Okay, is there any transitional evidence for the eyelid or any other of modern mans parts or functions?
Go back and read the rest of the thread. We already went over some of the evolutionary precursors to eyelids, and the fact that humans still have the vestigial remnants of the nictitating membrane.
As for other transitional evidence:
ALL features of
all species are transitional. They exist between their ancestors and their descendants, and their features will be slightly different versions from both, the differences growing with further separation.
Humans, for example have features like the appendix - a vestigial remnant of the cecum, which helped our distant evolutionary ancestors digest cellulose (in other words, they were herbivores and could eat things like grass). In us, the appendix serves no real function, and is actually detrimental due to its habit of becoming infected. But it's the same feature, slightly modified for many, many generations until its original purpose is completely unnecessary.
We also have a vestigial tail.
If evolution is true, then all features of all species must be a modified version of the same feature on another pre-existing species. it doesn't have to do the same job, but it has to be the same feature. And this is
exactly what we see. No features are unique, they are only modified versions of the same feature we see in other species.
Every time a fundy breaks the laws of thermodynamics, Schroedinger probably kills his cat.