Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,903 Year: 4,160/9,624 Month: 1,031/974 Week: 358/286 Day: 1/13 Hour: 1/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Wikipedia - A general discussion of its validity
nwr
Member
Posts: 6412
From: Geneva, Illinois
Joined: 08-08-2005
Member Rating: 4.5


Message 9 of 40 (271537)
12-21-2005 6:03 PM


A wiki alternative
This just in:
Peer-reviewed alternative to Wikipedia set for launch.

Impeach Bush.

Replies to this message:
 Message 10 by pink sasquatch, posted 12-21-2005 6:13 PM nwr has not replied
 Message 11 by Silent H, posted 12-21-2005 6:27 PM nwr has not replied

  
nwr
Member
Posts: 6412
From: Geneva, Illinois
Joined: 08-08-2005
Member Rating: 4.5


Message 24 of 40 (272806)
12-26-2005 10:50 AM
Reply to: Message 22 by Nighttrain
12-26-2005 4:08 AM


Re: Wiki--a house of sand?
I agree that Wiki is a potential target of pressure groups. Thus entries on hot button items are likely to be particularly unreliable.
I would like to see some information at the head of each entry, that gives some sort of indication of this - maybe a frequency of editing statistic (or content a stability rating).

Impeach Bush

This message is a reply to:
 Message 22 by Nighttrain, posted 12-26-2005 4:08 AM Nighttrain has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024