Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
1 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,902 Year: 4,159/9,624 Month: 1,030/974 Week: 357/286 Day: 0/13 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   the new and improved obama thread
Granny Magda
Member
Posts: 2462
From: UK
Joined: 11-12-2007
Member Rating: 3.8


Message 115 of 237 (460352)
03-14-2008 11:52 AM
Reply to: Message 114 by Buzsaw
03-14-2008 11:25 AM


Re: ABC's Tapes On Obama's Church
Hi Buz,
All I got was a message saying "You have chosen a page that does not exist.".

Mutate and Survive

This message is a reply to:
 Message 114 by Buzsaw, posted 03-14-2008 11:25 AM Buzsaw has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 116 by molbiogirl, posted 03-14-2008 12:46 PM Granny Magda has replied

  
Granny Magda
Member
Posts: 2462
From: UK
Joined: 11-12-2007
Member Rating: 3.8


Message 117 of 237 (460377)
03-14-2008 3:09 PM
Reply to: Message 116 by molbiogirl
03-14-2008 12:46 PM


Re: ABC's Tapes On Obama's Church
Firstly, many thanks for the link, Molbiogirl.
So let's take a look at what Buz said;
Buzsaw writes:
I have shown as well how closely he has chosen to be closely associated with a radical black racist Christian church who's pastor espouses racist black power and antisemitic agendas and who has connections with racist Nation of Islam's leaders.
All bolding is mine of course.
Now if anyone can see anything like the bolded statements in the article Buz cites, I would love to get a helping hand spotting it, as I can't see it myself. Where is the racism? Which bit is anti-Semitic? Where does he call for black power? Is there even any mention of the Nation of Islam?
Of course, it could be that I can't see it because it's not there, and Buz is just clutching at straws. It all sounds like smear, innuendo and falsehoods to me.

Mutate and Survive

This message is a reply to:
 Message 116 by molbiogirl, posted 03-14-2008 12:46 PM molbiogirl has not replied

  
Granny Magda
Member
Posts: 2462
From: UK
Joined: 11-12-2007
Member Rating: 3.8


Message 119 of 237 (460398)
03-14-2008 5:45 PM
Reply to: Message 118 by Buzsaw
03-14-2008 4:20 PM


Obama and the Rev. Wright
Buz,
1. No presidential candidate sat and listened to Pat and Jerry implicate blacks 23 years for ruining the nation, ending bloody WWII with what it took to do it (saving lives in the long run) or calling for damnation on America.
I must have been dozing off when Wright specified that whites were to blame for Hiroshima and Nagasaki (I thought he used the word "we"; maybe I was dreaming), or where he actually accused whites of ruining the nation. Funny that.
Besides, just because Obama has listens to Wright, it does not mean he agrees with him on every single issue, still less that he would follow any of Wright's advice. I doubt that every member of your congregation slavishly believes every word you say; I certainly hope not.
Anyway, you were going to demonstrate that Wright was a "radical black racist" and that he is "antisemetic" and that he "espouses racist black power" and that he "has connections with racist Nation of Islam's leaders". You have ignored my request to show me the bit of your cited article that backs up any of these assertions. I assume that the reason for this is because you know full well that your cite demonstrates nothing of the sort.
2. No presidential candidate likely donated tens of thousands to Jerry or Pat's ministry, were married and baptized by them or took their children regularly to hear them.
You need to demonstrate that there is something wrong with the pastor before it follows that there is something wrong with supporting him. You have ignored my invitation to back up your slurs. The worst your article has on Wright is that he said "damn America". Oh horror! Obama sits and listens to someone exercising his right of free speech! How awful! This is pretty tame stuff compared to your accusations.
3. During WWII the Biblical morality principles were more entrenched in America than after the hippy era. When 9/11 happened, Biblical morality was at an all time low up to that point. Pat and Jerry could cite Biblical scripture pertaining to warnings by the Biblical god to nations that departed from moral principles in scripture.
Pat and Jerry could cite scripture that predicted any damn thing they liked, as they share(d) your bent for twisting the Bible into whatever suits the current agenda.
One of the few genuinely controversial things that Wright says in the article is that America is partly to blame for 9/11, an argument that is far from unusual. You seem to be implying that America is entirely to blame, due to its sinful ways inviting divine hissy-fits. So, you and Pat and Jerry appear to outdo Wright in this arena, as Molbiogirl points out.
4. Jerry and Pat's warnings were across the board racially. They were not incessantly, year in and year out fomenting racial hatred toward Jews or any other race as were Jeremiah Wright's.
Again, I must have developed hysterical blindness when I read the anti-Semetic bits, as I didn't see any. Again, I invite you to point them out to me. Until then, this seems like more smear tactic bullshit.

Mutate and Survive

This message is a reply to:
 Message 118 by Buzsaw, posted 03-14-2008 4:20 PM Buzsaw has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 121 by Buzsaw, posted 03-14-2008 9:39 PM Granny Magda has replied

  
Granny Magda
Member
Posts: 2462
From: UK
Joined: 11-12-2007
Member Rating: 3.8


Message 126 of 237 (460475)
03-15-2008 1:08 PM
Reply to: Message 121 by Buzsaw
03-14-2008 9:39 PM


Re: Obama and the Rev. Wright
KKK America huh? Well that is certainly fairly inflammatory, but it's just rhetoric. Face facts, America still has a race problem. It is well known that those executed by the US state are disproportionately black ( as evidenced here ). If I was keen on the same kind of rhetoric as Wright, I might call that state-sponsored lynching. He calls it KKK America. So what? He has a legitimate beef.
He implies that whites are to blame for racism against blacks. Big surprise. Did you expect him to blame the Chinese? I have a news flash for you; the vast majority of those running your country are rich whites.
3. The anti-Semitism is implicated by that fact that Wright traveled to Lybia with Louis Farrakan and awarded Louis Farrakan for his contribution to society.
Well that does demonstrate extremely poor judgement on Wright's part; if it is true, which you haven't bothered to demonstrate. I'm not saying it isn't true, I'm just saying that it would be nice if you bothered to back this kind of thing up.
We all know that Farrakhan is an asswipe. Farrakhan is anti-Semitic. That does not demonstrate that Wright is anti-Semitic. All you can do is say "Obama is bad, because he knows a guy who knows a guy who's anti-Semitic.". Pretty weak Buz.
Obama has chosen to be closely associated with this preacher who has been spewing this hatred for a long time.
Fundamentally dishonest. You have repeatedly failed to demonstrate that Wright has "spewed" any hate against Jews or anyone else.
Wright's Farrakanish anti-Semitic rhetoric also is telling when he chastises America for supporting Israel insisting that we are supporting terrorism against the Palestinians.
Let's be quite clear. Criticising Israel is not anti-Semitic. I happen to agree with Wright on this one.
Of course the UTube segment clearly implicates racism here in that white America allegedly runs America.
The one you didn't link to?
Has he forgotten Colin Powell and other blacks who helped shape American policy in the Mid-East?
Probably. I know I have. A few black people in power changes little. Black people still get a raw deal, and whites still run the show. Britain is far from perfect in this department either by the way.
4. This nonsense that Obama doesn't agree with all this racism and anti-Semitism doesn't wash. As Mark Levin correctly states, Obama along with his wife and children has been listening to this hateful racist propaganda preached to his congregation for many years. Then he equates him to an uncle who gets carried away. Nonsense! (abe: As Mark put it,) one doesn't choose who's his uncle. One chooses one's mentor and pastor for his family because he likes his ideals and his preaching.
Again, do you really think that all of your congregation agree with every word you say? Sounds like amazing arrogance to me. You have yet to demonstrate that Wright has said anything racist or anti-Semitic, so it doesn't really matter what Obama thinks of him.

Mutate and Survive

This message is a reply to:
 Message 121 by Buzsaw, posted 03-14-2008 9:39 PM Buzsaw has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 127 by Buzsaw, posted 03-15-2008 2:50 PM Granny Magda has not replied
 Message 128 by Buzsaw, posted 03-15-2008 2:59 PM Granny Magda has replied

  
Granny Magda
Member
Posts: 2462
From: UK
Joined: 11-12-2007
Member Rating: 3.8


Message 148 of 237 (460512)
03-15-2008 8:50 PM
Reply to: Message 128 by Buzsaw
03-15-2008 2:59 PM


Re: Obama and the Rev. Wright
For the record, I am not a preacher and do not have a congregation who listens to me. I am a full time merchant
Whoops! My mistake, I'm clearly getting you mixed up with another member or something. My apologies.
The point that I was attempting to make was that you have not demonstrated that Obama agrees with everything that Wright says or that Obama will follow Wright's advice. That point still stands.
You can go here and access all of the tapes relative to what I've been claiming.
The single video you link to contains none of the alleged racism, etc. If you want to trawl the net looking for unpalatable comments from Wright, with which you can smear Obama, be my guest. Don't expect me to do your homework though.
Similarly, feel free to dig up Farrakhan-related dirt on Wright. It doesn't really matter though, because Wright is not Obama. Show me that Obama has given Farrakhan some cheesy award, and I'll be suitably appalled, but just because Wright has rubbed shoulders with the old hate-monger, it doesn't affect Obama. Guilt by association is an especially poor argument when it is employed at arms length.
1. Farrakhan is an asswipe.
2. Farrakhan is anti-Semitic.
3. Wright travels to Libya (Muslim dictatorial nation) with Nation Of Islam's darling, Louis Farrakhan.
4. Wright's church awards Farrakhan with high award for (ABE: contribution)
5. Wright is not anti-Semitic.
(ABE: 6. Obama, his wife and two young children listen to this preacher for 23 years (all the years of the children).
7. Obaman's anti-Semiticsm is not in question? )
You tell me, Granny, what's wrong with this picture?
Well I have not said that Wright is not anti-Semitic. I am saying that you have failed to demonstrate that Wright is anti-Semitic.
Also, calling Libya a "Muslim dictatorial nation", is a little off the mark. Libya is no Islamic theocracy. "Dictatorial Muslim nation" would have been better phrasing, although still irrelevant to those of us who don't soil ourselves at the mere mention of the word "Muslim".
This is just guilt by association, and we could play this game with any of the candidates. Every politician has unpalatable friends and allies. They are not the ones running for office. It is a shame that you are so unwilling to judge the candidate on his own merit. Obama has said that he is not anti-Semitic and no-one has proved that he is. He gets to be considered innocent until proven guilty.
I am quite amused by your indignation at the indoctrination of Obama's kids. You almost sound like Richard Dawkins, trembling with anger at the brain-washing of the poor children. Are you really suggesting that there is something wrong with a parent taking their child to the religious service of their choice? That seems a little hypocritical.
Bottom line; you are yet to back up any of your various slurs.

Mutate and Survive

This message is a reply to:
 Message 128 by Buzsaw, posted 03-15-2008 2:59 PM Buzsaw has not replied

  
Granny Magda
Member
Posts: 2462
From: UK
Joined: 11-12-2007
Member Rating: 3.8


Message 165 of 237 (460633)
03-17-2008 2:13 PM
Reply to: Message 160 by Buzsaw
03-17-2008 8:55 AM


At last you say something I can agree with;
You still have Wright's problem with his close ties to the Nation of Islam
That's right, it's Wright's problem, not Obama's. They are different people you know. Wright is not standing; Obama is. For all I know, you may slavishly accept every single word that is said in your preferred place of worship, but believe it or not, not everyone is so lacking in critical faculties.
Maybe these scare tactics would work better if you just typed "muslim,muslim,muslim" in small type at the bottom of each of your posts.

Mutate and Survive

This message is a reply to:
 Message 160 by Buzsaw, posted 03-17-2008 8:55 AM Buzsaw has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024