quote:
That teeny little scientific rule that requires evidence is a problem for you?
You can't evidence God physically, so He must be exempt from the usual criteria, otherwise you simply piss in the wind, and get all wet. You may not see Him blowing, but you ignore Him at your own loss.
quote:
science requires evidence except for god which it must simply accept as being true. It's not consistent, equitable, or logical.
It is the essence of logic, and it is certain science will adapt.
quote:
There is no scientifically valid evidence that ANYONE or ANYTHING banged out miracles.
Only because johnny come lately so called science, whose underlying philosophy is to count everything out that is of the spirit, doesn't chose to believe eyewitnesses, who gave their life as proof it was true. It is a well known fact that He and they did bang out miracles. Unless you have a time machine, you can't detect this, and have only your disbelief. This does not change the facts, just because there was no real science much to speak of then, unless we count the 'wise men' who were said to purse true knowledge, and it led them smack dab to the Messiah!
quote:
Science is a process by which we inductively derive a hypothesis, & with the exception of anything arkathon wants to be true, we must have evidence for & deductively test that hypothesis
Since you are so lame at testing for spiritual things, they can not fall under your current scientific handicap requirement of only physical, touchable, etc. Otherwise the fair sounding 'we must be able to test it' becomes nothing in this world more than a filter to filter out God, and His creation. Once they are filtered out, you have insanity, when it comes to cosmology (big bang, speck) and orgins (granny bacteria, mother of all living, and her rodent like offspring who sprung out whales, and all mammals!) Sure you still might be able to come up with nikes, and a bunch of other things, but you may not get out of your little retard bubble in the big picture like that!
quote:
as a point of fact, the Dark Ages are long gone & were filled with the kind of christianity you long for.
No, they were in as much darkness as the evos in today's retard bubble! Probably more stinky, as they falsely laid claim on God.
quote:
he moment you make an exception for something scientifically, it becomes pseudo-science.
The moment you don't make an exception to trying to fit the Almighty in a little box of physical criteria, you become science falsely so called!
quote:
The reason god can't be included in science is because there's no evidence
True, not in the 'physical only' allowed in the retard bubble of course He won't go in there. He's a Spirit! And besides, even though His fingerprints are all over creation, and eyewitnesses coming out of the woodwork, you don't want to acknowledge the evidence in the physical that we do have!
quote:
This reduces your argument to being against a scientific methodology that requires evidence.
That requires physical evidence for a spiritual God, yes. He's a well known exception to your rules, and philosophy of science.
{Fixed 1 quote box - AM}
[Note: This message has been edited by Adminnemooseus]