"For those wondering what I'm waffling about, Freds definition of new information is new information = the presence of a new algorithm (coding sequence) in the genome that codes for a new useful feature."
--Also in my two replies toward Fred's analysis demonstrates how this is asking what is unlikely to be given. It is however important to note, that the example of nylon digestibility basically does create conflict with assertions on the non-existence of the appearance of a genuinely new algorithm.
--There is a point which apparently is biasedly dismissed with an essential lack of discussion or dispute from apparent contradiction with initial beliefs. Creationists must stop scrambling for what they wish were veracious rather than what is. Something which I have realized and I should hope that this realization is swept through the creationist bubble that
we need to quite being anti-evolutionary and start being pro-YECist. There is an increasingly vast lack of knowledge and experimentation working within the alternative framework which needs to start being looked over. Rather far too many are piling up on every Science article or quote which displays any suspicion for correction or dispute against an Evolutionary theoretical situation[Not that thats necessarely bad, it's just that most people get carried away on this one]. Believe me, there is more than plenty to be worked on.
-WB Chase
& Cheers
------------------
[This message has been edited by TrueCreation, 07-17-2002]
[This message has been edited by TrueCreation, 07-17-2002]