|
Register | Sign In |
|
QuickSearch
Thread ▼ Details |
|
|
Author | Topic: Is ID Scientific? (was "Abusive Assumptions") | |||||||||||||||||||||||
CK Member (Idle past 4158 days) Posts: 3221 Joined: |
It is frustrating to try to post on this forum and yet have my side victimized by such negative stereotypes, and many times my posts have to spend a disproportionately large amount of time refuting these stereotypes or exposing simple logical fallacies within these stereotypes.
Why don't you post some actual evidence for ID and then we can actually discuss it. I've asked you a couple of time but it seems you'd just perfer to whine that actually present your case. So how about it? Pop in to one of the MULTIPLE current threads and let's see what the current state of play is with ID research.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
CK Member (Idle past 4158 days) Posts: 3221 Joined: |
And it occurs to me -
quote: Since the FRONTPAGE of Talk origins says: The Talk.Origins Archive is a collection of articles and essays, most of which have appeared in talk.origins at one time or another. The primary reason for this archive's existence is to provide mainstream scientific responses to the many frequently asked questions (FAQs) that appear in the talk.origins newsgroup and the frequently rebutted assertions of those advocating intelligent design or other creationist pseudosciences. Talk origins has NEVER offered equal time to creationism - the position has always been that is rubbish. So that's a strawman.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
CK Member (Idle past 4158 days) Posts: 3221 Joined: |
"peer-reviewed book" - that's a new one on me? anyone?
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
CK Member (Idle past 4158 days) Posts: 3221 Joined: |
but you have provided any evidence at all. You've provided some claims from some people who claim that they have some evidence .
I'm starting to think that you don't actually understand what evidence actually is.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
CK Member (Idle past 4158 days) Posts: 3221 Joined: |
quote: Because you are fulfilling it? as the "we've got the evidence but I just don't want to present it and OH LOOK SOME KITTENS!" creationist. why don't you stop your dodging and get over to one of the science forums and present it? This message has been edited by Charles Knight, 24-Mar-2005 05:59 PM
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
CK Member (Idle past 4158 days) Posts: 3221 Joined: |
Are you Ever going to head towards the science forums and present any of this evidence? Or do you just plan to whine all night?
Are you like to present any evidence in the science forums within 200 posts or so?
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
CK Member (Idle past 4158 days) Posts: 3221 Joined: |
I perfer to use the term "drive-by bullshit artist".
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
CK Member (Idle past 4158 days) Posts: 3221 Joined: |
Is there a decent ID forum? I'm still waiting for someone to post to your thread and tell us what the current state of the field is.
Anyone? good ID forum?
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
CK Member (Idle past 4158 days) Posts: 3221 Joined: |
quote: actually you've misused "pedagogical" as it would apply in this context. It is related to the art, strategies, techniques, and approaches of teaching rather than the actual teaching (althought some web sites don't seem to grasp this). In any case, it's would more specifically be referred to as andragogical. A polite thank you would be appreciated (because if you want to take that tone, you are sure to get plenty back). This message has been edited by Charles Knight, 04-Aug-2005 10:05 AM This message has been edited by Charles Knight, 04-Aug-2005 10:08 AM
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
CK Member (Idle past 4158 days) Posts: 3221 Joined: |
boot camp is still active?
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
CK Member (Idle past 4158 days) Posts: 3221 Joined: |
I wish to join my Brother WK in trying to view the future...
quote: Something about a donkey's maybe? This message has been edited by Charles Knight, 04-Aug-2005 04:54 PM
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
CK Member (Idle past 4158 days) Posts: 3221 Joined: |
Exons Entrons and Talking Genes
Maybe he means - "Exons, Introns, and Talking Genes: The Science Behind the Human Genome Project". INtrons not entrons. I notice you got it wrong previously quote: No need to thank me for correcting you - "well let's say back to the spelling books. This message has been edited by Charles Knight, 04-Aug-2005 06:36 PM
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
CK Member (Idle past 4158 days) Posts: 3221 Joined: |
Actually the 8080 was from @1974, the 8086 is what you might be thinking of.
No need to thank me for the correction. I think the problem is that you are using lots and lots of long words but nobody is convinced that you are actual know what you are on about. Maybe if you demonstrate that you know something about the basics?
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
CK Member (Idle past 4158 days) Posts: 3221 Joined: |
Is it ok for me to look shocked and amazed? THE Robert T.Bakker?
Oh and my niece wants to say (as she's here with me today): I really liked your Dinosaurs book, when I am older I will be a dinosaur person This message has been edited by Charles Knight, 09-Aug-2005 09:45 AM
|
|
|
Do Nothing Button
Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved
Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024