molecular genetic proof against random mutation (1)

borger, an article on hotspots you might like to read:http://kimura.tau.ac.il/~ron/Chap4/Chap4.html

has anyone posted this article yet?Large Number of Replacement Polymorphisms in Rapidly Evolving Genes of Drosophila: Implications for Genome-Wide Surveys of DNA Polymorphism | Genetics | Oxford Academici've only skim read it, it mentions something about why higher mutation rate isn't a plausible explanation for the rapidly evolving genes.

borger is looking mighty desperate,it's obvious to most I think, that borger's major objection to evolution isn't at all to do with the science of evolution. Its much more about his religious convictions

borger, you're an arrogant fool

I don't think i'd ever apologise, even if your crackpot multipurpose genome idea turned out to be true - you're still an arrogant fool