Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
4 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,913 Year: 4,170/9,624 Month: 1,041/974 Week: 368/286 Day: 11/13 Hour: 1/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   The Clergy Project
bkelly
Inactive Member


Message 35 of 151 (263391)
11-26-2005 6:12 PM
Reply to: Message 3 by Faith
11-25-2005 10:06 PM


site comparison
When accessing the link provided by PaulK in the OP,
Page not found - University of Wisconsin Oshkosh University of Wisconsin Oshkosh
We find a site that presents its point of view. The site opens with the page that essentially says, here is the information you were seeking.
On the other hand, reference the link provided by Faith:
What Conservative Protestants Believe - Beliefnet
On my first visit, I was greeted with some popup about winning a million dollars. On the second visit, the top of the page was inhabited by an ad for Angel Bracelets, with the powerful healing properties of natural gemstones. A link on the left side takes one to "Belief-O-Matic" where even it you don't know your faith, the magical web site does.
Could it be that the basic concepts of these two sites and the differences between them provide us with a clue as to the mental state of the site owners?
Let’s see, proponents of evolution say, here are the facts. The others say, Oh my God, win a million dollars, wear magical jewelry that will enhance your life.
What can we conclude from this bit of information?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 3 by Faith, posted 11-25-2005 10:06 PM Faith has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 37 by nwr, posted 11-26-2005 6:39 PM bkelly has not replied
 Message 39 by Faith, posted 11-26-2005 7:50 PM bkelly has replied

  
bkelly
Inactive Member


Message 36 of 151 (263397)
11-26-2005 6:37 PM
Reply to: Message 3 by Faith
11-25-2005 10:06 PM


another definition problem
Faith,
Will you please give me your short and concise defition of liberal clergy and of conservative clergy?
Thank you.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 3 by Faith, posted 11-25-2005 10:06 PM Faith has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 40 by Faith, posted 11-26-2005 7:55 PM bkelly has not replied

  
bkelly
Inactive Member


Message 43 of 151 (263422)
11-26-2005 10:01 PM
Reply to: Message 41 by Faith
11-26-2005 8:10 PM


Re: definition of christian
Faith writes:
You are welcome to your opinion, but it has nothing to do with the definition of a Christian.
What does it mean to be a christian?
According to history, it means that if you are not christian, you should be killed. Witness the Inquisitions. Ask the Jews.
It means that if you do not live the lifestyle christians preach, you should be killed. Wittness current christian position on homosexuality.
Have you actually read your bible. Lets start with exodus?
exodus 23:24 writes:
Thou shalt not bow down to their gods, nor serve them, nor do after their works: but thou shalt utterly overthrow them, and quite break down their images.
This says if you believe in the christian god, you shall overthrow those who do not.
exodus 23:33 writes:
They shall not dwell in thy land, lest they make thee sin against me: for if thou serve their gods, it will surely be a snare unto thee.
This says that you shall not allow non believers to live where you live. If you are a christian you are obligated to kick me out of your country.
This is just a tiny sampling of the hate and intolerance of the bible. To be a christian means to accept, endorse, and carry out this will of your gods. (and yes, the bibles does say there are multiple gods)

This message is a reply to:
 Message 41 by Faith, posted 11-26-2005 8:10 PM Faith has not replied

  
bkelly
Inactive Member


Message 44 of 151 (263425)
11-26-2005 10:13 PM
Reply to: Message 39 by Faith
11-26-2005 7:50 PM


Re: site comparison
Faith writes:
Not much, unless it might be that websites come in a variety of formats.
I don't agree with that. You picked and referenced the site. To a degree, that does mean you do endorse their message and and along with that, their presentation.
Should a good christian site endorse the concept of "Look here, get rich quick!"?
Should a good christian site endorse the concept of magical jewelry to make you a healthy and better person?
With your link, did you direct us to a site with good christian values or not? I am trying for a yes or no here.

Truth fears no question.
bkelly

This message is a reply to:
 Message 39 by Faith, posted 11-26-2005 7:50 PM Faith has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 45 by jar, posted 11-26-2005 10:21 PM bkelly has not replied

  
bkelly
Inactive Member


Message 84 of 151 (263763)
11-28-2005 12:23 PM
Reply to: Message 70 by Lizard Breath
11-27-2005 7:02 PM


Re: Falling away
Lizard Breath writes:
I can't answer it any more clearly. If you accept evolution, then you are wasting your time persueing the God of the Bible. They cannot coexist.
That is not what the pope says. The pope is about as christian and one can get, and probably about as conservative as they come. Check the in the new thread I started about Vatican snubs ID.
(edited to fix a typo)
This message has been edited by bkelly, 11-28-2005 05:51 PM

This message is a reply to:
 Message 70 by Lizard Breath, posted 11-27-2005 7:02 PM Lizard Breath has not replied

  
bkelly
Inactive Member


Message 85 of 151 (263764)
11-28-2005 12:28 PM
Reply to: Message 82 by Omnivorous
11-28-2005 12:14 PM


Re: Definition of Christian
Omnivorous writes:
I grew up with blue collar Christians. None of them were Christ-like; slapping any one of them would have been a hazard, and, imho, rightly so.
Debating how much they need the slapping around might not be productive, regardless of how accurate and fun that might be.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 82 by Omnivorous, posted 11-28-2005 12:14 PM Omnivorous has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 86 by Omnivorous, posted 11-28-2005 12:35 PM bkelly has not replied

  
bkelly
Inactive Member


Message 119 of 151 (265319)
12-03-2005 6:28 PM
Reply to: Message 117 by iano
12-03-2005 9:47 AM


Re: Definition of Christian
Hello guys,
excuse me for butting in, but,...
jar writes:
So how can you tell if someone is a Christian?
iano writes:
...(on the "it takes one to know one" basis)...
I don't agree with the takes one to know one concept. For a simple example, consider psychologist and people that have a high level of what has been called emotional intelligence. These people have the ability to understand what motivate people better than most of us and do not have to be a (what-ever) in order to recognize a (what-ever).
Whey should this be different with determing if a person is a christian? What is there that a christian detect in a christian that a non christian cannot?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 117 by iano, posted 12-03-2005 9:47 AM iano has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 123 by iano, posted 12-05-2005 6:13 AM bkelly has replied

  
bkelly
Inactive Member


Message 126 of 151 (265854)
12-05-2005 6:58 PM
Reply to: Message 123 by iano
12-05-2005 6:13 AM


Re: Definition of Christian
Hello iano,
Much as I read your post, I cannot extract the concept: How can a christian detect if another person is christian or not? You say that a non christian cannot, so how can a christian do this? Please make it simple for me.
Thanks.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 123 by iano, posted 12-05-2005 6:13 AM iano has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 128 by macaroniandcheese, posted 12-05-2005 7:49 PM bkelly has not replied
 Message 133 by iano, posted 12-06-2005 11:04 AM bkelly has not replied

  
bkelly
Inactive Member


Message 138 of 151 (266210)
12-06-2005 9:05 PM
Reply to: Message 137 by TimChase
12-06-2005 4:11 PM


Re: Actually I may agree with iano
The only inescapable logic I can find is that other that from what a person claims, there is not way a christian can detect if another person is christian. Forget the analogies, if you actually knew of a way, you would state it. I agree, it is indeed quite simple.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 137 by TimChase, posted 12-06-2005 4:11 PM TimChase has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 141 by iano, posted 12-07-2005 9:16 AM bkelly has not replied

  
bkelly
Inactive Member


Message 143 of 151 (266525)
12-07-2005 5:41 PM
Reply to: Message 142 by jar
12-07-2005 10:55 AM


Back to the beginning of the circle
Hello jar,
Now it seems as through we have come full circle back to he OP.
At the time of writing 10,000 Christian clergymen of many denominations have endorsed this letter which denies a literalist interpretation of the Biblical creation stories and accepts evolution as valid science.
Now that we cannot distinguish between one christian and another, what does this mean for the christians that deny a literalist interpertation of the bible.
My interpertation is that those 10,000 clergy are leading the way for christians beginning to realize that liberal interpertation is not valid. This is progress. With luck and nuturing it might spread.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 142 by jar, posted 12-07-2005 10:55 AM jar has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024