Well, well, well. Welcome back, ChaseNelson. It took me some time to dig up that old thread, since you never replied to my last post.
As to your assertion that I failed to answer any of your questions, I think it would behoove you to re-read the thread in question.
Please respond to:
1. my last paragraph on specified complexity and its problems
2. my citation of Dawkins and why your argument concerning what he said is erroneous
3. my examples of the immune system and cochlear system from the previous post which you have failed to address
4. the three references I provided concerning the evolution of biological information
5. my challenge to you to either accept MY definition of information or provide an operational one of your own
As to your claim that I failed to respond to the final paragraph you cut-and-pasted from some creationist website, I stand by my contention that the paragraph has NOTHING to do with the topic - information and biology - and is rather a transparent attempt to divert the discussion into an abiogenesis/origin of chirality and the availability of oxygen in the early atmosphere. You don't even cite the references on your own - one of them ends in the middle of a sentence, showing not only didn't you READ the references, but merely cut and pasted the whole argument from someone else.
If you want to discuss - we'll discuss. However, this time around there's going to be absolutely no tolerance on my part for straight cut and paste. If you can't synopsize in your own words the arguments, then all you're doing is re-hashing something someone else wrote - and which you may or may not understand.
If you don't want a discussion under those constraints, fine. At least I won't have to wonder for three months what's going on.