True, true . but what about Wyatt’s supporters that like to post how much evidence they have for his claims. Or even Wyatt’s colleague’s such as Moller who Buzsaw seem’s to think is more on the up and up.
Both Nighttrain and Buzsaw have pointed to the exodus video as legit but still dodge the questions posted in the original OP for which most of us have asked for some type of reasoning for such poor evidence.
Evidence that is claimed, but never produced, year after year after year is no evidence at all.
Unless the evidence can be produced, and evaluated with objective analsysis, it is not real evidence at all.
One item that the 'psuedo-archelogists' will use is they go to a dig, find some old item, and declare it to be something of signifigence in the Bible. It might be nothign but an old pot of oil, or a mound of stones, but suddenly it becomes a temple artifact, or the evidence of the exodus. They then jealously guard their 'find', and refuse to let anybody subject it to objective analsysis.
After all, they don't want to be disallusioned, and find their old pottery shard is 1000 years newer from what they claim it is proof of.
Edited by ramoss, : No reason given.
™ Version 4.2
