Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
1 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,913 Year: 4,170/9,624 Month: 1,041/974 Week: 368/286 Day: 11/13 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Prophecy for Buzsaw
Buzsaw
Inactive Member


Message 317 of 385 (143818)
09-22-2004 2:01 AM


Lysimachus, My WWW Friend And Brother
Hi Marcos. Some here in town are really down on you, but just want you to know I'm your friend and brother. I appreciate the good, intelligent and thorough job you and your brother did on the Exodus thread. That is not to say that, imo, some of the criticism here has been that maybe you should've been a bit more tactful in some statements you've made here in this thread, but hey, we all are guilty of that on occasion, including our counterparts, aren't we?
Just a note to say I am reading and studying the on line Beast/Dragon/Woman book and haven't forgotten you. I'm not finished with it and will need some time in my busy schedule to read up on it prayerfully and carefully in order to evaluate it carefully and thoroughly before responding in depth. So far, I've learned a few things and I've found some serious errors in it which I will address when I am finished with it. There is much truth in it, laced with a substantial amount of error, imo, so far which I will get to when I get a handle on the whole of it. In the mean time as you are awaiting more of my response, I'll mention a thing or two for you to think about.
The prophet Daniel prophesied, I believe, in the 5th century BC, whereas the prophet John prophesied in the first century AD. The prophet Daniel was told some stuff/info would be sealed/withheld until a later time. The prophet John was given much, imo, of what Daniel didn't see. It's like Daniel saw the rough sketch of a painter's work and John sees it finished with all the detail. My point here is that too much in the book is assumed from Daniel's visions which the latter prophet, John, sees more clearly in detail. Thus, in order to determine what is to come for the latter days, one must not over-ride the more detailed picture with the obscure, as I believe the book has done. For example, The 10 horned beast of Revelation 17, 18, hates Mystery Bablylon, five times identified as a city and eventually destroys her with fire in one hour. Question: How then can the beast of Revelation 13 and 17, which are one and the same, be one and the same as the harlot woman, Mystery Babylon, which the beast hates, persecutes and eventually destroys in one hour?
I don't mean to make this an exclusive dialog with Marcos. If others wish to jump in here with comments, relative yada, (as some are prone to do) or whatever, please feel free, but remember, I said, relative yada.
Also, I am aware that though this thread is concerning my take on prophecy, I am aware that it is Mark's thread, so Mark, (or admin) if you'd rather we do a separate thread for this, just say so.
This message has been edited by buzsaw, 09-22-2004 01:05 AM

Buzsaw
Inactive Member


Message 319 of 385 (143825)
09-22-2004 2:35 AM
Reply to: Message 318 by crashfrog
09-22-2004 2:09 AM


CF, if you would really get serious about these prophecies, stop and really think through, that if you were alive when they were prophesied, how impossible some of them would seem to you for fulfillment, you might have a different appreciation for them. For example, suppose you lived in the first century AD and someone came up and prophesied to you, whose pocket contained copper, gold or silver coins for sustenance, that some day those copper, gold and silver coins would be replaced with marks and numbers and that without the marks and numbers you would have no sustenance. Think about that as that likelihood is becoming reality as we speak, while I go and get some sleep.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 318 by crashfrog, posted 09-22-2004 2:09 AM crashfrog has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 320 by crashfrog, posted 09-22-2004 2:51 AM Buzsaw has replied
 Message 323 by jar, posted 09-22-2004 10:57 AM Buzsaw has not replied

Buzsaw
Inactive Member


Message 324 of 385 (143988)
09-23-2004 12:24 AM
Reply to: Message 320 by crashfrog
09-22-2004 2:51 AM


LOL!
It's not a surprising prophecy, Buz. They were already doing this.
LOL. Who'd ever have thought of or dreamed up a worldwide system where all world citizens would be required to trade by marks or numbers on (specific) right hand or forehead -- no cash, period -- either the mark, number on specific body locations or starve without electronic wire/wireless tech?
This message has been edited by buzsaw, 09-22-2004 11:26 PM

This message is a reply to:
 Message 320 by crashfrog, posted 09-22-2004 2:51 AM crashfrog has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 327 by crashfrog, posted 09-23-2004 12:46 AM Buzsaw has replied

Buzsaw
Inactive Member


Message 325 of 385 (143989)
09-23-2004 12:33 AM
Reply to: Message 321 by Rei
09-22-2004 3:14 AM


Re: The Rest Of Rei's Link Chart, Not Posted
Rei, the point you're missing is that the Cat 4,5 hurricanes were of such intensity that by the time they hit landfall they did damage -- lots of it. The others of this catagory didn't even hit land. The list is accurate in the link so far as your chart goes. The fact remains that factoring in the most recent storms, damage is on the rise. You can't skirt around that.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 321 by Rei, posted 09-22-2004 3:14 AM Rei has not replied

Buzsaw
Inactive Member


Message 326 of 385 (143991)
09-23-2004 12:46 AM


I'll go back and do some refreshing Rei and get back to you as to whether the charts agree.

Buzsaw
Inactive Member


Message 329 of 385 (144074)
09-23-2004 11:16 AM
Reply to: Message 321 by Rei
09-22-2004 3:14 AM


Re: The Rest Of Rei's Link Chart, Not Posted
If neither of these are the definition that you want, then state the definition that you want. If you can't make a solid definition that works, then drop your claim.
It appears my link statement was pertaining those hitting US. I will concede to that. However the big picture we're missing here in this aside is that global catastrophies are on an alarming increase. Check out the following statements by insurance and other business notables concerning rise in catastrophic climate disasters. I'll post the entire quote from the first on the list which is fairly representative of the rest. Links to the rest are all concerned about climate change for the worse.
"Storms in recent years provided strong evidence of a more extreme climate. The fiercest hurricane recorded in the Caribbean/Atlantic sector was Hurricane Gilbert in 1988, with sustained winds of 175mph and gusts of over 200 mph. The likes of the windstorms of October 1987 and January 1990 in southern UK had not been seen for three centuries.
Losses have also escalated. Fifteen catastrophic storms and floods since 1989 cost insurers more than $80 billion worldwide. Hurricane Andrew set a new $25 billion record when it swept across Florida in 1992, the 1993 Mississippi floods cost $12 billion. According to Swiss Re, natural and man-made catastrophes led to insurance losses of $18.8 billion last year, 73 per cent up on 1993...
Dr Andre Dlugolecki, chief manager, UK operations at General Accident (GA), was one of the insurers at Berlin....'I can't discuss what went on at the seminar, but the best American scientists are now saying there are enough extreme events to create a 90-95 per cent probability that climate change is happening[.'] Dlugolecki says."
Corporate Cover July/August 1995 (in)
http://www.phoenixmags.com.au/cr/jan96/globalw.htm
Global Reinsurance Analysis 1997
404
We looked high and low. | Mount Holyoke College
Munich Re
http://www.munichre.com/...blications/press/eng_970311_f.htm
Natural catastrophe losses will continue to increase / Statements on trends dramatically confirmed.......number of natural catastrophes classified as "great" increased by a factor of 4.4.......
Munich Re
http://www.munichre.com/...blications/press/eng_960319_f.htm
Forbidden
the growing number and intensity of windstorms, thunderstorms, and floods all over the world are attributable to the rapid increase in air and sea temperatures,'' says Berz....
Page not found | :: Welcome to Enviro World ::
Unchecked pollution 'will cause economic collapse'......
The London Times
http://www.mistral.co.uk/hammerwood/citydont.htm
Swiss Re
| Swiss Re
"'Miami -- Eleven times in the past two years, forecaster William Gray has watched a record number of tropical systems churn into monster hurricanes over the warm waters of the Atlantic Ocean and Caribbean Sea.
'We'll see hurricane damage like never before," he said. .........
http://www.n-jcenter.com/cane/cane97/gray01.htm
Powerful companies change sides in battle over global warming
http://www.woza.co.za/forum/globalclimato.htm

This message is a reply to:
 Message 321 by Rei, posted 09-22-2004 3:14 AM Rei has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 333 by Rei, posted 09-23-2004 1:50 PM Buzsaw has not replied

Buzsaw
Inactive Member


Message 330 of 385 (144078)
09-23-2004 11:23 AM
Reply to: Message 327 by crashfrog
09-23-2004 12:46 AM


Say what?
[/qs]I'm sorry, I didn't see where it said "electronic wireless tech" in the Bible. Can you show me that passage?[/qs]
Prophecies seldom give details as to how they will be fulfilled, nor need they. That they predict unusual highly unlikely happenings for the time of prediction is what makes them supernatural. Possibility of global moneyless requirememt for commerce totally undreamed of until at least the industrial revolution.
Gotta be outa town rest of day. So long.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 327 by crashfrog, posted 09-23-2004 12:46 AM crashfrog has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 331 by crashfrog, posted 09-23-2004 11:54 AM Buzsaw has replied
 Message 332 by PaulK, posted 09-23-2004 11:54 AM Buzsaw has not replied

Buzsaw
Inactive Member


Message 336 of 385 (144311)
09-23-2004 11:22 PM
Reply to: Message 331 by crashfrog
09-23-2004 11:54 AM


Predicting then that the same techniques would be used more generally, and possibly universally, is not a great leap of the imagination.
Yah sure, CF. LOL. It's taken a couple of milleniums for it even to come into focus as a possibility on a global basis. Nobody back then had any idea man could harness electricity, telephony and wireless, etc. That also took nearly a couple of milleniums to think up. It's nuts to think precious metal would ever be replaced as medium of exchange. After all, all they were doing is making up a note to the effect that someone owed someone else some precious metal coins. That's a far cry from global computerized marks and numbers.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 331 by crashfrog, posted 09-23-2004 11:54 AM crashfrog has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 337 by crashfrog, posted 09-24-2004 12:05 AM Buzsaw has replied

Buzsaw
Inactive Member


Message 375 of 385 (144783)
09-25-2004 11:52 PM
Reply to: Message 337 by crashfrog
09-24-2004 12:05 AM


Which is irrelevant, because those things aren't predicted in the Bible. You seem to have a staggering inability to separate the concept from the implementation.
LOL. Some medium for implementation was implied in the prophecy. The likelyhood of it ever happening until recent tech was in place, was so remote that nobody, even students of prophecy took it literally.
In a culture with other mediums of exchange besides metal? Why on Earth would that be the case?
Oh yeah, like some used shells and so forth, but by and large, the more civilized cultures have gone with coins with gold and silver being the stabilizing metal for keeping the economy stable.
But the metal coins were merely stand-ins for livestock, oils, preserved meats and grains, and other barterable items. The only reason they were "precious" in the first place was because they were easily minted into trade tokens.
No.
1. They were more than that. They were precious commodity which could be melted into beautiful desirabe jewelry, statues, medals or whatever.
2. They were a relatively scarce commodity, scace enough for the need to search, laboriously mine and prepare for exchange medium. The relative scarcity of them afforded the stability of the economy of a culture, so as not to inflate that economy as would things like shells, copper, and yes, paper.
3. They were a desirable commodity relatively easy to securely hide, carry on the person and transfer for things of larger size, value and quantity.
4. They were durable and corrosion resistant.
So what you're telling me is, in a society that had developed an abstract trading economy, banking, money changing, and bookkeeping, it would have been impossible to imagine a system where finances were abstracted, banked, changed, and kept in books?
Impossible, yes, on a global basis. Note in the prophecy of Revelation 13 that none from all nations would be able to buy or sell without a number or mark in the forhead or right hand. BTW, THAT 666 HAPPENS TO BE THE NUMBER OF THE BEAST DOES NOT NECESSARILY MEAN THAT 666 IS THE NUMBER ASCRIBED TO THE CITIZENRY AS SO MANY ARE BELIEVING. THE TEXT DOES NOT SAY THAT. The number 666 has to do with identification of the beast.
I have an hypothesis in mind as to how this identity may be discerned. It would require some time to explain this which I may do if I find time.
How dumb do you think people were back then, Buz? You honestly believe that nobody could have seen the writing on the wall? That bookkeeping was an easier way to deal with large sums of money than coinage?
Frankly, Froggy, me forum friend, it's far dumber to argue in futility that it could be implemented globally without sophisticated electronic technology for implementing it.
How dumb do you think I am, to believe that nobody could imagine something that had been in front of them for 400 years?
Mmmm, do you really want me to answer that'n, given possibility for fulfillment never happened for milleniums?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 337 by crashfrog, posted 09-24-2004 12:05 AM crashfrog has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 376 by crashfrog, posted 09-26-2004 12:42 AM Buzsaw has replied
 Message 380 by Amlodhi, posted 09-29-2004 2:57 PM Buzsaw has not replied

Buzsaw
Inactive Member


Message 377 of 385 (144970)
09-27-2004 1:29 AM
Reply to: Message 376 by crashfrog
09-26-2004 12:42 AM


Yeah, tattoos on the hand or forehead of a specific number.
That's not how it's going to be implemented, so the prophecy fails on that count alone.
Say what? Nothing is said about tattoos on the hand or forehead in the prophecy.?? So how so does it fail on that account?
I wasn't talking about shells and beads, Buz. I was talking about things like merchant exchange notes, which were in use at the time. Numerical abstractions of currency exchange, like our own paper money.
Ok, let's see a link or something as to what exactly you're talking about. It sounds to me like nothing more than a promisary note which people have used for a long time. The note was, I would assume, used along with coins, which would not be the case in the prophecy situation.
See, this is why you do so poorly in these prophecy threads. Instead of doing some basic research about the time period, you assume that everybody who lived before you was a stupendous idiot and therefore, any prediction that seems the least accurate must have been "supernatural."
Poorly, Froggy? Like when?
Instead of embarassing yourself with your arrogant, patrician dismissal of the intelligence of your ancestors, why don't you do a little research? You might learn something.
OK Smartoff, let's see the evidence of your research and exactly how this moneyless system worked. Were there no coins atol in the economy?
What do you mean, "no"? You're going to tell me that, in fact, you can eat gold? That you can make houses out of it? Never mind, of course, that the vast, vast majority of coinage familiar to the average person would not have been gold, but rather, other, less valuable metals like copper.
Precious metals, like all money, are simply stand-ins for universal needs. That's the function of currency, Buz. It's an agreed-upon unit of barter exchange. Before metals, exchanges were measured in, say, oxes or sheep, even if these weren't the items being exchanged.
No, of course you can't eat precious metals, but for a long time, they've been able to buy eats and make houses for the holders of such. Same with oxen and sheep.
Oh, certainly, with the limits of communication avaliable at the time.
Ahah!! You are getting around now, to agree that modern tech HAD TO COME INTO PLAY FIRST Now isn't that what I've been contending all along? And the people of the time of the prophecy had no remote idea of the tech that has come into play for this prophecy to become a reality. Nice to see we're coming together on this crucial crux.
But impossible to imagine? How dumb do you think they were?
Not dumb atol, but you'n me know that it took milleniums for mankind to come up with something for realistic fulfillment don't we?
But yet, that doesn't mean the Bible predicts electronics. Only that someone was able to extrapolate a trend that had been 400 years in the making. That's not supernatural, that's sense.
Please stay with my point, that the Bible presented a prophecy that would require electronics for fulfillment.
This message has been edited by buzsaw, 09-27-2004 12:32 AM

The immeasurable present is forever consuming the eternal future and extending the infinite past. buz

This message is a reply to:
 Message 376 by crashfrog, posted 09-26-2004 12:42 AM crashfrog has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 378 by crashfrog, posted 09-27-2004 10:57 AM Buzsaw has not replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024