Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
1 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,902 Year: 4,159/9,624 Month: 1,030/974 Week: 357/286 Day: 0/13 Hour: 0/0


EvC Forum ⇒ Side Orders ⇒ Coffee House ⇒

Wikipedia - A general discussion of its validity

Thread ▼ Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Wikipedia - A general discussion of its validity
nator
Member (Idle past 2199 days)
Posts: 12961
From: Ann Arbor
Joined: 12-09-2001

Normal Thread Display
Message 26 of 40 (443469)
12-25-2007 7:57 AM 		Reply to: Message 25 by Minnemooseus
12-24-2007 8:52 PM

Re: The Wikipedia anti-careationism and anti-conservativism bias
quote:
Percy, the Wikipedia bias against creationism and conservatism is well established.
​
Would you say that there's a bias against flat-eathism, too?
This message is a reply to:
 Message 25 by Minnemooseus, posted 12-24-2007 8:52 PM Minnemooseus has not replied
Replies to this message:
 Message 27 by Buzsaw, posted 12-25-2007 10:54 AM nator has replied
 Message 28 by Buzsaw, posted 12-25-2007 10:58 AM nator has not replied
  
nator
Member (Idle past 2199 days)
Posts: 12961
From: Ann Arbor
Joined: 12-09-2001

Normal Thread Display
Message 31 of 40 (443630)
12-26-2007 7:39 AM 		Reply to: Message 27 by Buzsaw
12-25-2007 10:54 AM

Re: The Wikipedia anti-careationism and anti-conservativism bias
quote:
Are you denying the bias which I've already cited in the link which Moose provided?
​
On the whole, I think that Wikipedia science articles are biased in favor of reality.
This message is a reply to:
 Message 27 by Buzsaw, posted 12-25-2007 10:54 AM Buzsaw has not replied
  
Date format: mm-dd-yyyy
Timezone: ET (US)
  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024