Wikipedia is not a legitimate source. It is a public talk box. Anyone with a computer can contribute. The main reason it is not a legitimate source is because "article" authorship is anonymous, unprofessional and largely unreferenced. For all we know Britney Spears could have written articles on evolution and radio dating.
Much of their biographies of persons are pure and total slander or libel, especially persons who are thought to be antievolution and pro-Christian. We know Atheists and evolutionists run Wikipedia so this is expected.
For those who think the world of Wikipedia despite the above facts, here is a good taste of how bad this tabloid site is:
Eddie Nash - Wikipedia
According to John C. Holmes' second wife Laurie (aka Misty Dawn): "He (Eddie Nash) was an awful man... John told me he used to leave the bathrooms without toilet paper, then offer the young women cocaine if they'd lick his ass clean."
Nina Hartley - Wikipedia
Best Specialty Tape - BDSM for Nina Hartley's Private Sessions 13 (2005)
Best Specialty Tape - Spanking for Nina Hartley's Guide To Spanking (2005)
Best Supporting Actress - Video for The Last X-Rated Movie (1991)
Best Couples Sex Scene Film for Amanda By Night II (1987)
Best Couples Sex Scene - Video for Sensual Escape (1989)
Best Supporting Actress - Film for Portrait of an Affair (1989)
Best Actress - Video for Debbie Duz Dishes (1987)
Wikipedia is a tabloid representing the minds of ordinary persons, wholly unprofessional and anti-scholarly. I refuse to show examples of slander and libel of particular persons.
Ray
™ Version 4.2
