Creationism museum opens in Alberta

quote:

---

Stay on topic or risk the wrath of the admins.

​

[edit] Oops! Too late! Admins got here first!

---

Right, but notice that they dealt with the FSM!!! Is that OK with you??

I don't know, I said it 'may' be lacking, or something like that. But If I do find something, you likely will find it off topic.

quote:

---

then bring the evidence in, you expect us to do your homework for you? Read RAZD's thread, (It just keeps adding up -- the earth is OLD. (Message 1 of Thread Age Correlations and an Old Earth: Version 1 No 3 (formerly Part III) in Forum Dates and Dating)), and discuss/refute the evidence he has presented with some of your own.

---

The evidence is more than the confines of the science threads on this forum allow. All that goes on there is a show trial, with selected evidence allowed. Besides, this thread apparently has to keep a narrow focus, about museums. Guess that means it is done. It is only the ideas behind why they exist that are worth discussing.

quote:

---

Then join the debate, staying out of it and lobbing tomatoes isn't doing your side any good.

​

As for the topic of this thread: Living in Alberta I've seen many letters to the editor of my local paper about this "museum". All the creationism supporters have are the same old debunked arguements and reccomend spokespeople/hucksters like convicted tax cheat Kent Hovind.

---

Well too bad, we are not allowed to discuss them here.

Didn't you just say it wasn't what you thought that mattered? Just the admins? Well, how is it you think you can wander around as you wish in the discussing of ideas, when you seem to think no one else can?

quote:

---

Any scientific evidence is allowed in the science threads, bring it over and let it stand on its merits.

---

What does that have to do with the museum?? Why sell other parts of a forum here on this thread??

quote:

---

Which is why I have linked to RAZD's It just keeps adding up -- the earth is OLD. (Message 1 of Thread Age Correlations and an Old Earth: Version 1 No 3 (formerly Part III) in Forum Dates and Dating) thrice now.

---

Maybe some day I might start a thread in the coffee house on that stuff. AS I say, I am not interested in a mock trial, where the truth is not invited, and the only evidence dealt with is natural.

If I was to look at that, I would not discuss it in the confines of a kangaroo court style setting. I prefer to have more flexibility to look at all evidences, including things this forum does not consider science.

No.

quote:

---

Presumably you give equal recommendations for UFO museums?

​

and anything else that fits the faith category of knowledge... with no critical review for any actual facts.

​

Enjoy.

---

Well, don't get too cocky, after all, how many facts does man have the power to review, or even access to??

quote:

---

I'm now not even sure who is defending what side of the argument.

​

A scientific museum deals with matters of science. Maybe you should bring your "things that this forum does not consider science" to a new "Proposed New Topics" topic.

​

Again, I'm not focusing this on just Keys.

​

Adminnemooseus

---

No worries, I am aware of the limitations of this part of the forum, and plan to act accordingly. Edited by keys, : No reason given.

quote:

---

Creationism is on topic, IF it connects up with the creationism museum concept. Basicly, if it wouldn't be found in the museum, then it's off-topic.

---

OK, getting back on topic, I noticed this exhibit from the creation museum. (I will remind people that I wanted this in the coffee house, someone bumped it here, don't blame me) [/quote]http://studentweb.eku.edu/zachary_lynn/museum/index.html
This is some of the biblical related content to what is in the museum.Edited by keys, : No reason given.Edited by keys, : No reason given.Edited by keys, : No reason given.

quote:

---

The Coffee House is for topics not related to creation vs evolution.

​

The science fora are for debates on science issues.

---

OK, so, are you suggesting that the more important aspects of what the creation museum covers, that are not limitable to science somehow should not have been bumped here?? Better take it up with whoever did that, how could I help you there??
If your point is that you think it fits neither here nor there, nor anywhere, fine, I can close the thread, and open one next time that tries to avoid the creation issue. Edited by keys, : No reason given.

You have access to no such facts. Your cult insult is noted, as is your cultish opinion. Neither do I care who you think looks stupid, because I think you ought to be looking inwards for that sort of thing.

I would hope so, since, of course the bible says we could communicate with animals.

Here is what Jar said
"But it is only the members that have a picayune bling-bling pimp-daddy of a god. The preachers and teachers and pastors and ministers and padres and priests and other charlatans who are getting rich off the membership of the Christian Cult of Ignorance,
It does make Christians look really stupid,.."
-JarYou say "In addition, no one was calling you the stupid one." Wrong! You insult my friends, YOU insult me. Consider this reported, Nosy. Edited by keys, : No reason given.

Care to stop advertising other thread? I have NO interest in what you want to define as science, or posting in a kangaroo court set up I feel is extremely biased. Thanks anyhow.