|
Register | Sign In |
|
QuickSearch
EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total) |
| |
ChatGPT | |
Total: 916,908 Year: 4,165/9,624 Month: 1,036/974 Week: 363/286 Day: 6/13 Hour: 1/2 |
Thread ▼ Details |
Member (Idle past 1970 days) Posts: 6165 From: Co. Wicklow, Ireland. Joined: |
|
Thread Info
|
|
|
Author | Topic: All Evolutionary scientists have been Evolutionary Indoctrinated | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
CK Member (Idle past 4157 days) Posts: 3221 Joined: |
Do you mean REAL professor or american "anyone who works in the place has a title of professor" professor*?
Can give us the name of this prof or the name of the papers he has submitted making those claims? * no slight intended - but to the british ear, the use of professor by americans can cover a range of people. Best to identify who we mean and narrow his qualifications and expertise at this stage. This message has been edited by Charles Knight, 30-Jul-2005 07:31 AM
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
CK Member (Idle past 4157 days) Posts: 3221 Joined: |
quote: No that's entirely back to front. You need to demonstrate that the effect exists first. You seem to misunderstand how this works, you make the claim, you provide the evidence. So in your next post try the following: My first piece of evidence is
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
CK Member (Idle past 4157 days) Posts: 3221 Joined: |
quote: But that simply not true - Evolution says nothing at all about the hand of God - that's just your take on it. It also totally overlooks the historical impact of creationists on the sciences. in additon "The world was created" - again nothing at all to do with evolution. This message has been edited by Charles Knight, 30-Jul-2005 12:31 PM
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
CK Member (Idle past 4157 days) Posts: 3221 Joined: |
When you turned up I thought from the op that at last we had another creationist who might give us something worth debating.. Sadly it seems you are just like the rest, constantly evading the issue and unable to support what is said.
To make things even worse you (with the post I am addressing) then perform the classic creationist trick of both arguing the scientist not the science AND quoting-mining. I was so hopeful....
quote: Creationist Lies
quote: Evolution is the result of random mutation AND natural selection. An argument that evolution couldn't not happen just by chance is a waste of bandwidth because evolutionists DO NOT claim that evolution happened just by chance.
quote: Ringo - like the rest of us is taking in the fact that you will repeat any old crap you find on the net without the faintest clue what you are on about.
quote: Where did Darwin say this and in what context ? (let me give you a clue the letter is from 1857). This is not promising is it? You are 3/3 in regards to all the classic creationist tricks. 1 = Making a premise and then asking others to disprove it rather than provide any positive support for it. 2 = Arguing the scientist rather than the science 3 = Quoting mining - both in giving distorting quotes and some that never actually existed. This message has been edited by Charles Knight, 30-Jul-2005 03:09 PM
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
CK Member (Idle past 4157 days) Posts: 3221 Joined: |
With 3 publications - the most recent of which is 12 years ago - he appears to be a lecturer (and I'm sure he does a great job of it) rather than what we would term a professor (A professor generally has a string of publications in A-rated journals and is seen as having made a significant contribution in his field).
I don't see which of those 3 papers addresses the issue you have raised - can you identify it for us?
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
CK Member (Idle past 4157 days) Posts: 3221 Joined: |
How many have a qualification in an area that would make then qualified to comment on TOE and how many are called Steve?
I am reading for a PhD in information sciences - does this make me an expert in other areas? of course it does not. Could you tell me why a dentist is an expert about the TOE? Duane Gish? - A man who purchased his Phd (there is a great site about his "thesis" from someone who saw it)
(I don't know some of those areas guys - can we identify which we feel would be experts in this area?) quote: This message has been edited by Charles Knight, 30-Jul-2005 03:03 PM This message has been edited by Charles Knight, 30-Jul-2005 03:04 PM This message has been edited by Charles Knight, 30-Jul-2005 03:08 PM
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
CK Member (Idle past 4157 days) Posts: 3221 Joined: |
That's a nice dodge - not one of the better ones I've seen you do but quite good.
With this statement, you say:
quote: Is a dentist a scientist? Will I be a scientist when I get my PhD? BTW - Have you found the papers by your professor yet? This message has been edited by Charles Knight, 30-Jul-2005 03:18 PM
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
CK Member (Idle past 4157 days) Posts: 3221 Joined: |
Escape to the future:
quote: So have you got the papers from your professor yet? Do you have anything to offer us besides onanism? This message has been edited by Charles Knight, 30-Jul-2005 03:27 PM This message has been edited by Charles Knight, 30-Jul-2005 03:28 PM
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
CK Member (Idle past 4157 days) Posts: 3221 Joined: |
Have you got the papers yet?
quote: Support or retract
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
CK Member (Idle past 4157 days) Posts: 3221 Joined: |
Have you got the papers yet?
quote: Support or retract
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
CK Member (Idle past 4157 days) Posts: 3221 Joined: |
No the actual quote is a mix of things said by two different people
that's called LYING not "exagerrated" - I know you creationists find the concept different to grasp.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
CK Member (Idle past 4157 days) Posts: 3221 Joined: |
quote: No you went further than than - you said:
quote: Why lie - when it's plain to see for all? I have quite reasonable asked to see the evidence, your reply is the following drivel:
quote: Moderators: I would ask that Randman be asked to support or Retract his position on this matter. This message has been edited by Charles Knight, 30-Jul-2005 04:00 PM
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
CK Member (Idle past 4157 days) Posts: 3221 Joined: |
quote: I will pay 100 to the charity of choice to anyone who can identity the evidence in the above post. Note: something some claims they saw 20 years is not considered "evidence" - well unless you are a creationist. Why are you wasting our time with this pathetic display? You make yourself like an complete tool. This message has been edited by Charles Knight, 30-Jul-2005 04:09 PM This message has been edited by Charles Knight, 30-Jul-2005 04:21 PM
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
CK Member (Idle past 4157 days) Posts: 3221 Joined: |
Ah I've seen this tactic before - you are trying to push me out of the marketplace.
quote: Well let's do this properly - we know my name is Charles Knight. What is yours? (I think I know what is going on here - Randman WANTS to be banned to claim a moral victory). Could you quote my lies? This message has been edited by Charles Knight, 30-Jul-2005 04:43 PM
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
CK Member (Idle past 4157 days) Posts: 3221 Joined: |
For what? The 100 was for the evidence in the post I quoted as it quite clearly states.
Now you present a link for an INVITATION for him to come and present evidence. It appears you are a bit slow in the head: I want to see THE evidence. Do you have a copy of his slides? His presentation notes?
|
|
|
Do Nothing Button
Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved
Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024