Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 59 (9164 total)
2 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,920 Year: 4,177/9,624 Month: 1,048/974 Week: 7/368 Day: 7/11 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Harm in Homosexuality?
contracycle
Inactive Member


Message 145 of 309 (160418)
11-17-2004 9:14 AM
Reply to: Message 144 by Silent H
11-17-2004 8:59 AM


quote:
And it is pretty clear is it not that many of the people that rushed to the polls in fear of gay marriage did so because of the scare gay activists helped create via acts of civil disobediance?
Yeah - and anti-slavery activists caused a polarisation of opinion, and so did equal rights activists, and feminists et al.
This is a reactionary claim, and a common form of discrimination; frex "I'm not racist but other people are, so if we let the black family buy a house in the neighbourhood property values will go down". Thus the speaker acts on the racists behalf.
It's just a crude attempt to make the discrimination covert.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 144 by Silent H, posted 11-17-2004 8:59 AM Silent H has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 148 by Silent H, posted 11-17-2004 9:56 AM contracycle has replied

contracycle
Inactive Member


Message 149 of 309 (160508)
11-17-2004 11:42 AM
Reply to: Message 148 by Silent H
11-17-2004 9:56 AM


quote:
Uhhhh, are you saying the actions ended up being helpful, rather than if they had reached out to moderate groups to try and solidify ties with them?
Yes absolutely. Because after all, "moderate" is just code for "people who agree with me".
It is repeatedly the case that "extremism" - that is, actual and serious political activism rather than uselss jaw-jaw - creates the space ibnto which "moderates" move. Extremism is always the engine of social change.
quote:
Contra, personally I am for gay marriage as I don't care who gets married. I even support gay initiatives for it. I am just pointing out that there are alternate routes and it appears that they would be more productive.
Which is what the reactionary status quo always says. Slaves shouldn't rebel against cruel masters - they should know their place and campaign peacefully. Women shouldnl;t protest innthe streets - they should know their place and work behind the scenes. Gays shouldn't take to the streets with Pride - they should stay carefully our of sight and out of mind so as not to provoke anyone.
All of these are basically restatements of "whatever you do, don't rock the boat". But that is a recipe for defeat - the only way to change the status quo is precisely to rock the boat.
quote:
If I were desperate to get my rights, as opposed to having them plus a specific name, I'd be finding the support among those willing to give me my rights and not do things that might get them upset. Looking radical does not fly very far.
Those who sympathise with you already do not need to be persuaded. Those who do not sympathise with you already need to be persuaded, but you cannot do that if you are afraid confrontation. TYhose who directly oppose you are not going to be persuaded and most be resisted.
NON-radicalism is a recipe for failure. Sorry to be the messenger.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 148 by Silent H, posted 11-17-2004 9:56 AM Silent H has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 150 by Silent H, posted 11-17-2004 12:17 PM contracycle has replied

contracycle
Inactive Member


Message 189 of 309 (160907)
11-18-2004 5:29 AM
Reply to: Message 150 by Silent H
11-17-2004 12:17 PM


quote:
Hey I thought they were cool demonstrations, I tend to like civil disobedience. But even at the time I also said I wasn't sure if they were going to be productive, and it turns out that they weren't.
Thats what a lot of "liberals" said about anti-apartheid demsontrations. But they were wrong then and you are now. The purpose of a demonstration is to DEMONSTRATE your position to others, not to tug your forelock and beg their consent.
quote:
elling and spitting into peoples faces is pretty extreme, does that mean you would recommend that activity to someone who wants to get people on their side?
Yes - as long as you yell and spit at their enemies. In doing so you demonstrate solidarity and corporate responsibility. Don't you sympathise with people who are willing to fight alongside you?
quote:
In that environment, maybe it wasn't such a good time to say "no way am I going to accept anything less than full use of the word marriage", break the law, and throw it in the faces of everyone. Like I said, cool, but smart? Productive?
Much better than the alternative, which is to be ghettoised, and worse, to endorse that gghettoisation actively or passively. The fact that the bigots came out fighting should not be allowed to intimidate anyone into backing off; it is craven to say "I have principles, unless and until they are opposed".
quote:
It gave the conservatives the ammo they needed to create a rainbow scare, and make it seem like gays were about to turn the nation upside down.
"I'm not homophobic, but many other people are." Homophobia by proxy, just like racism by proxy.
Holmes, why don't you self-identify as a conservative? Every one of your arguments appears to be conservative, containing a reflexive hostility to anyone who wants to change anything or who takes steops top actually do so. It seems to me that your vision of the good society is everyone knowing their place.
quote:
Radicalism is also a recipe for failure. It all depends on how careful the cook is.
Achievements by radicals: the french and american revolutions, the rise of democracy, protestantism, the fall of slavery, female emancipation, the magna carta, the enlightenment, many others.
Triumphs of moderates: erm, got any? Kyoto springs to mind - it is the archetypal failure of the moderate strategy.
"Cautious, careful people, always casting about to preserve their reputation and social standing, can never bring about a reform." Susan B Anthony
"As long as the world shall last there will be wrongs, and if no man objected and no man rebelled, those wrongs would last forever." Clarence Darrow
"Disobedience, in the eyes of anyone who has read history, is man's original virtue. It is through disobedience and rebellion that progress has been made." Oscar Wilde
"The unreasonable man is the one who expects the world to adapt to his needs, the reasonable man is the one who adapts himself to suit the world. Therefore, all progress depends upon the unreasonable man."
George Bernard Shaw

This message is a reply to:
 Message 150 by Silent H, posted 11-17-2004 12:17 PM Silent H has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 196 by Silent H, posted 11-18-2004 7:45 AM contracycle has replied

contracycle
Inactive Member


Message 216 of 309 (161394)
11-19-2004 4:49 AM
Reply to: Message 196 by Silent H
11-18-2004 7:45 AM


quote:
You can demonstrate in a way that is unproductive or counterproductive.
All demonstrations without exception are productive as they forge the bonds of solidarioty within the group, raise consciousnees of the struggle and are the baby-steps of organisational expertise.
quote:
No spitting at people doesn't always look classy, and can turn potential allies into enemies
good - I have no interest in looking "classy" or any other form of elitism. And any potential ally turned off by such trivia was not worth having in the first place.
quote:
It isn't possible to criticize the gay marriage activism in its choice of actions, or you are against them?
Help help I'm being repressed!
Twisting the argument to delusions of persecution doesn't help your case. I didn't say that bo criticism is possible - I said that criticism of "radicalism" is inherently reactionary.
quote:
Are you accusing me of homophobia?
No, of being a reactionary. I don't think you are an active homophoibe any mopre than I think you are an active racist, but I do think you propagate racist and homophobic ideas and defend them.
quote:
I'm an independent, because I have some very liberal positions and some very conservative positions. In a way I tend to have a lot of conservative principles.
No shit
quote:
The invasion of Iraq. The alienation of "Old Europe" for "New Europe". Establishment of Israel and continued support of Israeli aggressions. Undercutting civil rights by inducing fear. The crushing of pagans and science.
Wow, you certainly have me convinced.
Idiot. They can achieve these things becuase the "moderates" are too chicken to resist. Thats exactly why a transistion to Fascism in the US is so plausible - the centre will go wherever the radicals drag it, and if the Left refuses to fight, as is the case in America, then it has necessarily already lost.
quote:
Socialized healthcare? Welfare? Scientific methodology and exploration?
Socialised healthcare is extremely radical; its one of the great advances of wocial democracy in the last century. There has nrver been a universal medical provision in history prior to this developement, and it relies on political principles that are still consdiered so radicalo as to be unspeakable (that is, communism).
Likewise welfare - in its day an "extreme" position that would bring about the fall of western civilisation by undermniing the profit motive that creates all.
Scientific exploration was inherently radical, refusing to accept the orthodox explanations in favour of independant thought and examniation of the material.
quote:
Oh, I thought that was George Walker Bush.
Well, you have only yourselves to blame.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 196 by Silent H, posted 11-18-2004 7:45 AM Silent H has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 222 by Silent H, posted 11-19-2004 5:55 AM contracycle has not replied

contracycle
Inactive Member


Message 265 of 309 (162522)
11-23-2004 4:32 AM
Reply to: Message 259 by Zachariah
11-23-2004 2:15 AM


quote:
What about the kids rights? Do they get any? Or do you and the gay rights movement get to choose for them? "In Brookline, Mass. a transexxual was invited to a FIRST GRADE CLASS to give details of his sex change operation."
Why do you have a problem with this? Ho is providing understanding and knowledge tantamount to the denial of rights?
quote:
"In Ashland Mass, children were assigned to play gays in school skits and were to say "it's natural to be attracted to the same sex" and girls held hands to portray a lesbian couple without prenotifying the parents."
And what is the problem with this? Is it wrong to tell kids the truth? Why on earth would or should the parents need to be notified, before or after?
quote:
Yeah, froggy that doesn't sound like assertion of rights it sounds like forcing them to watch and read what the gays choose.
It sounds like responsible education teaching people about reality instead of some strange delusional version of what YOU and your fellow fanatics want the world to be.
quote:
I can't believe we are fighting for people like you. -Z
SO GO THE FUCK HOME. Youre fighting for oil, anyway, not any group or policy.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 259 by Zachariah, posted 11-23-2004 2:15 AM Zachariah has not replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024