Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
2 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,902 Year: 4,159/9,624 Month: 1,030/974 Week: 357/286 Day: 13/65 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   The definition of science: What should it be?
rgb
Inactive Member


Message 79 of 100 (327316)
06-28-2006 7:46 PM
Reply to: Message 67 by Rob
06-19-2006 11:14 PM


Rob writes
quote:
'True' morality is 'timeless' because it is 'real' and 'absolute', but I digress...
What the hell does this have to do with the definition of science?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 67 by Rob, posted 06-19-2006 11:14 PM Rob has not replied

  
rgb
Inactive Member


Message 87 of 100 (327389)
06-29-2006 4:02 AM
Reply to: Message 85 by Rob
06-29-2006 12:24 AM


Re: AHH NOT AGAIN
Rob writes
quote:
True science is not (in my opinion) material impericism, but metaphysical revelation.
I am speechless. Simply speechless.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 85 by Rob, posted 06-29-2006 12:24 AM Rob has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 89 by PurpleYouko, posted 06-29-2006 9:51 AM rgb has not replied
 Message 91 by Rob, posted 06-29-2006 10:21 AM rgb has not replied

  
rgb
Inactive Member


Message 95 of 100 (327491)
06-29-2006 12:56 PM
Reply to: Message 90 by Rob
06-29-2006 10:20 AM


Re: Empiricism versus Revelation
Rob writes
quote:
All of you are completely misunderstanding what I say...
Rob, most of us aren't English proficient enough to correctly comprehend fortune cookie language or to read people's minds.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 90 by Rob, posted 06-29-2006 10:20 AM Rob has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 98 by Rob, posted 06-29-2006 8:43 PM rgb has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024