Bertot writes:
Lets take a guess at who the likely suspects are in this situation.
why guess when we have evidence pointing to the culprits?
Since as I said before, its is not clear in these areas always who the culprets are
So, the FBI got it wrong when they pointed to Al-Qaeda?
the most likely suspects would be those that support and harbor terrorists
And Saddam Hussain did this?
and advance thier aggression twords other countries to control regions and the such like.
Ok, Iraq did this. But guess what, so did America.
Were there other countries in this area that supported and backed these terrorist acts, ofcourse
Yes, Pakistan comes to mind, or Saudi Arabia.
But I hardly think, inactivity and speculation would be the course of action.
I never said it was, but there is nothing pointing to Iraq, absolutely nothing.
The best we can do is trust that our leaders have the coreect information provided by the sources they employ.
Even when there are various experts who say they are wrong? We are to ignore them and trust our government blidly?
Now since it has not been proven to the contrary in this instance, it would seem that those actions were justified and correct.
It has not been proven to the contrary that Bush didn't orchestrate 911 himself. Should we murder Bush? (Note, I'm not saying he did, just that something that has not been proven not to have done something is a pretty lousy strategy)
Ouestion. Do you really believe that all the terrorists we capture and all the intelligence information we gather is faulty or incorrect?
No, I never said it was. You asserted Saddam had something to do with 911, I asked for evidence of this, since I have heard of no such evidence.
Not that they wont respond again, but there is no telling how much these actions have stopped and prevented other actions to the contrary.
Or inspired people to take even more actions against you....
I hunt for the truth
™ Version 4.2