Unintelligent design (recurrent laryngeal nerve)

Evidence please? {ABE}: I mean for the fact that if they would be going there directly, that we wouldn't be able to swallow or talk like we do now. Seeing as you have just asserted stuff here and not shown any evidence for these assertions, this conlcusion is invalid.Edited by Huntard, : clarity

Oh no mister, that's not how it works. You claim that if the laryngeal nerve wasn't wired the way it is now, we would have trouble speaking and swallowing. Now, either provide evidence this is the case, or admit you made that up (or somenone else did, and you just repeated it without checking). Don't shift the burden of proof, I made no claim, you did. I simply ask you to provide me evidence before I believe you.

Oh please. You will get our reaction as soon as you provide evidence. I'll tell you what I am thinking once you provide evidence. No, I'm not hiding something and no, I think you are dead wrong in fact. That's why I ask you for evidence.I must say you are doing a mighty fine job of not providing any evidence, that's for sure. Doesn't make your case look any better.Oh, and a free tip, use the "peek" button on the bottom right of this post to see how I dod that neat little quotebox.

Ok, thank you for your admission that you were talking from your ass. Even if it was a veiled one. The fact that we are evolutionists means we will absolutely be swayed by the evidence, we're not creationists afterall. But thanks again for admitting that you just made some shit up. Lying for jesus must be rewarded, right? Thank you for that.

Shifting the topic are we? You're not a christian then? Ok, lying is rewarded, right? I'm not asking for proof, I'm asking for evidence. Please show that if the laryngeal nerve is wired differntly, speaking and swallowing problems arise. How hard can that be? There must be some individuals in which it doesn't run the way it does with the rest of humanity (check out Wounded King's post), do they have trouble spkeaing or swallowing? No it isn't. No, they remain unanswered becasue you haven't got any. Ah well, another one bites the dust. But after your very first post? That's pretty bad, man.

We don't have to, you haven't even shown that your claims are true. Really? That's the best you can com up with? Whatever makes you think I would ever abuse one of your sources? If they show me evidence that your claim is true, I will regard them as reliable on this matter, that is all. Now, of course, you don't have any sources, but that's another matter. You don't have any data, that much is clear. Of course. The fact that you have nothing has nothing to do with it. On the one hand we have someone making blind assertions left and right, and when asked for evidence, instead of providing it dodges and weaves so much that it is clear he hasn't got any. On the other hand we have people who recognized this fact and replied accordingly.I think the outcome is pretty clear.

No, but you could tell us in your own words what it says and link to the original. At least then you can show that you're not just asserting this for which there is no evidence.

Weaving and dodging...You really don't want to provide any source, do you?Ah well, everytime you refuse to do so, it becomes more and more clear you just copied something from a creationist webiste and didn't check it, or that you made something up. So all I have to say is: "Keep it up! Show the world that creationism hasn't got anything to stand on!"Oh, and Catholic Scientist has found a source that completely contradicts you!Now what?

You really have absolutely no clue how this works, do you?

Laryngeal tension is not tension in the laryngeal nerve, you dolt.

Yes, that's because injured nerves can't transmit signals effectively anymore, making control of the mmuscles difficult, leading to these problems.Again, this says nothing about your claims. If you would finally give some refferences than we could stop doing that.So far, everything you have said is wrong.

For this I'd need a source, I'd need to read the context. But I'm not gonna get any, am I? {ABE}: Found the article this comes from. Guess what, that is not about the laryngeal nerve, furthermore, it doesnt mean "tight 'nerves" like you do, and even if it did, it says tight nerves are a problem not a benefit.Once again you have been shown to be utterly and completely worng. What articles, scientists and experts? I haven't seen any. I've only seen you assert some things. Some things that are comletely wrong.Edited by Huntard, : Added {ABE} bit

Yeah found it, it doesn't say anything that can even remotely be used to support his position. But thanks mate.

We shouldn't have to. You made no contribution, apart from "quoting" articles that don;t support your claims in the slightest. Got any real evidence, or would you care to retract?

Uhm... yes? No I'm not. Where did I say this? This does not happen constantly, just when needed. No, since it's not happening constantly. This is self contradictory. Either nerves and muscles are tense (what is a "tense nerve"anyway?), or they are relaxed, they can't be both at the same time.