Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 59 (9164 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,925 Year: 4,182/9,624 Month: 1,053/974 Week: 12/368 Day: 12/11 Hour: 0/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Judaism - True or False Religion?
macaroniandcheese 
Suspended Member (Idle past 3959 days)
Posts: 4258
Joined: 05-24-2004


Message 10 of 116 (286647)
02-14-2006 6:49 PM
Reply to: Message 1 by purpledawn
02-14-2006 9:43 AM


it's not like the talmud is a singular, goaled document. it's a collection of the musings and theories of disparate rabbis. it's like a research periodical. it's like someone wrote down the sermons of a bunch of christian preachers and put it in a book. now, one preacher might be baptist and one might be episcopalian and no one will agree that they are both right, but it might constitute the church government once the topics have become so old that they are no longer controversial.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by purpledawn, posted 02-14-2006 9:43 AM purpledawn has not replied

  
macaroniandcheese 
Suspended Member (Idle past 3959 days)
Posts: 4258
Joined: 05-24-2004


Message 36 of 116 (287136)
02-15-2006 8:56 PM
Reply to: Message 34 by Faith
02-15-2006 12:48 PM


Re: Back to Dispensationalism again
HE MOST CERTAINLY WAS!!! For heaven's sake, this ought to be OBVIOUS to a Christian.
no. paul condemns jews. jesus celebrated passover. jesus was very much still a jew. paul is the one who denies the old law.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 34 by Faith, posted 02-15-2006 12:48 PM Faith has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 39 by Faith, posted 02-15-2006 9:54 PM macaroniandcheese has replied

  
macaroniandcheese 
Suspended Member (Idle past 3959 days)
Posts: 4258
Joined: 05-24-2004


Message 40 of 116 (287146)
02-15-2006 10:07 PM
Reply to: Message 39 by Faith
02-15-2006 9:54 PM


Re: Back to Dispensationalism again
that is not precisely determined. he did not list out his personal practices. further, he is the one responsible for ignoring dietary restrictions and downplaying the covenant of circumcision. but he does make it a great point to address other "abominations". it is not only modern christians who pick and choose the laws they choose to enforce.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 39 by Faith, posted 02-15-2006 9:54 PM Faith has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 41 by Faith, posted 02-15-2006 10:12 PM macaroniandcheese has replied

  
macaroniandcheese 
Suspended Member (Idle past 3959 days)
Posts: 4258
Joined: 05-24-2004


Message 42 of 116 (287151)
02-15-2006 10:18 PM
Reply to: Message 41 by Faith
02-15-2006 10:12 PM


Re: Back to Dispensationalism again
the problem is that the old testament doesn't require salvation. it requires faith and trust. the lord does not demand sacrifice. the old testament describes a few people as being perfect and righteous. these are noah and david and some others i believe. these particular individuals are guilty of sexual sin but not of any codal law so far as the word lists. and yet god describes them as perfect. why? because they loved the lord wholly and trusted him unquestioningly always turning to him when they discovered themselves in error or in trouble. and yet christians are so very concerned with sacrifice and perfection when the listing of the christian creed is that all you are required is love and trust. i find it all very disturbing and continously more off-putting.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 41 by Faith, posted 02-15-2006 10:12 PM Faith has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 43 by Faith, posted 02-15-2006 10:22 PM macaroniandcheese has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024