Blood of Jesus

I just now saw this thread, so sorry this is 2 years late...the reason the slides are made with this Ultra-Darkfield Microscopic Image is to hide the fact that those "Somatid" that are being pointed to on Rivas's slides are probably just platelets.With the size of the WBC's and RBC's on a normal blood smear what he is pointing to as somatids is actually what size you would expect of platelets, what he points to as platelets the lower right object looks like it could be a platelet but the upper right mess is just a refractile object or smudge cell NOT a platelet...In my humble opinion as a medical technologist this is just a blood smear and when a blood smear is made, normally with wrights stain, you get the color of the cell as well as it's morphology, obviously rivas is just trying to decrease our ability to discern what is on this blood smear in hopes to fool his audience.

What BS? I'm just saying the objects in the blood smear are look nothing more than platelets. Than there is another image that I just saw on http://www.wyattmuseum.com/ark-of-the-covenant-07.htm that doesn't show one single cell next to these so called Somatids.It looks like these two images are from seperate samples, but who knows.

Oh...sorry, 14 hour shifts at night makes my thought process a little slow

The blood smear is pretty weak evidence...so where is the chromosomal study?Did you find any thing on his website other than a blood smear and ,what actually looks like a urine sample with bacteria in it, or was that the best Wyatt had to offer?

That's fine if you like what Wyatt's selling, but the OP is only questioning the lab test and results of Wyatt's blood of jesus find.Does Moller or others that you find credible have any other evidence besides Wyatt's? I only ask because I really don't know, and am curious to see other evidence.

Your beliefs in other claims made by Wyatt have little to do with the blood smear I'm referring to on his website. The legitimacy of his claims, I think, have been pretty well debunked but that still has little to do with the OP and my response on what the blood smear really shows us.

I'm lost, your defending Wyatt why? The blood smear he supplied on his video is pretty easy to discredit, he won’t show anybody else his evidence and you support him anyways? If your beliefs are similar to his how does that make what he says more credible? If someone with completely different religious beliefs as you came up with this I think you would see it for what it is.

Thanks Buz . I guess I just want to know if this is the crux of Wyatt’s work on the blood of Jesus find. It’s not much to go on and I would think there would be more than one photo of one slide made of something this significant.

That’s good you see through Wyatt’s BS, but I don’t see how blaming a lack of evidence on a website that Wyatt him self runs ties into a conspiracy of Jews in the government.

So just out of curiosity Buz, do those anti-Semitic remarks really have anything to do with bogus blood samples and the deception Wyatt and company have tried to pull over the general public.I also still don’t see the chromosomal study anywhere and that is just as easy to show a slide of as the blood smear. So once again, why the anti-Semitic remarks?

Why was he able to proceed with the evidence that he shows on his website if more evidence would result in death? Kind of makes the angels look impudent and careless for letting him get away with his first batch of evidence.

That’s funny... so god is limited to just blacking out photos but Wyatt can show the other meaningless crap on his website? He can’t have it both ways, either he has evidence and freely shows it or god is powerless and can’t stop him totally, just enough to make him look incompetent.

True, true . but what about Wyatt’s supporters that like to post how much evidence they have for his claims. Or even Wyatt’s colleague’s such as Moller who Buzsaw seem’s to think is more on the up and up.Both Nighttrain and Buzsaw have pointed to the exodus video as legit but still dodge the questions posted in the original OP for which most of us have asked for some type of reasoning for such poor evidence.

Well I appreciate that you at least took the time to investigate some of Wyatt’s claims and see them for what they are . I see it was nighttrain that believed Wyatt’s claims and wish he or someone from the Wyatt camp, maybe someone like Tennessee R, would like to comment.