Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
4 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,913 Year: 4,170/9,624 Month: 1,041/974 Week: 0/368 Day: 0/11 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Supreme Court upholds Obamacare
New Cat's Eye
Inactive Member


Message 66 of 98 (667799)
07-12-2012 11:50 AM
Reply to: Message 58 by Theodoric
07-01-2012 5:28 PM


recent data on fleeing Canadians
Why then, so many coming across the border for health care, due to the wait in Canada for treatment?
But of course you have no evidence of this.
But I have evidence to refute this.
Link
Link
Your links use data from the 1990's. Here is a report that was just released that uses data from 2011, and they conclude:
quote:
Conclusion
In 2011, an estimated 46,159 Canadians received nonemergency medical treatment outside Canada. In some cases, these patients needed to leave Canada due to a lack of available resources or a lack of appropriate procedure/technology. In others, their departure will have been driven by a desire to return more quickly to their lives, to seek out superior quality care, or perhaps to save their own lives or avoid the risk of disability. Clearly, the number of Canadians who ultimately receive their medical care in other countries is not insignificant.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 58 by Theodoric, posted 07-01-2012 5:28 PM Theodoric has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 71 by Dr Adequate, posted 07-12-2012 12:43 PM New Cat's Eye has seen this message but not replied
 Message 72 by Theodoric, posted 07-12-2012 12:47 PM New Cat's Eye has replied

  
New Cat's Eye
Inactive Member


Message 67 of 98 (667802)
07-12-2012 12:05 PM


The Doctors' Opinions
What does it mean when the doctors are against it?
Almost 90% of them think medicine is on the wrong track.
Over 80% are thinking about quitting.
Over 60% say its getting harder to adhere to the Hippocratic oath.
From a recent survey of doctors
Looks bad to me.

Here's the general concludions and key findings from an article about the survey:
quote:
GENERAL CONCLUSIONS:
1.Almost unanimous that medicine is on the wrong track, and overwhelmingly blame the government;
2.Government-imposed solutions (PPACA, electronic health information) destined to fail;
3.Highest numbers ever opting out of Medicare or refuse Medicaid;
4.Vacuum in leadership in medical profession, feel abandoned by AMA & organized medicine;
5.Corporate medicine (including hospital and insurance companies) is intentionally trying to destroy private practice;
6.Doctors are pessimistic - failing financially & assume things will worsen;
7.See doctors and patients as the solution - not government;
8.Believe direct payment by patients will restore accountability & patient control;
9.Restored autonomy, elimination of government involvement, increased patient responsibility and free market reforms are solutions.
KEY FINDINGS
90% say the medical system is on the WRONG TRACK
83% say they are thinking about QUITTING
61% say the system challenges their ETHICS
85% say the patient-physician relationship is in a TAILSPIN
65% say GOVERNMENT INVOLVEMENT is most to blame for current problems
72% say individual insurance mandate will NOT result in improved access care
49% say they will STOP accepting Medicaid patients
74% say they will STOP ACCEPTING Medicare patients, or leave Medicare completely
52% say they would rather treat some Medicaid/Medicare patient for FREE
57% give the AMA a FAILING GRADE representing them
1 out of 3 doctors is HESITANT to voice their opinion
2 out of 3 say they are JUST SQUEAKING BY OR IN THE RED financially
95% say private practice is losing out to CORPORATE MEDICINE
80% say DOCTORS/MEDICAL PROFESSIONALS are most likely to help solve things
70% say REDUCING GOVERNMENT would be single best fix.
Edited by Catholic Scientist, : No reason given.

Replies to this message:
 Message 68 by Taq, posted 07-12-2012 12:25 PM New Cat's Eye has replied
 Message 70 by ooh-child, posted 07-12-2012 12:36 PM New Cat's Eye has replied
 Message 73 by crashfrog, posted 07-12-2012 12:52 PM New Cat's Eye has seen this message but not replied
 Message 74 by Theodoric, posted 07-12-2012 12:54 PM New Cat's Eye has seen this message but not replied
 Message 89 by Theodoric, posted 07-12-2012 4:39 PM New Cat's Eye has replied

  
New Cat's Eye
Inactive Member


Message 69 of 98 (667806)
07-12-2012 12:35 PM
Reply to: Message 68 by Taq
07-12-2012 12:25 PM


Re: The Doctors' Opinions
When I look at doctors as a group I don't see them working on a solution for affordable health care for all americans. They whinge, but refuse to engage.
So? Does that make their complaints unfounded?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 68 by Taq, posted 07-12-2012 12:25 PM Taq has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 81 by Taq, posted 07-12-2012 3:08 PM New Cat's Eye has replied

  
New Cat's Eye
Inactive Member


Message 75 of 98 (667822)
07-12-2012 1:48 PM
Reply to: Message 72 by Theodoric
07-12-2012 12:47 PM


Re: recent data on fleeing Canadians
At least you could have used a non-partisan groups study that wasn't using questionable methodology.
Fraser Institute
quote:
It has been described as politically conservative and right-libertarian....
and envisions "a free and prosperous world where individuals benefit from greater choice, competitive markets, and personal responsibility".
Really? You berate Buz for not having a source and when a source is provided you Poison the Well. tsk tsk
Their methodology is no different than creationism. They are looking for evidence to back up their goals. They are not following evidence to a conclusion. They have their conclusion and are looking for anything, even playing with statistics, to "prove" their stance.
Which was your methodology as well. Buz made a claim that you wanted to prove wrong so you claim you refuted it by Googling up some data from ~15 years ago
Their 'evidence" is a "waiting list survey" that they send to physicians. There is no independent verification of this data. Is it not possible that only like minded physicians participate? I know if my wife received a survey from the Heritage Institute she would throw it away. Without a a more comprehensive review of the methodology their numbers mean nothing.
But there are huge other factors too.
Look at their references. Not a single one is an independent reference. The author uses himself as a reference. Everyone of them refers to a Fraser Institute document.
You forgot the biggest factor: their results don't agree with your preconceived notion. Better attack the source!
Now lets look at the figures. 43,000 Canadians sought care outside of Canada. Canada has a population of about 33 million. I will let you figure the percentage. So if the Fraser institutes #'s a correct then miniscule # of Canadians are seeking healthcare out of Canada. Which is in direct support of my arguments and the links I provided. Thank you.
Actually, a better percentage would be that of those seeking medical attention rather than that of the entire population.
Now lets look at another point of this "study". You are using it to support the notion that Canadians are fleeing to the US for healthcare. I do not see anything about the US in your link. So this is of absolutely no support of your argument.
Of the times that people went to other countries, what percentage do you think were to the US? More than 90%?
A little aside.
Meh. Apples and Oranges. Those countries have a fraction of the population that we do.
So any evidence at all that Canadians are coming over to the US in droves for healthcare? Any evidence at all that a significant percentage of Canadians prefer the US system as opposed to theirs?
Why? You want to poison some more wells?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 72 by Theodoric, posted 07-12-2012 12:47 PM Theodoric has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 77 by Shield, posted 07-12-2012 2:03 PM New Cat's Eye has replied
 Message 86 by Theodoric, posted 07-12-2012 4:07 PM New Cat's Eye has seen this message but not replied
 Message 95 by Theodoric, posted 07-13-2012 8:31 AM New Cat's Eye has not replied

  
New Cat's Eye
Inactive Member


Message 76 of 98 (667823)
07-12-2012 1:50 PM
Reply to: Message 70 by ooh-child
07-12-2012 12:36 PM


Re: The Doctors' Opinions
I gather from the article that this was a blast fax w/ a 4% response rate. How accurate can those numbers really be? Color me skeptical.
You gotta be careful with any survey. For all we know, only the docs who were already pissed off were the ones who took the survey. I don't know if 4% is a good return or not. I'm not asking you to drop any skepticism.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 70 by ooh-child, posted 07-12-2012 12:36 PM ooh-child has not replied

  
New Cat's Eye
Inactive Member


Message 78 of 98 (667825)
07-12-2012 2:42 PM
Reply to: Message 77 by Shield
07-12-2012 2:03 PM


Re: recent data on fleeing Canadians
Meh. Apples and Oranges. Those countries have a fraction of the population that we do.
First, that not true. Germanys 80 million+ citizens is hardly a fraction. Neither is britains 60 mil+.
Well, those fractions would be about 1/4 and 1/5, respectively.
Second, why do you think that population size matter? Really, tell me.
It seems straight forward to me that the more people you've got to take care of, the harder its going to be. Should I think otherwise?
Only two countries have more people than the US; China and India (which have about 5x and 4x the population of the US, respectively) How's their healthcare rank? According to the WHO ranking, China is 144th and India 112th.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 77 by Shield, posted 07-12-2012 2:03 PM Shield has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 79 by Shield, posted 07-12-2012 2:55 PM New Cat's Eye has replied

  
New Cat's Eye
Inactive Member


Message 80 of 98 (667829)
07-12-2012 3:05 PM
Reply to: Message 79 by Shield
07-12-2012 2:55 PM


Re: recent data on fleeing Canadians
China has a per capita GDP of $5,413, India's $3,693 and the US? $48,386. See, thats why.
Germany has a rather more comparable GDP per capita at $43,741.
Does Germany have the same "1%" problem that the US has? What's the numbers for the people in the bottom 5% or so look like? How many poor, uneducated, and/or overweight people does Germany have? How's the environment compare? Geographical distribution? Population density?
There's a shit-pile of variables...
Comparing US healthcare to China or Indias, is comparing apple and oranges.. Comparing US healthcare with western europe healthcare makes sense.
Well I disagree and I'm not just going to take your word for it. ABE Clarification: I don't mean that I disagree that comparing to China or India is apples to oranges. I disagree with the second sentence.
Edited by Catholic Scientist, : see ABE

This message is a reply to:
 Message 79 by Shield, posted 07-12-2012 2:55 PM Shield has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 93 by Shield, posted 07-12-2012 7:58 PM New Cat's Eye has not replied

  
New Cat's Eye
Inactive Member


Message 82 of 98 (667831)
07-12-2012 3:20 PM
Reply to: Message 81 by Taq
07-12-2012 3:08 PM


Re: The Doctors' Opinions
So? Does that make their complaints unfounded?
It makes their complaints irrelevant.
I think they're still interesting. We kinda need the doctors in order to have healthcare...

This message is a reply to:
 Message 81 by Taq, posted 07-12-2012 3:08 PM Taq has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 83 by Jon, posted 07-12-2012 3:22 PM New Cat's Eye has replied
 Message 92 by Taq, posted 07-12-2012 7:47 PM New Cat's Eye has not replied

  
New Cat's Eye
Inactive Member


Message 84 of 98 (667833)
07-12-2012 3:26 PM
Reply to: Message 83 by Jon
07-12-2012 3:22 PM


Re: The Doctors' Opinions
We kinda need the doctors in order to have healthcare...
We don't need those doctors, though.
How do you know?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 83 by Jon, posted 07-12-2012 3:22 PM Jon has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 87 by Jon, posted 07-12-2012 4:14 PM New Cat's Eye has replied

  
New Cat's Eye
Inactive Member


Message 88 of 98 (667841)
07-12-2012 4:29 PM
Reply to: Message 87 by Jon
07-12-2012 4:14 PM


Re: The Doctors' Opinions
Because political views have nothing to do with a person's medical abilities.
Wait... then how would these doctors' political views mean that we don't need them?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 87 by Jon, posted 07-12-2012 4:14 PM Jon has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 94 by Jon, posted 07-12-2012 8:27 PM New Cat's Eye has not replied

  
New Cat's Eye
Inactive Member


Message 90 of 98 (667843)
07-12-2012 4:40 PM
Reply to: Message 89 by Theodoric
07-12-2012 4:39 PM


Re: The Doctors' Opinions
I think your preconceived beliefs have overtaken your ability to examine data critically.
Why?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 89 by Theodoric, posted 07-12-2012 4:39 PM Theodoric has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 91 by Theodoric, posted 07-12-2012 4:51 PM New Cat's Eye has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024