quote:
Originally posted by Fred Williams:
Informed evolutionists fight against environmentally directed mutations tooth and nail (case in point, resident PhD evo biologist Scott Page), because it does falsify Neo-Darwinism, as Peter stated.
Wow! Fred has endorsed Scott as an "informed evolutionist"! Scott, you have arrived! The next time Fred says "informed evolutionist say...", you can contradict him, since you are now part of the club.
quote:
Originally posted by Fred Williams:
If it got there by non-random mutation, this explicitly means the information was already present in the genome and no upward evolution occurred.
More info-babble. I have often wondered whether the following is an increase in information under the Creationist definition. I write a book, using only words that exist in Webster's dictionary. Is this new information? Of course not, as all the words were already present in the dictionary. It is just a rearrangement of existing information (much like Fred's "changes in an algorithm do not a new algorithm make").
FK
™ Version 4.2