Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
4 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,901 Year: 4,158/9,624 Month: 1,029/974 Week: 356/286 Day: 12/65 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Video of Iraqi Insurgent being interogatted
Tal
Member (Idle past 5706 days)
Posts: 1140
From: Fort Bragg, NC
Joined: 12-29-2004


Message 16 of 134 (235911)
08-23-2005 9:58 AM
Reply to: Message 14 by berberry
08-23-2005 9:35 AM


Re: I'm sorry, too
Let me correct a few of your apologies.
I am sorry that this administration lied to us about WMD in order to gain support for a war they had no business starting, no clue how to conduct and no plan for winning.
Everyone lied. Including the UN and the Clinton Administration.
Gonna hold their feet to the fire?
I am sorry that this administration lied to us by saying that this war would last "weeks rather than months".
It did. We won against Saddam's forces. We are now in an insurgency. Look up the definition.
I am sorry that this administration sends other people's sons and daughters off to fight this war without proper armour.
You can't even get into theater without body armor, so this is false.
I am sorry that this administration will stop at nothing to silence opposition to its war-making policies; not even smearing the name of a fallen soldier's grieving mother is too low for them.
ROFL!!!
There's a grieving mother there!
Oh, and what has this administration done to silence her? Last I saw, she was the most mentioned person in the Media.
I am sorry that this administration has sufficient hubris to believe it can win this war, but not quite so much that it is willing to send its own sons and daughters to fight in it.
You disappoint me, but you don't suprise me. No war is noble as far as you all are concerned. The US is guilty. This argument is tiresome, boring, and specious. Why didn't the president's daughters go? It's a volunteer force! The president didn't "send" Cindy Sheehan's son over there; he volunteered. If she is doing anything, she is sullying his memory. She is making his life worthless. She is making what he volunteered to do worthless, and you guys, you don't see this. There are sons, there are family members of elected officials in Washington who have been and are in Iraq. It's not a great number, but they are there. But it's not a draft, and the president can't choose who goes. It's a volunteer army and everything that you said is doing a disservice to those who have volunteered to represent this country and serve this country and their families, and if I were you, I would be ashamed and try to grow up and get a little maturity.

Tired of the opposite sex? Want to turn your favorite football player into a raging homsexual? Then purchase your Gay-Gene Cattle Prod! One Zap from the GGCP will turn the Gay Gene off or on at your whim. So if you want your wife to get some hot girl on girl action, the Gay-Gene Cattle Prod is for you! *not intended for use on children*

This message is a reply to:
 Message 14 by berberry, posted 08-23-2005 9:35 AM berberry has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 17 by deerbreh, posted 08-23-2005 10:23 AM Tal has replied
 Message 18 by berberry, posted 08-23-2005 10:25 AM Tal has replied

  
deerbreh
Member (Idle past 2921 days)
Posts: 882
Joined: 06-22-2005


Message 17 of 134 (235928)
08-23-2005 10:23 AM
Reply to: Message 16 by Tal
08-23-2005 9:58 AM


Re: I'm sorry, too
Oh, and what has this administration done to silence her?
They don't need to do anything as long as they have friends like you who are willing to post photoshopped slanders, now do they?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 16 by Tal, posted 08-23-2005 9:58 AM Tal has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 20 by Tal, posted 08-23-2005 10:48 AM deerbreh has replied

  
berberry
Inactive Member


Message 18 of 134 (235929)
08-23-2005 10:25 AM
Reply to: Message 16 by Tal
08-23-2005 9:58 AM


Re: I'm sorry, too
Tal writes me:
quote:
Everyone lied. Including the UN and the Clinton Administration.
True enough, and you and I might find some degree of agreement if we were to review the Clinton administration and the history of the UN. But that isn't the subject at hand, and as far as Clinton was concerned I believe he did suffer a blot on his escutcheon, if nothing else. No such fate seems to await Bush, but there is a crucial difference in the lies of the one and the lies of the other. The lies of only one of them were used to start a war.
Hell, even Martha Stewart lied. But wait, oh yeah, she had to pay for those lies, didn't she? She even went to prison. And how many deaths have resulted from her lies?
quote:
It did. We won against Saddam's forces. We are now in an insurgency.
And who says this war is nothing like Vietnam? By your reckoning, we won that, too.
quote:
You can't even get into theater without body armor, so this is false.
No need for armoured vehicles, then?
You get America out of Iraq and Israel out of Palestine and you'll stop terrorism.
We're supposed to be shocked by this? She's probably right. I'm not sure that would be our best policy, but the fact that she said it certainly doesn't justify the smear campaign that's been launched against her.
I realize that a number of left-wing groups are supporting her. You people should feel free to attack those groups with all you've got. But Cindy Sheehan is a grieving mother, and where I come from you don't ridicule a grieving mother. You wouldn't do it to Beth Holloway Twitty and you wouldn't do it to Cindy Sheehan. You don't understand one goddamned thing that woman is going through and you have absolutely no right to judge her.
Attack moveon.org all you want. Leave Cindy the hell alone. I see you're from Kentucky, but you sir are no Southern gentleman!

"I think younger workers first of all, younger workers have been promised benefits the government promises that have been promised, benefits that we can't keep. That's just the way it is." George W. Bush, May 4, 2005

This message is a reply to:
 Message 16 by Tal, posted 08-23-2005 9:58 AM Tal has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 19 by Tal, posted 08-23-2005 10:45 AM berberry has replied
 Message 29 by Monk, posted 08-23-2005 12:05 PM berberry has replied

  
Tal
Member (Idle past 5706 days)
Posts: 1140
From: Fort Bragg, NC
Joined: 12-29-2004


Message 19 of 134 (235943)
08-23-2005 10:45 AM
Reply to: Message 18 by berberry
08-23-2005 10:25 AM


Re: I'm sorry, too
And who says this war is nothing like Vietnam? By your reckoning, we won that, too.
It is nothing like Vietnam.
No need for armoured vehicles, then?
You go to war with the Army you have, not the Army you want to have. And yes, they've upgraded 99% of the vehicles in operation over there with armor.
But Cindy Sheehan is a grieving mother
No she isn't. She's a political activist that is pissing on her son's grave.
Let's see what she was saying back in April before her son died.
"We are not waging a war on terror in this country. We’re waging a war of terror. The biggest terrorist in the world is George W. Bush!"
So declared Cindy Sheehan earlier this year during a rally at San Francisco State University.
Sheehan, who is demanding a second meeting with Bush, stated: "We are waging a nuclear war in Iraq right now. That country is contaminated. It will be contaminated for practically eternity now."
Sheehan unleashed a foul-mouth tirade on April 27, 2005:
"They’re a bunch of fucking hypocrites! And we need to, we just need to rise up..." Sheehan said of the Bush administration.
"If George Bush believes his rhetoric and his bullshit, that this is a war for freedom and democracy, that he is spreading freedom and democracy, does he think every person he kills makes Iraq more free?"
"The whole world is damaged. Our humanity is damaged. If he thinks that it’s so important for Iraq to have a U.S.-imposed sense of freedom and democracy, then he needs to sign up his two little party-animal girls. They need to go to this war."
"We want our country back and, if we have to impeach everybody from George Bush down to the person who picks up dog shit in Washington, we will impeach all those people."
Yep..that's a grieving mother.
Attack moveon.org all you want. Leave Cindy the hell alone. I see you're from Kentucky, but you sir are no Southern gentleman!
Bullcrap. She can't use her son's death to promote her political activism and then expect to be shielded from rebutalls because she is a grieving mother. She doesn't get a pass and can't have it both ways.

Tired of the opposite sex? Want to turn your favorite football player into a raging homsexual? Then purchase your Gay-Gene Cattle Prod! One Zap from the GGCP will turn the Gay Gene off or on at your whim. So if you want your wife to get some hot girl on girl action, the Gay-Gene Cattle Prod is for you! *not intended for use on children*

This message is a reply to:
 Message 18 by berberry, posted 08-23-2005 10:25 AM berberry has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 21 by Chiroptera, posted 08-23-2005 10:49 AM Tal has not replied
 Message 22 by deerbreh, posted 08-23-2005 10:50 AM Tal has not replied
 Message 23 by berberry, posted 08-23-2005 10:55 AM Tal has not replied
 Message 28 by Yaro, posted 08-23-2005 11:24 AM Tal has replied

  
Tal
Member (Idle past 5706 days)
Posts: 1140
From: Fort Bragg, NC
Joined: 12-29-2004


Message 20 of 134 (235945)
08-23-2005 10:48 AM
Reply to: Message 17 by deerbreh
08-23-2005 10:23 AM


Re: I'm sorry, too
They don't need to do anything as long as they have friends like you who are willing to post photoshopped slanders, now do they?
Slander is oral, libel is written, so it would be libel, except it isn't libel because her quote is accurate.

Tired of the opposite sex? Want to turn your favorite football player into a raging homsexual? Then purchase your Gay-Gene Cattle Prod! One Zap from the GGCP will turn the Gay Gene off or on at your whim. So if you want your wife to get some hot girl on girl action, the Gay-Gene Cattle Prod is for you! *not intended for use on children*

This message is a reply to:
 Message 17 by deerbreh, posted 08-23-2005 10:23 AM deerbreh has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 24 by deerbreh, posted 08-23-2005 10:55 AM Tal has replied

  
Chiroptera
Inactive Member


Message 21 of 134 (235947)
08-23-2005 10:49 AM
Reply to: Message 19 by Tal
08-23-2005 10:45 AM


Re: I'm sorry, too
quote:
She can't use her son's death to promote her political activism and then expect to be shielded from rebutalls because she is a grieving mother.
Does this go for all grieving mothers who are politically active for some cause, or only those who are active against your causes?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 19 by Tal, posted 08-23-2005 10:45 AM Tal has not replied

  
deerbreh
Member (Idle past 2921 days)
Posts: 882
Joined: 06-22-2005


Message 22 of 134 (235948)
08-23-2005 10:50 AM
Reply to: Message 19 by Tal
08-23-2005 10:45 AM


Re: I'm sorry, too
You go to war with the Army you have, not the Army you want to have. And yes, they've upgraded 99% of the vehicles in operation over there with armor.
If you are going to quote Rumsfield you ought to at least acknowledge it.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 19 by Tal, posted 08-23-2005 10:45 AM Tal has not replied

  
berberry
Inactive Member


Message 23 of 134 (235952)
08-23-2005 10:55 AM
Reply to: Message 19 by Tal
08-23-2005 10:45 AM


Re: I'm sorry, too
Tal writes me:
quote:
No she isn't.
And how exactly would you know this? Anyone who doesn't agree with the administration's conduct of this war cannot grieve, is that it? What does a mother have to do to grieve legitimately? Wear a long black dress and a veil? Must she remain at home all day? Must she abandon her friends as well as her politics? Only by donning a facade of sycophancy to the wingnuts whose policies killed her son can she be considered a genuine grieving mother?
Does your god let you pass judgement on just anyone, or only on those who don't share your narrow-minded lunacy?

"I think younger workers first of all, younger workers have been promised benefits the government promises that have been promised, benefits that we can't keep. That's just the way it is." George W. Bush, May 4, 2005

This message is a reply to:
 Message 19 by Tal, posted 08-23-2005 10:45 AM Tal has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 25 by Chiroptera, posted 08-23-2005 11:01 AM berberry has replied

  
deerbreh
Member (Idle past 2921 days)
Posts: 882
Joined: 06-22-2005


Message 24 of 134 (235953)
08-23-2005 10:55 AM
Reply to: Message 20 by Tal
08-23-2005 10:48 AM


Re: I'm sorry, too
Slander is oral, libel is written, so it would be libel, except it isn't libel because her quote is accurate.
I was talking about the photoshopped picture. Cindy didn't post that, you did. Anyway, I see nothing wrong with the quote. It may be a bit of an overstatement, but it has some truth in it.
edit: And by the way, your caption is offensive and really doesn't belong on this discussion thread. Just because this is the Coffee House doesn't mean anything goes.
This message has been edited by deerbreh, 08-23-2005 11:00 AM

This message is a reply to:
 Message 20 by Tal, posted 08-23-2005 10:48 AM Tal has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 33 by Tal, posted 08-23-2005 12:28 PM deerbreh has replied

  
Chiroptera
Inactive Member


Message 25 of 134 (235957)
08-23-2005 11:01 AM
Reply to: Message 23 by berberry
08-23-2005 10:55 AM


Re: I'm sorry, too
Hi, berberry.
Maybe you should find a picture of a woman who has lost her son in Iraq but who has been politically active in supporting the war. You can photoshop her image too, maybe put her in a Nazi uniform and give her a Hitler mustache. You can then say that by supporting an unnecessary war in which her son was killed, she is pissing on her son's grave.
Yeah, I know it goes against your southern gentlemanly sense of chivalry, but Tal says that it's okay to do this sort of thing.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 23 by berberry, posted 08-23-2005 10:55 AM berberry has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 26 by berberry, posted 08-23-2005 11:17 AM Chiroptera has replied

  
berberry
Inactive Member


Message 26 of 134 (235963)
08-23-2005 11:17 AM
Reply to: Message 25 by Chiroptera
08-23-2005 11:01 AM


Re: I'm sorry, too
Chiroptera writes me:
quote:
Yeah, I know it goes against your southern gentlemanly sense of chivalry...
Thank you for the kind words, but I should hope that no one but Tal and other neocons would do such a thing as you suggest. It's okay to talk about it in the abstract - especially since we aren't the ones who brought such things up to begin with - but let's not try to out-Tal Tal in this situation. Let him wallow in the gutter by himself.

"I think younger workers first of all, younger workers have been promised benefits the government promises that have been promised, benefits that we can't keep. That's just the way it is." George W. Bush, May 4, 2005

This message is a reply to:
 Message 25 by Chiroptera, posted 08-23-2005 11:01 AM Chiroptera has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 27 by Chiroptera, posted 08-23-2005 11:23 AM berberry has not replied

  
Chiroptera
Inactive Member


Message 27 of 134 (235965)
08-23-2005 11:23 AM
Reply to: Message 26 by berberry
08-23-2005 11:17 AM


conservative solipsism
Hi, berberry.
Of course I wasn't serious. I made the suggestion to test Tal's reaction. I wonder whether he would be shocked by it; it wouldn't surprise me if he never considered the possibility that the other side could engage in the same tactics with the same legitimacy.
One thing that I have noticed is that conservatives seem unable to imagine themselves in the other person's position, or to imagine what other people may feel about what they say or do.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 26 by berberry, posted 08-23-2005 11:17 AM berberry has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 34 by Tal, posted 08-23-2005 12:33 PM Chiroptera has replied

  
Yaro
Member (Idle past 6525 days)
Posts: 1797
Joined: 07-12-2003


Message 28 of 134 (235966)
08-23-2005 11:24 AM
Reply to: Message 19 by Tal
08-23-2005 10:45 AM


Re: I'm sorry, too
So, can you adress her points? Or are you just going to ASSERT that she is wrong?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 19 by Tal, posted 08-23-2005 10:45 AM Tal has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 31 by Tal, posted 08-23-2005 12:22 PM Yaro has not replied

  
Monk
Member (Idle past 3953 days)
Posts: 782
From: Kansas, USA
Joined: 02-25-2005


Message 29 of 134 (235990)
08-23-2005 12:05 PM
Reply to: Message 18 by berberry
08-23-2005 10:25 AM


Sheehan's skin
But Cindy Sheehan is a grieving mother, and where I come from you don't ridicule a grieving mother. You wouldn't do it to Beth Holloway Twitty and you wouldn't do it to Cindy Sheehan. You don't understand one goddamned thing that woman is going through and you have absolutely no right to judge her.
Attack moveon.org all you want. Leave Cindy the hell alone.
I don’t see Beth Twitty’s diatribes appearing daily on MichaelMore.com. I don’t see her throwing the kind of unfounded bombshells that Sheehan is throwing under the shield of a grieving mom.
Here are just a few more of Sheehan’s comments:
We as mothers need to stop buying into the load of misogynistic crap that our children need our constant presence in their lives so they can thrive and grow. What we need as families are strong support systems that allow each family member to grow and achieve his/her full potential as human beings. What we as Moms need to stop doing is giving our children to the military industrial war complex to be used as human cluster bombs: to kill innocent civilians and to perhaps die enriching and feeding the gluttonous war machine. Source
My first born was murdered. Am I angry? Yes, he was killed for lies and for a PNAC Neo-Con agenda to benefit Israel. My son joined the Army to protect America, not Israel."
As soft-spoken and sincere-sounding as Paul Wolfowitz is, is there yet any sane adult in this country whose skin does not crawl when this murderous liar opens his mouth and speaks? Our country has been overtaken by murderous thugs....gangsters who lust after fortunes and power."
My son died for NOTHING, and George Bush and his evil cabal and their reckless policies killed him. My son was sent to fight in a war that had no basis in reality and was killed for it.' I have never said 'pretty please' or 'thank you.' I have never said anything wishy-washy like he uses 'Patriotic Rhetoric.' I say my son died for LIES. George Bush LIED to us and he knew he was LYING. Source
Now lets examine who is lying by looking at the two faces of Sheehan: The first account is her initial statements after meeting with Bush;
As noted, Cindy Sheehan already met with Bush last June, two months after Casey's death, along with a delegation of grieving military families. After that meeting, Sheehan initially said President Bush was caring, and the two spoke of their deep religious convictions. "I now know he's sincere about wanting freedom for the Iraqis," Cindy declared. "I know he's sorry and feels some pain for our loss. And I know he's a man of faith." She says she and her husband thought about broaching their discontent with the war but held back out of respect for what they thought their late son would have wanted. She instead enjoyed the commiseration of the also-bereaved. She concluded by saying, "That was the gift the president gave us, the gift of happiness, of being together." Source
Now there is a different account regarding the same meeting:
In one of Szymanski's two identical accounts, Cindy Sheehan claimed during their visit President Bush was "acting cocky and it was probably one of the worst experiences in my entire life." He bounced around the room in a jovial manner. Szymanski quotes Sheehan as saying her 25-year-old daughter, Carley, "told me that after he made [a] remark, he gave her one of the filthiest looks she had ever had gotten in her life." And, she says, Cindy was not alone; every other family felt this, as well. Cindy sums up: "Looking back, all I can say is that the meeting with Bush was one of the most disgusting experiences in my life." (She also referred to President Bush as the "Fhrer" and called the War on Terrorism "blatant genocide.") Source
If Sheehan were simply a grieving mother who let MoveOn.org speak for her then yes, there would be no justification for criticizing her. But she is a liar as shown through the two divergent accounts of her meeting with Bush. And these comments are just the tip of the iceberg for what is becoming a voluminous list of acerbic rhetoric by Sheehan.
I don’t much care for the untrue smear tactics against her, but she asked for it. When she puts out public statements like these, it is absolutely fair to counter her lies and exaggerations. She wants publicity, fine, then she must stand up to public scrutiny, especially when her statements are so far off the deep end. Although she is still greiving, it seems to me her top priority now is to seek her fortunes as a political activist. If she wants to continue with her new found career, she needs a thicker skin.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 18 by berberry, posted 08-23-2005 10:25 AM berberry has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 30 by Yaro, posted 08-23-2005 12:20 PM Monk has not replied
 Message 32 by berberry, posted 08-23-2005 12:26 PM Monk has replied

  
Yaro
Member (Idle past 6525 days)
Posts: 1797
Joined: 07-12-2003


Message 30 of 134 (236005)
08-23-2005 12:20 PM
Reply to: Message 29 by Monk
08-23-2005 12:05 PM


Re: Sheehan's skin
It seems to me people are missing the bigger point about this woman. I don't think shes supposed to be 100% correct. People hang on her words and quote mine her as if she's supposed to be some sort of politician or something. She dosn't write policy, she's mad, and is protesting.
Personaly I think she has every right to, and her broader points are valid. As to her lying, I think that is too harsh. On interviews I have heard with her she's pretty clear on the fact that she has had a change of heart, further, back when she talked to bush, it's kinda hard to walk out of the Oval office and give bad PR right there.
I dunno. I think people are being to hard on her, she's just an avarege person like me and you, and what she is doing is making her no money. Leave her alone, if you don't like what she's saying don't listen. But the fact that so many people are rising up and slinging mud at her is a testament to the fact that shes not the only one needing "thick skin".

This message is a reply to:
 Message 29 by Monk, posted 08-23-2005 12:05 PM Monk has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024