Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
2 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,902 Year: 4,159/9,624 Month: 1,030/974 Week: 357/286 Day: 0/13 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   The Pyramids vis a vis the Flood
Taz
Member (Idle past 3321 days)
Posts: 5069
From: Zerus
Joined: 07-18-2006


Message 15 of 61 (472197)
06-20-2008 10:59 PM
Reply to: Message 1 by dbs944
06-20-2008 9:01 AM


Please point to me where it says in the bible that everyone that came after the flood were descendants of Noah. I just read the whole chapter again and I couldn't find anywhere where it says that. God told Noah and his family members to "be fruitful and multiply".
Look, God created Adam and Eve from dirt. I don't see any reason why God couldn't have created other people after the flood. Just like every history book, the bible couldn't have recorded EVERY event and EVERY person.

I'm trying to see things your way, but I can't put my head that far up my ass.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by dbs944, posted 06-20-2008 9:01 AM dbs944 has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 16 by Brian, posted 06-21-2008 1:42 AM Taz has replied
 Message 25 by bluegenes, posted 06-21-2008 11:38 PM Taz has replied

  
Taz
Member (Idle past 3321 days)
Posts: 5069
From: Zerus
Joined: 07-18-2006


Message 20 of 61 (472228)
06-21-2008 3:24 AM
Reply to: Message 16 by Brian
06-21-2008 1:42 AM


Brian writes:
If God was going to create people after the flood then why bother saving Noah and his family? Why bother saving all the animals?
Have you ever formatted your hard drive? You know for a fact that you will reinstall certain systems and add new files to the new OS. Yet, you insist on saving whatever you can from the old OS.
That's just one possibility. Obviously, God could do whatever He wanted. The question is why not save Noah and his family? Why not save some animal?
God could simply have started everything again rather than going through the ludicrous Flood scenario we read in Genesis.
Yes, He COULD have.

I'm trying to see things your way, but I can't put my head that far up my ass.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 16 by Brian, posted 06-21-2008 1:42 AM Brian has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 21 by dbs944, posted 06-21-2008 9:26 PM Taz has replied

  
Taz
Member (Idle past 3321 days)
Posts: 5069
From: Zerus
Joined: 07-18-2006


Message 22 of 61 (472367)
06-21-2008 11:07 PM
Reply to: Message 21 by dbs944
06-21-2008 9:26 PM


dbs944 writes:
If you were to have your HD reformatted, you wouldn't use any of the O/S that was causing problems, you'd use the original (A&E) and try not to screw it up again - or, you'd develop a whole new operating system. Keeping parts is sure to cause problems again unless you were sure they were good. If things were so bad God should have
1 - stared all over again with a new GoE - this time without the tempting tree and maybe creating Sam and Julie instead.
Don't tell me you've never reformatted and saved some backup files from the old OS.
2 - eliminated only the bad parts - making all the sinners disappear. That sure would have made the good people sit up and notice.
And I'm pretty sure if God had done what you proposed you'd be complaining why God didn't do it in more of a flashy way to get our attention.
Admit it. No matter how God had done it you'd be complaining anyway and suggest that you have a better way at doing it.
Edited by Taz, : No reason given.

I'm trying to see things your way, but I can't put my head that far up my ass.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 21 by dbs944, posted 06-21-2008 9:26 PM dbs944 has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 32 by dbs944, posted 06-22-2008 8:10 AM Taz has replied

  
Taz
Member (Idle past 3321 days)
Posts: 5069
From: Zerus
Joined: 07-18-2006


Message 24 of 61 (472371)
06-21-2008 11:21 PM
Reply to: Message 23 by bluescat48
06-21-2008 11:16 PM


Re: Simple hydrostatics is the answer.
I assure you, AnswersInGenitals is not a creationist.
Edited by Taz, : No reason given.

I'm trying to see things your way, but I can't put my head that far up my ass.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 23 by bluescat48, posted 06-21-2008 11:16 PM bluescat48 has not replied

  
Taz
Member (Idle past 3321 days)
Posts: 5069
From: Zerus
Joined: 07-18-2006


Message 27 of 61 (472378)
06-21-2008 11:49 PM
Reply to: Message 25 by bluegenes
06-21-2008 11:38 PM


Re: Reason?!
me writes:
Just like every history book, the bible couldn't have recorded EVERY event and EVERY person.
you writes:
True. Unless the author was omniscient.
I wasn't referring to the knowledge of the author. I was referring to the technical part of it. Just how would you suggest cramming everything about everything about every person that has ever lived in the entire span of human history into a book or series of books in a practical sense? Even today in the digital age such a detailed historic record would be unreasonable to ask for.

I'm trying to see things your way, but I can't put my head that far up my ass.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 25 by bluegenes, posted 06-21-2008 11:38 PM bluegenes has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 29 by bluegenes, posted 06-22-2008 12:05 AM Taz has replied

  
Taz
Member (Idle past 3321 days)
Posts: 5069
From: Zerus
Joined: 07-18-2006


Message 31 of 61 (472383)
06-22-2008 12:55 AM
Reply to: Message 29 by bluegenes
06-22-2008 12:05 AM


Re: Reason?!
bluegenes writes:
You have a point. I guess you'd have to be omnipotent.
Ok, how about you suggest a better way at recording the Biblical history that includes the entirety of human history right down to each individual person and every single detail in a small enough volume so that it could be passed down from one generation to the next.

I'm trying to see things your way, but I can't put my head that far up my ass.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 29 by bluegenes, posted 06-22-2008 12:05 AM bluegenes has not replied

  
Taz
Member (Idle past 3321 days)
Posts: 5069
From: Zerus
Joined: 07-18-2006


Message 33 of 61 (472422)
06-22-2008 10:29 AM
Reply to: Message 32 by dbs944
06-22-2008 8:10 AM


dbs944 writes:
IF He did it after the pyramids, where are the water marks inside the pyramids? Simple question.
Or, if He did it before the pyramids were built, who built them? Simple question.
I choose to dodge your questions.
Anyway, read my new proposed topic about the literalness of the bible here.

I'm trying to see things your way, but I can't put my head that far up my ass.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 32 by dbs944, posted 06-22-2008 8:10 AM dbs944 has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 35 by dbs944, posted 06-24-2008 1:23 PM Taz has replied

  
Taz
Member (Idle past 3321 days)
Posts: 5069
From: Zerus
Joined: 07-18-2006


Message 36 of 61 (472727)
06-24-2008 2:09 PM
Reply to: Message 35 by dbs944
06-24-2008 1:23 PM


dbs944, it's a question of faith. You want to go to the feary pit of hell or the eternal blissed heaven?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 35 by dbs944, posted 06-24-2008 1:23 PM dbs944 has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 37 by dbs944, posted 06-24-2008 2:50 PM Taz has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024