|
Register | Sign In |
|
QuickSearch
Thread ▼ Details |
|
Thread Info
|
|
|
Author | Topic: Is it 'boring' being God? | |||||||||||||||||||||||
dorkfrommarn Inactive Member |
"But, WHY did He create us? What's the point? If He didn't create us, then we wouldn't need saving, Jesus wouldn't need to have died, we wouldn't have all the suffering and hardships of life if we didn't exist.
If He did create us with some of the traits of His mind then is it possible that He was bored and creation was for His entertainment?" It's part of his nature to want to reveal himself to others, this is where the trinity comes in. basically he can reveal himself to himself. this goes for glorifying too. He just wants to reveal himself to more people. "He not only created Satan, but he created all the fallen angels the beings many consider to be the demons of Satan of which the Bible speaks, both OT and NT. The OT refers to them as evil spirits. Why create them though, what is the point?" the point is to give us a desision, serve him or satan.its like the difference between a slave and someone who helps you because they love you. "so free will in Ruth is really quite stifled." no, we always have a choice. a lot of the time good one is the sensible one . and who are you gonna want in charge, someone who barely knows a thing(humans) or someone who knows everything there is to know(God). "I honestly have great difficulty in comprehending how anyone can possibly want to worship such an evil being. A being that has no problem writing off 6 million Jews as part of a plan! This is absolutely horrendous buz, are you sure Lucifer got kicked out of heaven?"This is prolly the number one miscommunication between christians and others. WE MAKE THE CHOICES, GOOD OR BAD!!!! sorry, just wanted to make sure my point got across . God uses those choices. He did not make Hitler kill all the jews, he used Hitlers sin for good. Thats not evil. the simplest organisms are the most likely to survive. stupid people are survivors
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
dorkfrommarn Inactive Member |
uhhhhhhh.....interesting perpective...I guess .
But anyway, what would he do with those who were following faithfully? and God created us perfectly, I don't think God could change anything with how he created us and still be himself. the simplest organisms are the most likely to survive. stupid people are survivors
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
dorkfrommarn Inactive Member |
God actually did create us perfect
He created us in his own image
but we sure didn't stay that way.
A bit of a disappointment then, isn't it? Being omnipotent and having only one option?
eh, whatever
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
dorkfrommarn Inactive Member |
Brian writes:
I'm just assuming God is perfect, and a perfect being can't create something that is imperfect. We made the choice, with temptation but we still did. Hi Dork, Have you got a reference for this please, or is it your own opinion?
Edit: no I don't have a reference, like I said I'm just assuming This message has been edited by dorkfrommarn, 01-31-2006 02:08 PM
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
dorkfrommarn Inactive Member |
quote:actually it's having all the omni's quote:sorry, when I say can't I mean won't quote:what information? quote:where does it contradict me. morally perfect.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
dorkfrommarn Inactive Member |
Hey,
Brian writes: I think that is what 'perfect' means when referring to a god. Sorry, most of the people I talk to refer to perfect the way I mean.
Brian writes: No probs, but why do you arrive at this conclusion? I think It's part of the society I grew up in. A lot of times people will say "cant" instead of "wont" since from a personal perspective can get confusing. Aorry if that didn't make any sense, I'm really tired right now.
Brian writes:
for an example lets say you tell a child not to do something, but they don't understand why because they wouldn't understand it. We are infinitely more ignorant than God, so there's a lot that he doesn't tell us yet. I think God made it pretty clear that bad things were going to happen if Adam & Eve had disobeyed.
The meaning of good and the meaning of evil are two pretty big factors in the Fall. Neither Adam nor Eve knew that disobeying God was a bad thing since they didn't know what bad was until after they ate the fruit from the tree of knowledge of Good and Evil. There is also the problem of whether or not they knew what 'die' meant as well. Brian writes: God saw all that he had made, and it was very good. And there was evening, and there was morning”the sixth day. It was "very good", which isn't the same as perfect. I don't think he was talking about morally perfect. and also there's the fact that back when this was writen "very good" could have mean't the same thing perfect, just a thought because of the language differences.
Brian writes: nathan writes: morally perfect. Yet they were created with the ability to tell lies and disobey? God has the ability too, Jesus was tempted by satan. The difference is God is more powerful than satan, so he was able to resist him. This message has been edited by dorkfrommarn, 02-01-2006 04:45 PM This message has been edited by dorkfrommarn, 02-02-2006 02:12 AM
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
dorkfrommarn Inactive Member |
where did it say adam and eve knew what would happen? god says they would die if they ate from the tree, the text doesn't say they knew death, or right from wrong, and by the way what does the first part of this paragraph have to do with anything? I didn't say that they knew what death was. And second I was giving an illustration to show why God didn't tell Adam and Eve why they weren't supposed to eat from the tree.
or maybe the writers wouldn't call it perfect?, what fact? its not a fact unless you can back it up Look at my first sentence again, you just agreed with me. and I am sorry about saying "fact" that way, I exagerate like that sometimes. But please be more polite when telling someone they've missused a word, It's really not that big of a deal. And also you'll see in that sentence I used "could have" not did.
and this has what to do with what brian asked?, if adam and eve could lie or obscure the truth then they were not created morally perfect, but human like everyone else on the subject of perfection in speaking of god, no religion i've heard of was proud of flaws in thier gods, every god i've read about is perfect to the worshipers, but i could consider the christian/jewish god a meglomaniac In the begining Adam and Eve had the choice. They were not bound to anything. But humans today are bound to satan by birth. Thats the difference. I said God could, not did. thats like saying being able to murder and murdering are the same thing. And if I missunderstood you, then sorry.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
dorkfrommarn Inactive Member |
Hey people,
I think that God is not bored, because of the trinity he has relationships with parts himself; confusing, yes . The reason for creating humans was to have more people to glorify him, he's an egomaniac; but the only one with the right to be I didn't read it all the way through, but this looks like a good definition of the Trinity, if you have any questions ask the people who wrote the article because they sure know more than me This message has been edited by dorkfrommarn, 02-02-2006 02:27 AM This message has been edited by dorkfrommarn, 02-02-2006 02:30 AM This message has been edited by dorkfrommarn, 02-02-2006 02:32 AM
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
dorkfrommarn Inactive Member |
But they didn't understand the choices they made, so it would be like giving a baby a loaded weapon, they didn't realize that if they chose wrong they would suffer for it, as for being bound to satan if we have choice then we arn't bound to anything And although God didn't tell Adam and Eve why he didn't want them to eat the apple, but he did make sure they knew that he didn't.We do have free will but the sin of past generations has made it so satan has more and more power to influence us. but instead of bound to satan I guess "his influence is stronger over us" would be much better.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
dorkfrommarn Inactive Member |
hehe, no prob
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
dorkfrommarn Inactive Member |
So a person sitting around watching reruns of crappy reality tv programs is getting close to God? I don't know if he's bored, but I'd be. I think that the reason God is not bored is mainly because he gets to glorify himself (made possible by the trinity) for all eternity. he doesn't entertain himself with anything we do but glorify him. this is because if were not glorifying him then chances are we're sinning, which he doesn't like.I think in one of my previous posts I gave a link to a good explanation of the trinity.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
dorkfrommarn Inactive Member |
So a person sitting around watching a mirror and sometimes glancing at reruns of crappy reality tv programs is getting close to God? Still not too exciting to me. a mirror that reflects an infinitely great person and a great tv show full of (mostly) people praising him is more like it. I seriously doubt God is bored This message has been edited by dorkfrommarn, 02-14-2006 07:20 AM
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
dorkfrommarn Inactive Member |
How can he be infinitely great if there are people that don't like him, and entities that he must fight but cannot destroy? first of all, a human's opinion in the matter of God being infinitely great has absolutely nothing to do in the matter. God can and will destroy those who oppose him, he's giving them a choice.
Less than half the world's population is Xian, though I suppose if you include all monotheists it may be that way. It certainly wasn't that way for a long time. In any case our antics will be the same as seen on any reality program. The best you have added is an evangelist bible program. I was exagerating to make a point. Obviously you don't understand what I am saying. God delights in those who praise him THAT is part of his "entertainment". It is in no way related to any reality program.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
dorkfrommarn Inactive Member |
Perhaps you can explain how something can be infinitely great, if a portion (not matter how small) thinks it is not great. By definition that would put a limit on its greatness, and so it is not infinite in its greatness. Killing the outliers changes nothing. I don't see how any number of imperfect persons' opinions can change a fact.
I thought vanity or pride were deadly sins? Thats only for us, because we aren't perfect. When you're perfect feel free to be as prideful as you want.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
dorkfrommarn Inactive Member |
Infinite by definition has no end. As soon as one person does not think you are great, that would by definition create a limit on how great you are. Clearly you could be greater if that one person thought you were great as well. if you have a gun and someone thinks you don't know how to shoot doesn't affect whether you can shoot or not. opinion does not limit or define fact in any way
So when you are imperfect you are held to a higher standard than those who are perfect? I don't know why, but that seems like an imperfection. I've never enjoyed people that love sycophants, your God sounds like a preening asshole (e.g. a megalomaniac tv star or something). The reason that we cannot be prideful is because when we are we lie to ourselves and to others about how good we are. And Because God is infinite he cannot think of himself greater than he is
that would by definition create a limit on how great you are.
Definition of infinite This message has been edited by dorkfrommarn, 02-15-2006 06:16 AM
|
|
|
Do Nothing Button
Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved
Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024