i don't think evolution really fits in to the big bang, which is the forum i used (Big Bang, Cosmology) as the universe is not alive so i used naturalism (everything happening naturally. If i am mistaken well sorry.
As to the undertones to cosmology the scientific study of the origin and structure of the universe. they are not really undertones this Universe is a largely a vacuum and many would argue that a vacuum has nothing in it. I however say that nothing cannot exist.
To Creationism versus Evolution If one would argue that nothing existed before the universe, since nothing begets nothing i would say that in effect that person was aknowledging the need for a Creator.
"This forum is to debate evolution vs. creationism. Naturalism vs. creationism is some sort of side issue."
Are we supposed to talk about the universe or Evolution In the Cosmology section of this forum? AS Evolution and Cosmology are different topics It would only be natural to talk about Cosmology in the Cosmology section. What is this some kind of weird test to see if i can Argue. Unless The website I see is completely different than the one you see than I am right.
{BY EDIT - To help with readibility, I took the liberty of adding blank lines between what I interpreted to be paragraphs - Nothing else was changed - Adminnemooseus}
[This message has been edited by Adminnemooseus, 06-12-2003]