Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,889 Year: 4,146/9,624 Month: 1,017/974 Week: 344/286 Day: 0/65 Hour: 0/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   On feeling sorry for people
Faith 
Suspended Member (Idle past 1472 days)
Posts: 35298
From: Nevada, USA
Joined: 10-06-2001


Message 46 of 300 (341975)
08-21-2006 2:12 PM
Reply to: Message 43 by NeuroCycle
08-21-2006 2:03 PM


I can't speak for Robinrohan, but I really don't like talking to strangers, not that socially adept to just go up and talk to people. Homeless, mentally ill, handicapped no matter. Do I feel bad for them? Yes I do, will chatting with them brighten up their day? Maybe, I don't know.
Me too. We aren't all chatters. In fact when I do make efforts to be friendly they often go wrong. I'm likely to offend someone without having any idea how it happened. I once tried helping a blind person who was walking into the side of a building, tried to direct her around to the front door. She snapped at me as if I'd insulted her. I have no idea what I said or did that got that reaction. I remember it as her resenting my trying to help at all. Doesn't encourage me to be helpful in future. Doesn't mean I don't care, just means I am not socially adept at some kinds of interaction. Better do nothing than do something that makes the situation worse.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 43 by NeuroCycle, posted 08-21-2006 2:03 PM NeuroCycle has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 48 by docpotato, posted 08-21-2006 2:21 PM Faith has not replied

robinrohan
Inactive Member


Message 47 of 300 (341976)
08-21-2006 2:13 PM
Reply to: Message 44 by Heathen
08-21-2006 2:09 PM


Re: Creavolution
I guess I'm really not understanding how critisicm of your thoughts in this case can be labelled PC, or how your thoughts can be considered un-PC.
OK. There's a thread on PC, if one wishes to discuss it there. "PC" is a vague term, to be sure: hard to pin down.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 44 by Heathen, posted 08-21-2006 2:09 PM Heathen has not replied

docpotato
Member (Idle past 5075 days)
Posts: 334
From: Portland, OR
Joined: 07-18-2003


Message 48 of 300 (341980)
08-21-2006 2:21 PM
Reply to: Message 46 by Faith
08-21-2006 2:12 PM


This kind-of thing happened to me a lot too and I similarly stopped making any effort.
Lately I'm beginning to think that the reason I messed something up by offering help or friendliness was because I had approached the situation with an assumption: "this person needs help" or "won't they be glad I helped them" kind-of thoughts. It probably oozed out of me like so much condenscending cheese.
Edited by docpotato, : No reason given.

The American Drivel Review

This message is a reply to:
 Message 46 by Faith, posted 08-21-2006 2:12 PM Faith has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 56 by ringo, posted 08-21-2006 2:47 PM docpotato has not replied
 Message 110 by Omnivorous, posted 08-21-2006 7:52 PM docpotato has not replied

Faith 
Suspended Member (Idle past 1472 days)
Posts: 35298
From: Nevada, USA
Joined: 10-06-2001


Message 49 of 300 (341981)
08-21-2006 2:24 PM
Reply to: Message 44 by Heathen
08-21-2006 2:09 PM


attempt at definition
I guess I'm really not understanding how critisicm of your thoughts in this case can be labelled PC, or how your thoughts can be considered un-PC.
I suppose there's a need here for a stab at a definition -- which may be acceptable providing nobody takes first efforts as final.
In my experience it has something to do with an angry moralistic response to normal innocent human behavior. In its purest form it has a Marxist framework that defines an Oppressor and an Oppressed, a Victim and his Victimizer. The Victim in the Marxist version may be a veteran in a wheelchair or any race other than white, or a female as opposed to a male and the like, but it varies quite a bit depending on context.
The Oppressor or Victimizer is treated as unmitigated evil, denounced in the most venomous indignant tones, described as a Nazi quite frequently, although he may have done nothing more than blunder out onto a patio where some sad-looking veterans were sitting, feel sorry for them in the privacy of his own mind and leave after a few minutes.
It's moralism extended into arenas it has no right to be, attacking people for merely being human with all their faults and bumblings, or attacking people for thoughtful opinions that happen to clash with the PC opinion. This happens a lot. It's not just a disagreement, it's an attack on the person.
It's risky to attempt an abstract definition of this, but that's all that occurs to me at the moment.
Edited by Faith, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 44 by Heathen, posted 08-21-2006 2:09 PM Heathen has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 52 by Heathen, posted 08-21-2006 2:35 PM Faith has replied

jar
Member (Idle past 422 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 50 of 300 (341982)
08-21-2006 2:25 PM
Reply to: Message 45 by robinrohan
08-21-2006 2:11 PM


If you want to feel you were criticized then OKAY!
I cannot be held responsible for what you believe robin. If you wish to feel I criticized you then fine, I have no problem with that.
Whatever makes you happy.

Aslan is not a Tame Lion

This message is a reply to:
 Message 45 by robinrohan, posted 08-21-2006 2:11 PM robinrohan has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 54 by NeuroCycle, posted 08-21-2006 2:38 PM jar has replied

ringo
Member (Idle past 440 days)
Posts: 20940
From: frozen wasteland
Joined: 03-23-2005


Message 51 of 300 (341985)
08-21-2006 2:29 PM
Reply to: Message 43 by NeuroCycle
08-21-2006 2:03 PM


Well, congratulations on missing my point completely.
NeuroCycle writes:
I really don't like talking to strangers, not that socially adept to just go up and talk to people.
How "socially adept" do you have to be to talk to people at the looney bin? They're in there because they're not socially adept. They may not have a tight grip on reality, but they can spot a socially adept phoney.
... if I don't take time to chat with the local homeless guy I sure as hell better not get critized for it.
It isn't about criticizing you. It's about the oppurtunities you miss - oppurtunities to interact with your fellow creatures. It's part of the experience of being alive.
If your fellow creatures get something out of it too, that's just a bonus.
What you did was honorable and very kind-hearted....
Still missing the point.
There's nothing "honorable" or "kind-hearted" about just enjoying life. My whole point is that I didn't do anything. I didn't offer money. I didn't pat them on the head and say, "Good dog."
I just treated them the same way I would treat anybody else.
Treating somebody different because they "are" different is a sin of omission.

Help scientific research in your spare time. No cost. No obligation.
Join the World Community Grid with Team EvC

This message is a reply to:
 Message 43 by NeuroCycle, posted 08-21-2006 2:03 PM NeuroCycle has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 53 by Faith, posted 08-21-2006 2:38 PM ringo has replied
 Message 66 by NeuroCycle, posted 08-21-2006 3:30 PM ringo has replied

Heathen
Member (Idle past 1311 days)
Posts: 1067
From: Brizzle
Joined: 09-20-2005


Message 52 of 300 (341986)
08-21-2006 2:35 PM
Reply to: Message 49 by Faith
08-21-2006 2:24 PM


Re: attempt at definition
faith writes:
In my experience it has something to do with an angry moralistic response to normal innocent human behavior.
You are describing PC exactly how I would describe right wing christianity
Faith writes:
In its purest form it has a Marxist framework that defines an Oppressor and an Oppressed, a Victim and his Victimizer. The Victim in the Marxist version may be a veteran in a wheelchair or any race other than white, or a female as opposed to a male and the like, but it varies quite a bit depending on context.
So in your eyes PC = Marxism
Faith writes:
The Oppressor or Victimizer is treated as unmitigated evil, denounced in the most venomous indignant tones, described as a Nazi quite frequently,
again, what you are describing here seems to me to be a right-wing Characature of PC, nothing more.
faith writes:
or attacking people for thoughtful opinions that happen to clash with the PC opinion.
There are MANY belief/moral systems that attack others for clashing with their opinion. This is not peculiar to PC.
My parents, for instance, are very un-PC, not malicious, not evil. But often say very inappropriate things, it's their way and was normal in their day.
But in no way should it be accepted.
It is, however it was intended, offensive. Pure and simple. the world to day is a very different place, and we need to adjust our behaviours to suit.
Edited by Creavolution, : grammar check

This message is a reply to:
 Message 49 by Faith, posted 08-21-2006 2:24 PM Faith has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 55 by Faith, posted 08-21-2006 2:47 PM Heathen has not replied

Faith 
Suspended Member (Idle past 1472 days)
Posts: 35298
From: Nevada, USA
Joined: 10-06-2001


Message 53 of 300 (341988)
08-21-2006 2:38 PM
Reply to: Message 51 by ringo
08-21-2006 2:29 PM


It isn't about criticizing you. It's about the oppurtunities you miss - oppurtunities to interact with your fellow creatures. It's part of the experience of being alive.
Typical PC I want to say but maybe it isn't QUITE apt in this case.
Typical moralism of the modern sort in any case. Yes it IS about criticizing him. He SHOULD take such opportunities is implicit. He SHOULD want to "interact with his fellow creatures," SHOULD not pass up this "part of the experience of being alive." He's MISSING OUT. One of the Hundred Commandments, Don't Miss Out on Opportunities to Interact.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 51 by ringo, posted 08-21-2006 2:29 PM ringo has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 57 by ringo, posted 08-21-2006 2:49 PM Faith has not replied

NeuroCycle
Inactive Member


Message 54 of 300 (341989)
08-21-2006 2:38 PM
Reply to: Message 50 by jar
08-21-2006 2:25 PM


Re: If you want to feel you were criticized then OKAY!
I am jumping in again.
Now you feel that you didn't critize him. Him and I do.
Question: Do you think what Robinrohan did was ok?
In your post to him it was not noted that in anyway did you agree with his actions. The whole content was a - you should of done this/that and you would of been a better person for it - implying (without being a hypocrit) that you would of talked to these men. So I took that as an underhanded "I am better then you" attitude.
When you obviously put more stock in one position and find a fault with the one he took how can you not call the criticizing?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 50 by jar, posted 08-21-2006 2:25 PM jar has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 60 by jar, posted 08-21-2006 2:59 PM NeuroCycle has replied

Faith 
Suspended Member (Idle past 1472 days)
Posts: 35298
From: Nevada, USA
Joined: 10-06-2001


Message 55 of 300 (341991)
08-21-2006 2:47 PM
Reply to: Message 52 by Heathen
08-21-2006 2:35 PM


Re: attempt at definition
Yes, PC, the purest kind, does derive from Cultural Marxism, but it has many other variations.
In a way, yes, it is an aping and in some cases a reversal of Christian principles. You simply define homosexuality as normal instead of a sin and there you have it. If someone considers it a sin they get the moral opprobrium that sin deserves. This analogy breaks down quickly too though.
But this gets us off topic.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 52 by Heathen, posted 08-21-2006 2:35 PM Heathen has not replied

ringo
Member (Idle past 440 days)
Posts: 20940
From: frozen wasteland
Joined: 03-23-2005


Message 56 of 300 (341992)
08-21-2006 2:47 PM
Reply to: Message 48 by docpotato
08-21-2006 2:21 PM


docpotato writes:
I had approached the situation with an assumption: "this person needs help"
The best way to "help" a blind person or a person in a wheelchair is to stay the hell out of their way. They wouldn't be out on the street if they couldn't take care of themselves.
Everybody needs help sometimes, able-bodied or not - but it's best to wait for them to ask. I have often been asked for help by blind people, people in wheelchairs, etc.
Maybe I'm just a helpful-looking guy.
If they don't ask, I assume that:
  1. they dont need help
  2. somebody else will help them (and take the flak if they don't want help).

Help scientific research in your spare time. No cost. No obligation.
Join the World Community Grid with Team EvC

This message is a reply to:
 Message 48 by docpotato, posted 08-21-2006 2:21 PM docpotato has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 58 by NeuroCycle, posted 08-21-2006 2:50 PM ringo has not replied

ringo
Member (Idle past 440 days)
Posts: 20940
From: frozen wasteland
Joined: 03-23-2005


Message 57 of 300 (341993)
08-21-2006 2:49 PM
Reply to: Message 53 by Faith
08-21-2006 2:38 PM


Faith writes:
He SHOULD want to "interact with his fellow creatures," SHOULD not pass up this "part of the experience of being alive." He's MISSING OUT.
If that's Political Correctness, I'm all for it.

Help scientific research in your spare time. No cost. No obligation.
Join the World Community Grid with Team EvC

This message is a reply to:
 Message 53 by Faith, posted 08-21-2006 2:38 PM Faith has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 62 by robinrohan, posted 08-21-2006 3:04 PM ringo has replied

NeuroCycle
Inactive Member


Message 58 of 300 (341994)
08-21-2006 2:50 PM
Reply to: Message 56 by ringo
08-21-2006 2:47 PM


docpotato writes:
I had approached the situation with an assumption: "this person needs help"
The best way to "help" a blind person or a person in a wheelchair is to stay the hell out of their way. They wouldn't be out on the street if they couldn't take care of themselves.
Everybody needs help sometimes, able-bodied or not - but it's best to wait for them to ask. I have often been asked for help by blind people, people in wheelchairs, etc.
Maybe I'm just a helpful-looking guy.
If they don't ask, I assume that:
  1. they dont need help
  2. somebody else will help them (and take the flak if they don't want help).
Totally agree.
Edited by NeuroCycle, : format edit

This message is a reply to:
 Message 56 by ringo, posted 08-21-2006 2:47 PM ringo has not replied

Dan Carroll
Inactive Member


Message 59 of 300 (342000)
08-21-2006 2:56 PM
Reply to: Message 9 by robinrohan
08-21-2006 11:41 AM


Being a nihilist doesn't have anything to do with recognizing needs.
It's a certain viewpoint--an imminently reasonable one, by the way--about the human condition.
Any time now, I guess.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 9 by robinrohan, posted 08-21-2006 11:41 AM robinrohan has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 61 by robinrohan, posted 08-21-2006 3:00 PM Dan Carroll has not replied
 Message 109 by Omnivorous, posted 08-21-2006 7:33 PM Dan Carroll has not replied

jar
Member (Idle past 422 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 60 of 300 (342002)
08-21-2006 2:59 PM
Reply to: Message 54 by NeuroCycle
08-21-2006 2:38 PM


Re: If you want to feel you were criticized then OKAY!
Question: Do you think what Robinrohan did was ok?
Was it okay? Sure. He is robin.
In your post to him it was not noted that in anyway did you agree with his actions.
Right, I don't agree with his actions.
When you obviously put more stock in one position and find a fault with the one he took how can you not call the criticizing?
All I did was present an alternative series of actions. I believe this is a discussion board. When someone starts a thread usually it is to discuss the contents of the opening post.

Aslan is not a Tame Lion

This message is a reply to:
 Message 54 by NeuroCycle, posted 08-21-2006 2:38 PM NeuroCycle has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 63 by NeuroCycle, posted 08-21-2006 3:18 PM jar has replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024