
Its all culture. If you want to fix problems, you can't expect money to solve it when no one has the intestinal fortitude to step up to a challenge. All it proves is a waste of money. Money is just the tool for resources, which there is nothing inherently wrong with, of course. But until someone utilizes that money for their own good, we're going to have a repeat of this sad situation.
if the real estate industry has admitted to purposely segregating neighborhoods (they did in that book) then is that cultural or conspiratorial?
I'm sure you are going to have some people in real estate try and keep the darker folk out. I personally have never seen such a thing. What I notice is that people in that business want a person who is reliable, who isn't so ghetto that they devalue the entire block. But that has nothing to do with race, I'm betting. I'll bet it has everything to do with attitude.
education has to be funded. communities need to be integrated. there needs to be a real source of decent, safe, sanitary, affordable housing for everyone. there needs to be a consistent policy of urban renewal that actually benefits the people who live there instead of pushing them out to make way for rich, white leeches.
Every one of those things has a legal basis. What you are really advocating, by the sound of it, is a communist society where you indiscriminantly give to people who don't earn, and think that a bed of flowers will blossom out of it. How many failures will it take to prove to you that Marxism doesn't work?
and voting needs to be accessible. are you aware of the restrictions that have been put on voting recently? this attempt to institute a identification card (do you know how expensive those are)? the voter registration card is sent verified by social security number to the verfied address of residence. if the government were to provide a free photo identification, that's one thing. but a state issued id costs money currently, and that amounts to a poll tax, and THAT is unconstitutional.
Okay, well, I've never heard of that and I've lived in 6 different states. I agree with you that if that is happening, it certainly is unconstitutional, but I'm not sure how this ties in to our particular discussion.

“First dentistry was painless, then bicycles were chainless, and carriages were horseless, and many laws enforceless. Next cookery was fireless, telegraphy was wireless, cigars were nicotineless, and coffee caffeineless. Soon oranges were seedless, the putting green was weedless, the college boy was hatless, the proper diet -- fatless. New motor roads are dustless, the latest steel is rustless, our tennis courts are sodless, our new religion -- Godless” -Arthur Guiterman

This message is a reply to:
 Message 38 by macaroniandcheese, posted 01-06-2008 2:43 PM macaroniandcheese has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 54 by macaroniandcheese, posted 01-07-2008 8:54 PM Hyroglyphx has replied
 Message 61 by Modulous, posted 01-08-2008 8:49 AM Hyroglyphx has not replied

  
Hyroglyphx
Inactive Member


Message 56 of 237 (447085)
01-08-2008 12:57 AM
Reply to: Message 45 by Modulous
01-07-2008 7:27 AM


Re: Race policies
In context it looked like the implication was that Huckabee has no specific plan for black people so why would they vote for him over someone who does?
Does the Prime Minister have specific plans for black folk in the UK? Does there need to be a specific plan for black folk when we are one and the same? Isn't singling out black people perpetuating devisiveness?
Well, in fairness, I was only talking about US residents in which the white people did do the majority of wrongs. However, in Africa, there were many blacks that were prospering from the slave trade and they too must share some blame.
Are you saying that the slave trade was confined to America? I should hope not, being that most of Western Europe was in on it.
How is it demeaning to point out that a certain race of people is disproportionally disadvantaged and might require specific attention?
I don't believe there is one any longer. Its all attitude. Are you telling me that Bill Cosby would be passed up by K-Fed for a job? Sorry, but I don't buy it.
Clearly it is beginning to happen, but clearly the transition is not total since clearly black people are still disproportionally disadvantaged in the US.
Modulous, did it ever occur to you that some people commit disadvantages themselves? Again, are you telling me that Britney Spears, because she's white, could get a job over Oprah Winfrey, because she's black? I don't think so! You can't discount attitude.
The wisdom (or lack thereof) of racial profiling is one thing, but this is an example of something Obama is doing to win the minority vote, maybe not everybody will accept it - but I imagine plenty will.
Sure, he's a smart man.
if you feel that blacks are simply lazy and that centuries of oppression and neglect are irrelevant, I can't stop you.
I think many blacks are lazy, just like many whites are lazy. I wouldn't begin to quantify something like that. But here's my problem: Lazy, ignorant, unkempt, discourteous black folk might get a job just because they are black, rather than say, (oh, I don't know), on the measure of their character -- something Martin Luther King, a true patriot, said.
Its this extreme patronizing. Its pathetic. Its condescending. And moreover, its RACISM. How is that not blindingly obvious? You know, if I were a black man and someone offered me a job just because I'm black, I'd probably slap the hell out of them and say, "How dare you patronize me! I don't need your pittance. I'm a man, dammit. If you were so color blind, my race wouldn't factor in at ALL!"
There is a difference between throwing money at a problem and investing money in a solution. As you finding these numbers 'erroneous', I am afraid I will have to trust the professor of History from St Thomas University Miami when it comes to the history of Miami. I hope you'll understand.
Fantastic. So, for the record, are you stating, in no uncertain terms, that the only reason Cubans are successful is because money was thrown at them from the beginning?
My brother-in-law might find that very interesting. And here I though he was a self-made man.

“First dentistry was painless, then bicycles were chainless, and carriages were horseless, and many laws enforceless. Next cookery was fireless, telegraphy was wireless, cigars were nicotineless, and coffee caffeineless. Soon oranges were seedless, the putting green was weedless, the college boy was hatless, the proper diet -- fatless. New motor roads are dustless, the latest steel is rustless, our tennis courts are sodless, our new religion -- Godless” -Arthur Guiterman

This message is a reply to:
 Message 45 by Modulous, posted 01-07-2008 7:27 AM Modulous has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 59 by Modulous, posted 01-08-2008 7:17 AM Hyroglyphx has not replied
 Message 60 by sinequanon, posted 01-08-2008 8:35 AM Hyroglyphx has not replied

  
Hyroglyphx
Inactive Member


Message 67 of 237 (447352)
01-08-2008 11:12 PM
Reply to: Message 46 by macaroniandcheese
01-07-2008 10:33 AM


Re: Race policies
my contention is that he has no policy plan for them, so why should they vote for him.
Why does he need a specific policy for blacks that differs from whites, or any other Americans? Why? Aren't we one nation? Aren't we all human beings?
i'm suggesting that people ought to be treated fairly. i'm not talking about handouts, i'm talking about equal opportunities.
Brenna, the law is in place already. Other than prosecuting people who fail to meet this basic criteria, what more would you like to see done? The next option is special compensation.
why don't you read my post and respond to me.
I've responded to several of your posts. Which post are you referring to?
why don't you spend an hour, just an hour, in a ghetto.
I just lived in the ghetto for 3 years! I finally got out. Maybe you should live in the ghetto. You sure wouldn't feel sorry for all the people there, because it would become instantly apparent that many of them have allowed themselves to languish there. Not all, certainly, but a very, very high percentage.
so just because people are naturally fearful and hateful this is an acceptable practice for our law enforcement officers?
Not only does EVERYONE profile, (including you: I don't have to personally know you, to know that), profiling is an integral part of detective work. Or did you think that serial killers are just unlucky people?
Now, that said: Racial profiling is garbage because its too subjective. That said, demeanor and appearance that extends beyond race, is a very important tool to establish reasonable suspicion. If you saw a gaggle of white kids with shaved heads, red suspenders, combat boots with white laces, wearing wife beaters, and adorned with swastika tattoos, chances are that the sensitivity training you underwent is gonna go right out the window -- and rightfully so.
Ever check a guy out at a bar, a department store, or a grocery store? Well, that's profiling. You are gathering little clues about him to see if he may be a good suitor. Is there something inherently fearful or hateful about that? I should hope not.
In order to provide aid to recently arrived Cuban immigrants, the United States Congress passed the Cuban Adjustment Act in 1966.
So this is the reason why Cubans are successful in South Florida?!?!? I'll let my brother-in-law know.

“First dentistry was painless, then bicycles were chainless, and carriages were horseless, and many laws enforceless. Next cookery was fireless, telegraphy was wireless, cigars were nicotineless, and coffee caffeineless. Soon oranges were seedless, the putting green was weedless, the college boy was hatless, the proper diet -- fatless. New motor roads are dustless, the latest steel is rustless, our tennis courts are sodless, our new religion -- Godless” -Arthur Guiterman

This message is a reply to:
 Message 46 by macaroniandcheese, posted 01-07-2008 10:33 AM macaroniandcheese has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 68 by macaroniandcheese, posted 01-08-2008 11:40 PM Hyroglyphx has not replied
 Message 70 by molbiogirl, posted 01-10-2008 2:46 AM Hyroglyphx has not replied

  
Hyroglyphx
Inactive Member


Message 83 of 237 (448192)
01-12-2008 11:59 AM
Reply to: Message 54 by macaroniandcheese
01-07-2008 8:54 PM


Re: Bashing Huckabee
i think i'm competent to say what i implied. it wasn't that he was racist, it's that he has terrible policy plans.
Whatever... I guess there is nothing left to say. Don't vote for him.
read the book i linked you to, or even read the reviews of it. use your fucking google. i did loads of homework for you, now you do some.
Homework on what exactly? Trying to prove that the black man is hopelessly destitute? I guess I'm just not a cynical defeatist.
i think by "hollywood" you mean white people.
By Hollywood, I mean white liberals.
you mean invent strawmen and argue with yourself.
No, I mean read between the lines.
quote:
Brenna, this is a fact. Even in predominantly black schools, there are still minorities of different races attending. You should note that none of them get more money than the other. So why is it that some Asian kid, in the same destitute situation, excels where their counterparts fail? It isn't intelligence. Its culture.
they're just lazy, culturally. i see. also, why don't you demonstrate your claim.
Go to any ghetto anywhere in America and then tell me what you see.
so the only reason there are fewer black female executives than white female executives is because they're culturally incompetent and culturally predestined to be baby-squirting welfare queens?
It all depends on the situation. African Americans comprise approximately 12% of the total population of the United States. That's not very large considering that hispanics have now surpassed them in number in a span of fifty years or so.
if you'd read that book i linked, you'd know that it contains actual demonstrable proof of industry standards to keep blacks out of white neighborhoods to reduce the perception of the decline of the neighborhoods regardless of the income of the black people in question.
I'm not going to go run out to Borders or Barnes and Nobles right now, but I will have the book in the back of my mind the next time I happen to be there.
Racism still exists, unquestionably. But that doesn't have to be a convenient scapegoat. In the mind of a liberal, racism only goes in one direction, which directly correlates to the overall perception of communist ideologies. Anyone in a minority status can do no wrong, where people in a majority status are out to destroy the minority.
The reality is that none of it is so clear cut. There are many factors and extenuating circumstances at work.
seriously. do some work. unbelievable. no wonder you have no idea.
Brenna, I know what's going on. The question is, do you? Or are you just listening to the little birdy in your ear who decries injustice about everything?
Until there is a complete inversion of the norms, NOT equality, the liberal will not be happy.
quote:
Every one of those things has a legal basis. What you are really advocating, by the sound of it, is a communist society where you indiscriminantly give to people who don't earn, and think that a bed of flowers will blossom out of it. How many failures will it take to prove to you that Marxism doesn't work?
wow. you really do just make up your arguments. do you think maybe i'm really advocating what i fucking say i'm advocating? you really feel the need to make up an enemy to argue with? so now i'm a pinko commie bastard. hell. i thought i was joking. thank you so much for helping me find my place in the world.
You may not even be aware of the origins of your beliefs. I happen to know where it stems from and how it now has infiltrated the mainstream in to the commercials we watch to every day modes of speech. Umwertung aller Werte.
and i swear to god, if buz suspends me because i used the word "fucking", i'm throwing a piss fit. it's simple cursing, not "meanspirited" or insulting. i don't need to insult nem. he's already demonstrated a complete unwillingness to learn anything on his own or actually debate my arguments instead of his own.
Brenna, when do you ever actually address what I've said? If I ask you a question, you take it to mean that you needn't answer it except with a question of your own.

“First dentistry was painless, then bicycles were chainless, and carriages were horseless, and many laws enforceless. Next cookery was fireless, telegraphy was wireless, cigars were nicotineless, and coffee caffeineless. Soon oranges were seedless, the putting green was weedless, the college boy was hatless, the proper diet -- fatless. New motor roads are dustless, the latest steel is rustless, our tennis courts are sodless, our new religion -- Godless” -Arthur Guiterman

This message is a reply to:
 Message 54 by macaroniandcheese, posted 01-07-2008 8:54 PM macaroniandcheese has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 84 by macaroniandcheese, posted 01-12-2008 12:08 PM Hyroglyphx has not replied

  
Hyroglyphx
Inactive Member


Message 95 of 237 (448330)
01-13-2008 12:00 AM
Reply to: Message 57 by molbiogirl
01-08-2008 2:21 AM


Re: Bashing Huckabee
What does Kwanza have to do with the price of tea in China?
I mentioned Kwanza because it is an illustration of attempting to authenticate something as being genuinely African in culture when in fact it has nothing to do with anything African.
Yes. Juggs. Let's see some stats. (PREDICTION: you run from this request for documentation like you have from all the others.)
Some stats on what? You never asked what it is that you want some statistics for.
quote:
Indians, living in abject squalor, statistically fair better than the richest of little suburbanite white kids. Why? Because their culture has not been corrupted by the slothful, indifferent American attitude that now pervades the country.
Juggs, let's see some cites. Enough already. We've had it about up to here with your bare assertions.
Sure. In every single bracket, African Americans score lower than every one of their peers. See, one might be able to chalk this up to how one race is more disadvantaged than others. The problem is, every school in America is integrated, which means all people's of all colors are attending the same schools. So there is no bias to rely on. It obviously culturally induced rather The Man out to get people of another color.
The trends very plainly speak for themselves.
Maryland/DC, Grades 4-8 reveal that Asian and caucasian students routinely score higher, The same in mathematics.
Over and over again we see that some minorities do well, whereas others do not do well. There are only two serious options from which to deduce the reality of the situation. Either Asian and Caucasian people are inherently more intelligent than other races, or certain cultural pressures make for a lackadaisacal attitude towards education.
The easiest way to determine whether it is genetically caused is to look at the aggregates of the same race and juxtapose those statistics by different locations.
If it can be demonstrated that, say, that Jamaicans living in squalor statistically do better than, say, African Americans, then there is the surest way to know that race literally bears no relevance to a persons intelligence.
So, what then are some extenuating circumstances? Some people say that poverty will effect it. And while that is certainly a consideration, it does nothing to explain why impoverished nations routinely score vastly higher than Americans or certain Europeans.
It will become instantly apparent that race and/or poverty have no direct correlation to how well the population will do scholastically, but rather, is evidence of how culture often dictates how people will act and perform within any given society.
And lets face it, we all know its true.
The same could be said of juxtaposing white Americans next to white Europeans. They are basically genetically identical because the white Americans originate from Europe. Yet, Europeans almost always score higher than Americans. Therefore, it seems blindingly obvious that it has everything to do with culture, and nothing to do with race.
quote:
What I notice is that people in that business want a person who is reliable, who isn't so ghetto that they devalue the entire block.
Aw, yeah. That's what I want to hear. Unvarnished racism, in the wild, as it were.
How is that racist when I mentioned nothing about race? I am talking about ghetto behavior, you know, crass, course, bragadocious, ill-tempered behavior that is prevalent in urban communities? The surest way to know that what I'm saying is true is to note that one of the most coveted dreams of inhabitants of the ghetto, is to get out of the ghetto.
I don't see how it is possible in this day and age for an average realtor to disallow someone like Barack Obama to live in an upper-class neighborhood, but allow a thug personified, like, say, Eminem, to live there solely on the basis that one is white and the other black, rather than, one is ghetto and the other can conduct themselves in a civilized manner.
Juggs, let's hear some more about "those people". What are their undesirable traits again? You know. Ghetto traits?
A higher propensity for violence, crime, drug addiction, low educational standards, poor manners, etc, etc.
(PREDICTION: Juggs will never answer this question.)
Well, you know MBG, if you want to address me to respond to something, you should respond to me. You wrote this post to brenna, not to me, yet you are speaking as if you were talking to me rather than to her. I almost didn't see this post, which surely would have made your prognostications come true. But then, that was probably your intent.

“First dentistry was painless, then bicycles were chainless, and carriages were horseless, and many laws enforceless. Next cookery was fireless, telegraphy was wireless, cigars were nicotineless, and coffee caffeineless. Soon oranges were seedless, the putting green was weedless, the college boy was hatless, the proper diet -- fatless. New motor roads are dustless, the latest steel is rustless, our tennis courts are sodless, our new religion -- Godless” -Arthur Guiterman

This message is a reply to:
 Message 57 by molbiogirl, posted 01-08-2008 2:21 AM molbiogirl has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024