Mike's ego trip

If you have had a look at the POTM thread today you might have noticed that 'Mike the Wiz' has nominated one of his own posts. He claims that this is because no-one on the evolution side will nominate a post from the opposite point of view so he has to do it himself when he 'objectively' evaluates the quality of his own posts.Putting aside the question of why none of the other creationists on the site, few though they are, would have been able to nominate his posts, if it was really so good, why does Mike think that this post was so good?The post in question was number 60 in the 'Animal intelligence and Evolution/Creation' thread.TTFN,WK _{Edited by AdminJar to get link to point to the message itself instead of the thread.}This message has been edited by AdminJar, 02-24-2005 10:39 AM

Are you related to Stanley Unwin by any chance?TTFN,WK

People don't normally vote for themselves. I'd imagine that calling someone an 'ass hat' was bordering on rude. You're just taking the mick now, aren't you?TTFN,WK

Dear Mike,Perhaps you should refuse to debate en masse in the normal forums, perhaps it would be better to enter into 1-on-1s in the 'Great Debate' forum. This should remove the problem of being bombarded with evo questions and allow for a more focussed debate, you could also rely on more strictly defined boundaries of moderation.TTFN,WK

What does this mean?TTFN,WK

But even in terms of living things what does it mean? It sounds like one of those daft anthropomorphic ideas such as humans are 'more evolved' than any other lifeform.TTFN,WK