Both or neither.

quote:

---

I said the world's major religous views.

---

Then I'm afraid that creationism would lose out. It's not even held by a majority of Christians, and so surely doesn't count as a "major world religious view".

I know. I'm just being a trouble maker.

Evolution is slow, yes, but a very likely process based on basic scientific principles.And Jesus has never been disproved, yes, but neither has he been proven. There is far more evidence in favor of evolution than the existence of Jesus.

quote:

---

I agree that evolution in plants and bacteria happen - but not in huge jumps.

---

Good. Scientists don't believe that evolution happens in huge jumps. So there is a lot you agree on.

quote:

---

I agree that evolution in plants and bacteria happen - but not in huge jumps.

---

Is this really what you need? If several of their arguments are shown to be inaccurate or otherwise flawed, you won't see that as an indication that the rest of it is untrustworthy? We can start by rebutting each of their points, one-by-one, but as long as their is one point that hasn't been rebutted you'll still consider them a trustworthy source?How many lies need to be exposed before you believe someone is a liar?