I see from this and you comment in post 209 that the answer is that you are, in fact, stupid and so forgiven. You are utterly ignorant of what is even meant by radioactive decay.
Unless there are direct complaints by other participants I'll let you carry on.
This message has been edited by AdminNosy, 07-29-2004 04:02 PM
I am guessing what you think is stupid is my leaving room for the possibility atomic decay rates could have changed.
No that is not it (though there is no reason to think they have (that is evidenced reasons) ). What is stupid is suggesting that Adam would decay radioactively. It is so stupid I had to leave open the possibility of you just trying to avoid actually debating.
No, the wording had absolutely nothing to do with the topic of discussion. It had no thought behind it at all. It is gibberish pretending to be something intelligent.
If you wish to continue to be able to debate I suggest you demonstrate that you can actually read.