Does the evidence support the Flood? (attn: DwarfishSquints)

It's not the end of the story. Demonstrate why there should be a
single homogeneous layer of sediment or concede that a flood was possible.

Why would I want to get myself a geology text book? So I can learn to conform, and not have to think for myself? Ok, now take your glass of water add a mixture of all minerals, ores, rocks, bones and tip it out down your driveway. Do we end up with a homogeneous layer of silt? No.Just give me some convincing evidence that disqualifies a global flood.

Who appointed the time?
Have you found any erosional discontinuities within the last 10 thousand years?

So it's more important to conform and fill your head with garbage, than it is to think for yourself.What happened to the real scientists? Genetics will shed light on human ancestral history.Edited by LucyTheApe, : No reason given.

No I didn't you just beat my edit to post.
The way I see it is that genetics should teach us a lot about our history.
I don't understand though, according to genetics, we are all derived from one Y male and one mitochondrial female. So how do we tell if a bottleneck has occurred if we all have the same genes? Do we contain somewhere in our genes all the alleles for every possible physical trait?

Give it a couple of years and it will look like this.
This town was under water a couple of years ago.

Ok. I'll have to do some reading to get an understanding of bottlenecks.However, if what I read is speculative, say to three degrees of 95% probability, ie (A_p(B_p(C_p))) where C is dependent on B which is dependent on A, then to me it just becomes junk I reject it and I'll wait for the geneticists.

BottlenecksMossie parasiteNot surprising that mossies would have a field day after the flood.TB Interesting conclusions2006Cat ParasiteHuman bottleneck. very interestingCS your bottlenecks are nothing more than a deliberate diversion. We can have as much mantle exposed as we need to vaporise just as much of the ocean that we need to raise the temperature just enough to melt the ice and make it rain just enough.I wans't there I didn't see it. I'm just interested to know if it was possible.But the brain dead scientists are drowning in their own irony.Moose you should suspend yourself for breaking rules 2, 8 and10Edited by LucyTheApe, : grammar

G'day Granny, No need to apologize Granny, I personally thought it was funny, "Blunt head trauma", I'll have to use that on some of my mates. Moose was a bit quick on the mouse I think. Anyway welcome back. Consider the diagram below.

In the first case the hammer is sitting on top of a raised plane. Regardless of how fast the water rose, the forces acting on the hammer will cancel themselves out. The same when the water recedes.In the second case the hammer should be dragged down by rapidly receding water due to the force of gravity pulling the water and the hammer in one direction, down.Your boulder.

d=CAv² (approx)Where the drag d is a product of some coefficient C (dependent on, among others, solids in the water), the area of the object A, and the speed of the water v²Notice that the speed of the water has an exponential effect on drag, that is, the increase in the speed of the water results in an exponential increase in the drag effect. That's why they can land things on Mars even though the atmosphere there is much thinner than earths,(I'm not mentioning the supposed moon landings with NO atmosphere?? Maybe another thread).In the boulder diagram the forces acting on the boulder are much greater, both d and g (mass*gravity) than the forces acting on the hammer. The boulder would move much more easily than the hammer. But given enough speed in the water, it will move a mountain.Edited by LucyTheApe, : No reason given.Edited by LucyTheApe, : grammar

Ok Nuggin, now sweep up the junk, hire some earth moving equipment, dig up your driveway, the dirt, the clay, the sand and the bedrock. Now put it all in the glass of water and tip it out down a slope. Now do a cross section.

Let's establish whether a flood was possible or not and whether the evidences supports it before we get down to the specifics. If the flood was not possible, its timing makes no sense.Have you been hibernating Nuggin, the bible is NOT the only source of data for the Flood.Edited by LucyTheApe, : added

You don't know that Nuggin. "Race" is a concept dreamt up by people that wanted to put themselves on the top of the evolutionary ladder. There's only one race, the "Human Race". Are you saying that we don't have the ability to adapt, create new enzymes and other proteins? I would give more credence to the body rearranging its genetic dynamics than the absolutely ridiculous mechanism of "Random mutation". Bottlenecks, whether they seem to exist or not, tell us nothing. Read up on it. Just another theory. I agree the story is a myth; doesn't make it wrong.

Granted, I should think a bit more before posting.Edited by LucyTheApe, : tag