Dr. Scott owns a reproduction.
The only "scholars" who deny this Codex are Jesus Seminar types. Their selective scholarship is well known to only recognize sources that agree with their pseudepigrapha. Why won't they address 7Q5 ?
Or the Magdalen fragments ? Or Tatians harmony ?
I can't even find the title "Mayerianus" on the Net - nothing.
If this is part of your evidence to say it is fake by this basis (not existing on the Internet) then this is as mental midget yuppie as it gets.
Dr. Scott has verified it to be genuine which further exposes this conspiracy to deny the existence of First Century sources.
Anyone who is even mildly involved in the ancient mss market knows that Dr. Scott is the eminent scholar.
You assume any involvement of Simonides to automatically mean the mss to be a forgery. This is rhetoric, the misuse of logic.
This message has been edited by WILLOWTREE, 07-01-2004 05:45 PM