Well the only reason is will never happen is because the constitution says we can possess Arms.
I'm always interested in this thought process so if you could answer a couple of questions I (as a Brit with little experience with wanting to own firearms) would be intrigued.
Do you realistically think that the government will turn on American population?
Do you think if the government had the will and consent of the military that a host of civilian men and women with guns could do anything to stop them?
Why have other Western democratic governments with no population of armed civilians not taken over in the way you have described?
All the best.
The above ontological example models the zero premise to BB theory. It does so by applying the relative uniformity assumption that the alleged zero event eventually ontologically progressed from the compressed alleged sub-microscopic chaos to bloom/expand into all of the present observable order, more than it models the Biblical record evidence for the existence of Jehovah, the maximal Biblical god designer.
-Attributed to Buzsaw Message 53
The explain to them any scientific investigation that explains the existence of things qualifies as science and as an explanation
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 286
Does a query (thats a question Stile) that uses this physical reality, to look for an answer to its existence and properties become theoretical, considering its deductive conclusions are based against objective verifiable realities.
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 134
™ Version 4.2
(1)
