Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
1 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,913 Year: 4,170/9,624 Month: 1,041/974 Week: 368/286 Day: 11/13 Hour: 0/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Where did the Egyptians come from ?
gene90
Member (Idle past 3853 days)
Posts: 1610
Joined: 12-25-2000


Message 50 of 112 (14864)
08-05-2002 2:06 PM
Reply to: Message 48 by Quetzal
08-05-2002 12:24 PM


[QUOTE][B]Moreover, where is the evidence of a genetic bottleneck of staggering proportions in even one non-human species alive today?[/QUOTE]
[/B]
California condors, Florida panthers and Bengal tigers don't count.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 48 by Quetzal, posted 08-05-2002 12:24 PM Quetzal has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 51 by blitz77, posted 08-06-2002 8:37 AM gene90 has replied

  
gene90
Member (Idle past 3853 days)
Posts: 1610
Joined: 12-25-2000


Message 52 of 112 (14896)
08-06-2002 9:24 AM
Reply to: Message 51 by blitz77
08-06-2002 8:37 AM


[QUOTE][B]How about the interesting feature in the hominid fossil record for the abrupt disappearance of homo sapiens between 80 000 and 40 000 years ago[/QUOTE]
[/B]
Disappearance?
[QUOTE][B]The other model (I'm not saying that it's correct) explains the lack of larger animals by saying they were wiped out completely then (except for those on the ark) and all the fossil evidence for them before the flood.[/QUOTE]
[/B]
YECs should agree on a common scenario. This version of the Flood destroys all fossils that existed prior to it?
[QUOTE][B]Mitochondrial studies of women from around the world [/QUOTE]
[/B]
Actually you can do mtDNA studies on men as well, everyone has mitochondrial DNA. However, it is always transmitted exclusively down by the mother.
[QUOTE][B]Using two different models this date is either 270,000 or 27,000 years ago[/QUOTE]
[/B]
Then more studies are needed until a date is more strongly supported by the evidence. That is, after all, how science works. Are we supposed to be troubled by the fact that there are two camps?
And by the way, either date rules out a young Earth. Why are you a YEC when you are aware of so much evidence against your beliefs?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 51 by blitz77, posted 08-06-2002 8:37 AM blitz77 has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 53 by John, posted 08-06-2002 11:10 AM gene90 has not replied
 Message 56 by blitz77, posted 08-07-2002 6:04 AM gene90 has not replied

  
gene90
Member (Idle past 3853 days)
Posts: 1610
Joined: 12-25-2000


Message 66 of 112 (15030)
08-08-2002 10:56 AM
Reply to: Message 58 by blitz77
08-07-2002 7:18 AM


[QUOTE][B]Since those dates are the maximum, it could easily be 5000 yrs.[/QUOTE]
[/B]
"Easily"? Only if we disregard everything inconvenient to the idea, right? : )

This message is a reply to:
 Message 58 by blitz77, posted 08-07-2002 7:18 AM blitz77 has not replied

  
gene90
Member (Idle past 3853 days)
Posts: 1610
Joined: 12-25-2000


Message 67 of 112 (15031)
08-08-2002 10:59 AM
Reply to: Message 63 by blitz77
08-08-2002 4:16 AM


[QUOTE][B]No, its just that that's the only version I could find on the internet to look at.[/QUOTE]
[/B]
Check BibleGateway.com: A searchable online Bible in over 150 versions and 50 languages.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 63 by blitz77, posted 08-08-2002 4:16 AM blitz77 has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024