Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
4 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,906 Year: 4,163/9,624 Month: 1,034/974 Week: 361/286 Day: 4/13 Hour: 1/0


EvC Forum ⇒ Science Forums ⇒ Is It Science? ⇒

Meert / Brown Debate

Thread ▼ Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Meert / Brown Debate
CK
Member (Idle past 4157 days)
Posts: 3221
Joined: 07-04-2004

Normal Thread Display
Message 107 of 233 (216845)
06-14-2005 4:22 PM 		Reply to: Message 106 by randman
06-14-2005 4:16 PM

Re: What I'd like to know.
Put up or shut up?
​
it's called peer-review (and I'm sure he's got the normal atheistevilliehategodkisssatansbumhidetruth excuse most creationists have)! You think people are bad here? Brown should try jumping in that bear-pit.
​
This message has been edited by Charles Knight, 14-Jun-2005 04:23 PM
This message is a reply to:
 Message 106 by randman, posted 06-14-2005 4:16 PM randman has replied
Replies to this message:
 Message 109 by mark24, posted 06-14-2005 4:24 PM CK has not replied
 Message 110 by randman, posted 06-14-2005 4:25 PM CK has not replied
  
CK
Member (Idle past 4157 days)
Posts: 3221
Joined: 07-04-2004

Normal Thread Display
Message 227 of 233 (218068)
06-19-2005 3:54 PM 		Reply to: Message 226 by randman
06-19-2005 3:31 PM

Re: The real debate is going on all the time.
I've noticed that you offer lots of "IMHO" views and very little in the way of supporting material for your arguments - this walt brown thing is a case in point.
​
Do you ever plan to head over to one of the more suitable threads and explain WHY you think Brown's work has a case?
This message is a reply to:
 Message 226 by randman, posted 06-19-2005 3:31 PM randman has replied
Replies to this message:
 Message 228 by randman, posted 06-19-2005 4:03 PM CK has replied
  
CK
Member (Idle past 4157 days)
Posts: 3221
Joined: 07-04-2004

Normal Thread Display
Message 230 of 233 (218081)
06-19-2005 4:25 PM 		Reply to: Message 228 by randman
06-19-2005 4:03 PM

Re: The real debate is going on all the time.
No you misunderstand me - are you ever going to explain why you think his SCIENTIFIC case has a leg to stand on.
​
You MO seems to be (on a number of subjects) to say "well I think that X has a lot of merit" and that argue trival points for 100s of posts. How about you head to a science thread and we can thrash out the finer points of his actual "theory".
​
As for the litigation - does that hairshirt itch?
This message is a reply to:
 Message 228 by randman, posted 06-19-2005 4:03 PM randman has not replied
  
Date format: mm-dd-yyyy
Timezone: ET (US)
  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024