I just don't get this insistence on coming up with interpretations that contradict the traditional. Seems unnecessary and strained.
When these were found and interpreted, they were found to provide a context for John's life that made that found in the NT quite a bit more meaningful. Conjectural yes, as i said, but still supportive.
But I see no lack whatever in the Biblical context for John's life to begin with. I see it as completely meaningful as written. There is/was no need for any other context.
But this is post #300 for this thread and maybe that's enough said anyway.