The vast majority of the traditional media folks come from only one side.
Is it any wonder that the other side feels there is a bias?
The vast majority of traditional scientists are evolutionists.
Is it any wonder that the other side feels there is a bias?
The whole job of a scientist is to find out accurate facts about science. When they notice that all creationist talking points are crap, then not only are they going to reject the talking points, they're going to think that if there was any merit at all to creationism they'd have some talking points that
weren't crap.
The whole job of a political journalist is to find out accurate facts about politics. When they notice that (let's be fair) 95% of conservative talking points are crap, then not only are they going to reject the talking points, they're going to think that if there was any merit at all to conservatism they'd have some talking points that
weren't crap.
This leaves you with non-"traditional" not-really-journalists like Glenn Beck and Rush Limbaugh, who don't feel any obligation to find out the facts and probably wouldn't be able to if they wanted to --- the Duanes Gish and Kents Hovind of the media.