The site you linked to is but one of many such sites that attempt to place a veneer of reason on something totally devoid of same, sites that imply that there was a world-wide flood within recent (the last 600,000 years or so) times. One is example is found in the fourth paragraph.
The Flood catastrophe of Noah's time was easily the most severe. At this time, our planet was caught within counter-dominating gravitational forces and magnetic fields, resulting in (1) much tidal upheaval within our oceans; (2) surging spasms or tides of lava (fluid magma) from within the Earth's thin crust; and (3) further discharges of an electrical nature.
At one, possibly two, of the assertions would have left easily discovered evidence, and the third is simply a nonsense statement.
Let's look at them.
(1) much tidal upheaval within our oceans;
That's just a nonsense statement. What quantity is "much"? What does tidal upheaval mean? Within our oceans? It just babble.
(2) surging spasms or tides of lava (fluid magma) from within the Earth's thin crust;
Again, mainly just nonsense phrases strung together, such as spasms or tides of lava. But if this were true, then we should be able to find a whole series of lava beds, located all over the world, all dating to about 4000 years ago. So to support this assertion, all a Classical Creationist would need to do is provaide the locations of all or a large number of such lava flows, all having been laid down within a one year period.
(3) further discharges of an electrical nature.
This too is simply a nonsense phrase. What does "discharges of an electrical nature" mean?
While Classic Biblical Creationists may well believe such stuff, it cannot be supported by any evidence yet provided.
When a link to a source begins with what should be obvious nonsense statements as a basic premise, how can anyone even consider anything that follows as worth of consideration?
Aslan is not a Tame Lion
™ Version 4.2