|
Author
|
Topic: Dating from the Adams and Eves Threads
|
Nighttrain
Member (Idle past 4023 days) Posts: 1512 From: brisbane,australia Joined: 06-08-2004
|
|
Message 4 of 300 (269348)
12-14-2005 6:10 PM
|
Reply to: Message 1 by NosyNed
12-14-2005 5:39 PM
|
|
Aussie specimen
Hi, Ned, I hope Golfer is not going to quote the famous(?)Aussie geologist Andrew Snelling, who writes up dating correlations in geo publications and rubbishes dating methods on Creo sites like AIG.
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 1 by NosyNed, posted 12-14-2005 5:39 PM | | NosyNed has not replied |
| Replies to this message: | | | Message 6 by johnfolton, posted 12-14-2005 7:07 PM | | Nighttrain has not replied |
|
Nighttrain
Member (Idle past 4023 days) Posts: 1512 From: brisbane,australia Joined: 06-08-2004
|
Re: Overturned strata
I think you are mixing in your beer drinking research here. Man, you know how to cut a feller down to size, Moose. 
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 5 by Minnemooseus, posted 12-14-2005 6:54 PM | | Minnemooseus has not replied |
|
Nighttrain
Member (Idle past 4023 days) Posts: 1512 From: brisbane,australia Joined: 06-08-2004
|
Re: Creationists exposing the falicies of indirect dating
Hi, G. You realise 14C cannot date into the millions of years, don`t you? Do you also realise that while there might be an occasional extra ring for a given year in one climatic condition, tree rings are correlated with other species thousands of miles away where similar beneficial conditions are unlikely to exist at the same time?
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 14 by johnfolton, posted 12-15-2005 12:41 AM | | johnfolton has not replied |
|
Nighttrain
Member (Idle past 4023 days) Posts: 1512 From: brisbane,australia Joined: 06-08-2004
|
Re: References
Re the link;
Don`t you think it a tad ironic, even hilarious, that to disprove radioactive dating and champion the cause of Yecism, that the samples were sent for 'accelerator mass spectrometry' analysis? And that the results were held up as---um--gospel?
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 12 by johnfolton, posted 12-14-2005 11:59 PM | | johnfolton has not replied |
|
Nighttrain
Member (Idle past 4023 days) Posts: 1512 From: brisbane,australia Joined: 06-08-2004
|
|
|
Message 59 of 300 (270147)
12-16-2005 6:19 PM
|
Reply to: Message 51 by Coragyps
12-16-2005 9:01 AM
|
|
Re: Sandwich dating and c14
What in Sam Tunket are you talking about? What "marine leachate contamination" was there in freshwater Lake Suigetsu that soaked carbon-14 preferentially to carbon-12 out of cellulose in leaves and twigs, From the saltwater Flood leachate,CG. Get with it. Or maybe Goddidit. Or it might be something I haven`t thought of yet------
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 51 by Coragyps, posted 12-16-2005 9:01 AM | | Coragyps has not replied |
|
Nighttrain
Member (Idle past 4023 days) Posts: 1512 From: brisbane,australia Joined: 06-08-2004
|
|
|
Message 73 of 300 (270381)
12-17-2005 5:59 PM
|
Reply to: Message 72 by RAZD
12-17-2005 2:21 PM
|
|
Re: Sandwich dating and c14
Give it up, Razd. If God faked the age of the earth, He probably faked the correlations, too.
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 72 by RAZD, posted 12-17-2005 2:21 PM | | RAZD has not replied |
|
Nighttrain
Member (Idle past 4023 days) Posts: 1512 From: brisbane,australia Joined: 06-08-2004
|
Re: C14 and the Layer Cake
I'll agree with you that horizontal lens marks in limestone supports that the waters started pressing out after the flood waters washed off the earth. Any gasing summerged would of gased upwards to the nearest horizontal lens devoid of water and vent to atmosphere.
So if we find an impermeable horizontal lens full of gas with 14C, we can date Flood-time?
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 103 by johnfolton, posted 12-19-2005 8:54 PM | | johnfolton has not replied |
|
Nighttrain
Member (Idle past 4023 days) Posts: 1512 From: brisbane,australia Joined: 06-08-2004
|
Liquefaction of the uprising
The varves expressed as the solid line are evidences supporting the creationists biblical flood. The varves expressed as the non solid line is more expressed by the liquefaction anaerobic sorting of the humic clay and flood diatom sediments. What if the solid line formed a circle due to osmotic pressure of the marine salts, or even a spiral connected by a straight line caused by the liquefaction of the uprising gas from the boiling waters of the fountains of the deep. This would explain the presence of carbonates in diatoms who missed the annual bloom, but due to deposited shells, were impervious to the rising liquefied gas from the boiling waters of the fountains of the deep. Carbonates extracted from the clays which originated in the slowly-moving (in a horizontal direction) of the pre-Flood mantle as explained in Jeremiah 72:11. Thus, the related clay(shells)(carbonates) would have an inverted correlation with tree-rings as evidenced of larches from the Black Sea region which have been dated to the exact time of the Flood. Give or take a couple of years. Or more. Or less.
|
Nighttrain
Member (Idle past 4023 days) Posts: 1512 From: brisbane,australia Joined: 06-08-2004
|
|
|
Message 180 of 300 (272710)
12-25-2005 10:35 PM
|
Reply to: Message 177 by Coragyps
12-25-2005 10:08 PM
|
|
Re: Liquefaction of the uprising
Feel free to call me in anytime, CG.
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 177 by Coragyps, posted 12-25-2005 10:08 PM | | Coragyps has not replied |
|
™ Version 4.2