You're completely wrong. What is ungracious is to send young men and women to die in countries with no capacity to attack us or "threaten my freedoms" and then act like they're engaged in some great noble defense of freedom so politicians can profit from a state of war.
If you re-read what I actually said, you'll see that I never challenged the proposition quoted above. But being sent to fight and die in other countries is not the sum total of what soldiers, jar-heads, airmen, and sailors do.
If it wasn't clear, let me say that we can thank our veterans and service men for sacrifices that have
nothing to do with fighting in wars. I'm quite sure I made that point in my message.
They protect our freedom by sitting in a silo and never pressing a button, or by spending months on submarine patrol in the North Atlantic and never firing a torpedo or missile in anger, by securing our inter-coastal waterways, or by simply training hard and keeping fighting shape. None of that stuff deserves to be dismissed as nothing. And much of it comes at personal sacrifice of the type a life long civilian might not understand.
Your post is a complete straw man. Yeah, I'm a former submarine officer, but despite your disclaimer, you did benefit from what service men do, whether you deem to recognize it or not. Your suggestion that no service man had ever done anything to defend your freedom since WWII is completely off base.