Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 59 (9164 total)
4 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,929 Year: 4,186/9,624 Month: 1,057/974 Week: 16/368 Day: 16/11 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   When does design become intelligent? (AS OF 8/2/10 - CLOSING COMMENTS ONLY)
Dr Adequate
Member (Idle past 315 days)
Posts: 16113
Joined: 07-20-2006


Message 391 of 702 (570960)
07-29-2010 2:13 PM
Reply to: Message 388 by ICANT
07-29-2010 2:02 PM


Re: When it comes to Information there is always a big question... how do you measure it?
Can those programs be created without a program running that was written by an intelligent being?
No, of course not.
Who designs the programs that are produced by genetic programming?
So what I was saying was that if the information and processes were like the bios in the computer everything could be done without any further interaction.
I still don't see your point.
Lets see it is absolutely true that a computer can not operate without intelligent design of machine and programs.
But it is irrelevant to that same computer producing a program.
That don't compute.
It's irrelevant to the question of whether an unintelligent process can produce a computer program. It can.
What can a computer do that it is not running a program to do?
That has nothing to do with what I wrote.
Irrelevant to what.
Irrelevant to whether unintelligent processes produce information.
For any DNA information to begin to exist:
It would first require a place to exist.
That life form would have to first began to exist.
But if all the DNA information for that life form to exist was encoded in its DNA, then how could that entity begin to exist?
Where did the DNA information come from to build the first life form?
What makes you think that the first life-form was DNA based?
Interestingly, we can observe self-replicating computer programs arise from random code and then evolve to be better adapted for reproduction. No intelligent designer, of course, is required to intervene in this process.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 388 by ICANT, posted 07-29-2010 2:02 PM ICANT has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 403 by ICANT, posted 07-29-2010 3:20 PM Dr Adequate has not replied

jar
Member (Idle past 425 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 392 of 702 (570962)
07-29-2010 2:17 PM
Reply to: Message 390 by ICANT
07-29-2010 2:11 PM


Re: Antenna gains
ICANT writes:
Hi Huntard,
Huntard writes:
So, let me get this straight, when we simulate gravity, that's not proof gravity requires intelligence, yet when we simulate evolutionary processes, that is proof that evolutionary processes require intelligence.
Then please get it straight.
My post you quoted said:
quote:
But it does prove that intelligent design is required for you to be able to simulate gravity or anything else on a computer monitor screen.
That "anything else" includes your evolutionary processes.
Living critters are not on a computer.
No intelligence required for living critters.

Anyone so limited that they can only spell a word one way is severely handicapped!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 390 by ICANT, posted 07-29-2010 2:11 PM ICANT has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 404 by ICANT, posted 07-29-2010 3:23 PM jar has replied

Huntard
Member (Idle past 2326 days)
Posts: 2870
From: Limburg, The Netherlands
Joined: 09-02-2008


Message 393 of 702 (570963)
07-29-2010 2:18 PM
Reply to: Message 390 by ICANT
07-29-2010 2:11 PM


Re: Antenna gains
ICANT writes:
Then please get it straight.
My post you quoted said:
quote:
But it does prove that intelligent design is required for you to be able to simulate gravity or anything else on a computer monitor screen.
That "anything else" includes your evolutionary processes.
Let me get it straight.
You said:
ICANT writes:
But it does prove that intelligent design is required for you to be able to simulate gravity or anything else on a computer monitor screen.
Now, since it only proves you need it to simulate it, it also proves that evolutionary processes don't, by your own admission, need intelligence to operate.
Thank you, did you really need so many posts to agree with us?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 390 by ICANT, posted 07-29-2010 2:11 PM ICANT has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 405 by ICANT, posted 07-29-2010 3:27 PM Huntard has replied

ICANT
Member
Posts: 6769
From: SSC
Joined: 03-12-2007
Member Rating: 1.7


Message 394 of 702 (570964)
07-29-2010 2:20 PM
Reply to: Message 385 by Dr Adequate
07-29-2010 12:57 PM


Re: Antenna gains
Hi Dr,
Dr Adequate writes:
Therefore this fact is as irrelevant to the implications of the simulation as that the computer runs on electricity, or that it's sitting on a desk, or that it was made in China, or that it has a Microsoft operating system. No conclusions can be drawn from these irrelevant observations about the real process being simulated.
According to Wikipedia Simulation is the imitation of some real thing, state of affairs, or process.
I love to race Need For Speed and have been doing so since the first program came out.
But in reality the game is not the real thing.
It is simply what the team that wrote the program see as reality that they have programed into the race program.
The same goes for any simulation it is what the writers think reality is. And program the progame as such.
God Bless,

"John 5:39 (KJS) Search the scriptures; for in them ye think ye have eternal life: and they are they which testify of me."

This message is a reply to:
 Message 385 by Dr Adequate, posted 07-29-2010 12:57 PM Dr Adequate has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 395 by Huntard, posted 07-29-2010 2:36 PM ICANT has replied
 Message 397 by Dr Adequate, posted 07-29-2010 2:40 PM ICANT has replied
 Message 402 by ringo, posted 07-29-2010 3:03 PM ICANT has seen this message but not replied

Huntard
Member (Idle past 2326 days)
Posts: 2870
From: Limburg, The Netherlands
Joined: 09-02-2008


Message 395 of 702 (570967)
07-29-2010 2:36 PM
Reply to: Message 394 by ICANT
07-29-2010 2:20 PM


Re: Antenna gains
ICANT writes:
The same goes for any simulation it is what the writers think reality is. And program the progame as such.
Exactly, and in the case of the antennae design program, they programmed it like it is in reality, an unguided process that uses no intelligence whatsoever.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 394 by ICANT, posted 07-29-2010 2:20 PM ICANT has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 409 by ICANT, posted 07-29-2010 3:34 PM Huntard has not replied

ICANT
Member
Posts: 6769
From: SSC
Joined: 03-12-2007
Member Rating: 1.7


Message 396 of 702 (570968)
07-29-2010 2:36 PM
Reply to: Message 386 by Dr Adequate
07-29-2010 1:00 PM


Re: Antenna gains
Hi Dr,
Dr Adequate writes:
Who designed the antenna?
The program that was written by intelligent people.
Dr Adequate writes:
This is, of course completely untrue. If it was true, no-one would ever bother to write computer programs.
Are you saying computer programs are written by people who have no intelligence?
The computer would do nothing without the programs that run on them.
Dr Adequate writes:
Without intelligent input, yes. Without electricity, no.
Without a bios NO.
Without a operating systen NO.
Without a program to perform a specific task NO.
Without an intelligent designer NONE of those things would exist.
You could add all the electricity you wanted to but without a bios, operating system and program you would get NOTHING.
God Bless,

"John 5:39 (KJS) Search the scriptures; for in them ye think ye have eternal life: and they are they which testify of me."

This message is a reply to:
 Message 386 by Dr Adequate, posted 07-29-2010 1:00 PM Dr Adequate has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 419 by Dr Adequate, posted 07-29-2010 4:27 PM ICANT has replied

Dr Adequate
Member (Idle past 315 days)
Posts: 16113
Joined: 07-20-2006


Message 397 of 702 (570970)
07-29-2010 2:40 PM
Reply to: Message 394 by ICANT
07-29-2010 2:20 PM


Re: Antenna gains
According to Wikipedia Simulation is the imitation of some real thing, state of affairs, or process.
I love to race Need For Speed and have been doing so since the first program came out.
But in reality the game is not the real thing.
It is simply what the team that wrote the program see as reality that they have programed into the race program.
The same goes for any simulation it is what the writers think reality is. And program the progame as such.
And so in the case of genetic programming the computer scientists only know that they are simulating a natural process because biologists have proved that mutations exist in nature.
Even if they had not, a genetic algorithm would still be an unintelligent process which produces results which have the appearance of design without anyone actually designing the results. But of course biologists have proved that mutations occur in nature, a fact that I presume you will not deny.
Edited by Dr Adequate, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 394 by ICANT, posted 07-29-2010 2:20 PM ICANT has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 411 by ICANT, posted 07-29-2010 3:44 PM Dr Adequate has not replied

ICANT
Member
Posts: 6769
From: SSC
Joined: 03-12-2007
Member Rating: 1.7


Message 398 of 702 (570972)
07-29-2010 2:44 PM
Reply to: Message 389 by jar
07-29-2010 2:05 PM


Re: When it comes to Information there is always a big question... how do you measure it?
Hi jar,
jar writes:
You have been given this many, many times.
Information can begin to exist through errors and substitution filtered by natural selection.
If it is possible for information to begin to exist through errors and substitution filtered by natural selection that information could only come about by modification of existing information.
My question is how did the DNA information of how to build the first life form begin to exist. All the information to build a life form is contained in its DNA.
Which came first the life form containing the DNA information?
OR
The DNA information that produced the first life form?
God Bless,

"John 5:39 (KJS) Search the scriptures; for in them ye think ye have eternal life: and they are they which testify of me."

This message is a reply to:
 Message 389 by jar, posted 07-29-2010 2:05 PM jar has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 399 by New Cat's Eye, posted 07-29-2010 2:49 PM ICANT has replied
 Message 401 by jar, posted 07-29-2010 2:58 PM ICANT has replied

New Cat's Eye
Inactive Member


Message 399 of 702 (570974)
07-29-2010 2:49 PM
Reply to: Message 398 by ICANT
07-29-2010 2:44 PM


Re: When it comes to Information there is always a big question... how do you measure it?
Which came first the life form containing the DNA information?
OR
The DNA information that produced the first life form?
If you must draw a line between the first lifeform and its predicessor, then the DNA for that first lifeform would have been slightly different from the DNA contained in the thing that came before the first lifeform, thus the DNA would have came first.
Although, the first true lifeforms probably came before true DNA, but that is beside the point.
Edited by Catholic Scientist, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 398 by ICANT, posted 07-29-2010 2:44 PM ICANT has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 412 by ICANT, posted 07-29-2010 3:49 PM New Cat's Eye has replied

subbie
Member (Idle past 1286 days)
Posts: 3509
Joined: 02-26-2006


Message 400 of 702 (570975)
07-29-2010 2:57 PM
Reply to: Message 378 by ICANT
07-29-2010 11:27 AM


Re: Antenna gains
You obviously don't have the wit to understand the difference between the intelligence designing the program and the program running from that point on without any further input from intelligence.
I shall not waste any more of my time on you.

Ridicule is the only weapon which can be used against unintelligible propositions. Ideas must be distinct before reason can act upon them; and no man ever had a distinct idea of the trinity. It is the mere Abracadabra of the mountebanks calling themselves the priests of Jesus. -- Thomas Jefferson
For we know that our patchwork heritage is a strength, not a weakness. We are a nation of Christians and Muslims, Jews and Hindus -- and non-believers. -- Barack Obama
We see monsters where science shows us windmills. -- Phat
It has always struck me as odd that fundies devote so much time and effort into trying to find a naturalistic explanation for their mythical flood, while looking for magical explanations for things that actually happened. -- Dr. Adequate

This message is a reply to:
 Message 378 by ICANT, posted 07-29-2010 11:27 AM ICANT has seen this message but not replied

jar
Member (Idle past 425 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 401 of 702 (570976)
07-29-2010 2:58 PM
Reply to: Message 398 by ICANT
07-29-2010 2:44 PM


Re: When it comes to Information there is always a big question... how do you measure it?
ICANT writes:
If it is possible for information to begin to exist through errors and substitution filtered by natural selection that information could only come about by modification of existing information.
And?
ICANT writes:
My question is how did the DNA information of how to build the first life form begin to exist. All the information to build a life form is contained in its DNA.
The first life form likely did not use DNA.
And whatever was used by the first life form was built by just plain chemical reactions.
ICANT writes:
Which came first the life form containing the DNA information?
OR
The DNA information that produced the first life form?
Neither. Simple chemical reactions came before either of those.

Anyone so limited that they can only spell a word one way is severely handicapped!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 398 by ICANT, posted 07-29-2010 2:44 PM ICANT has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 415 by ICANT, posted 07-29-2010 4:09 PM jar has replied

ringo
Member (Idle past 443 days)
Posts: 20940
From: frozen wasteland
Joined: 03-23-2005


Message 402 of 702 (570978)
07-29-2010 3:03 PM
Reply to: Message 394 by ICANT
07-29-2010 2:20 PM


ICANT writes:
According to Wikipedia Simulation is the imitation of some real thing, state of affairs, or process.
Exactly. Intelligence can only simulate natural processes. Even if we found evidence of an Intelligence that designed all life on earth, it would only mean that He figured out how to imitate the natural processes.
Edited by Ringo, : Fixed quote.

Life is like a Hot Wheels car. Sometimes it goes behind the couch and you can't find it.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 394 by ICANT, posted 07-29-2010 2:20 PM ICANT has seen this message but not replied

ICANT
Member
Posts: 6769
From: SSC
Joined: 03-12-2007
Member Rating: 1.7


Message 403 of 702 (570979)
07-29-2010 3:20 PM
Reply to: Message 391 by Dr Adequate
07-29-2010 2:13 PM


Re: When it comes to Information there is always a big question... how do you measure it?
Hi Dr,
Dr Adequate writes:
Who designs the programs that are produced by genetic programming?
The program that was written by some intelligent person created the Genetic program.
A computer can not think.
A computer program can not think.
I have a program that can play poker and it is very good. It can decide when to fold, call, raise and bluff. It accomplishes that by processing information that is included in the program. Is the program perfect no. Is it better than a human yes. It is a great teaching tool to play against.
Can this program think? NO.
Can this program make decisions? Yes.
Dr Adequate writes:
It's irrelevant to the question of whether an unintelligent process can produce a computer program. It can.
Is that process produced by a running program?
OR
Does it begin to exist without a program running?
Dr Adequate writes:
Interestingly, we can observe self-replicating computer programs arise from random code and then evolve to be better adapted for reproduction. No intelligent designer, of course, is required to intervene in this process.
Where could I find this random code that could evolve into a program?
Is it included in a program designed and written by some intelligent being?
Is there someplace I could use this random code?
I have a random mutation generator on my computer and I can spend hours mutating "The quick black fox jumped over the lazy dog" and never get any sentence you can read that makes sense. Using the 44 characters in that sentence there are about as many combinations as there are particles in the entire universe. I can take those characters and create many different words that can be formed into different sentences but a little intelligence is required.
God Bless,

"John 5:39 (KJS) Search the scriptures; for in them ye think ye have eternal life: and they are they which testify of me."

This message is a reply to:
 Message 391 by Dr Adequate, posted 07-29-2010 2:13 PM Dr Adequate has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 468 by Blue Jay, posted 07-30-2010 3:06 PM ICANT has replied

ICANT
Member
Posts: 6769
From: SSC
Joined: 03-12-2007
Member Rating: 1.7


Message 404 of 702 (570980)
07-29-2010 3:23 PM
Reply to: Message 392 by jar
07-29-2010 2:17 PM


Re: Antenna gains
Hi jar,
jar writes:
No intelligence required for living critters.
Do human reproduction depend on information contained in the human DNA?
God Bless,

"John 5:39 (KJS) Search the scriptures; for in them ye think ye have eternal life: and they are they which testify of me."

This message is a reply to:
 Message 392 by jar, posted 07-29-2010 2:17 PM jar has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 406 by jar, posted 07-29-2010 3:33 PM ICANT has replied

ICANT
Member
Posts: 6769
From: SSC
Joined: 03-12-2007
Member Rating: 1.7


Message 405 of 702 (570981)
07-29-2010 3:27 PM
Reply to: Message 393 by Huntard
07-29-2010 2:18 PM


Re: Antenna gains
Hi Huntard,
Huntard writes:
Now, since it only proves you need it to simulate it, it also proves that evolutionary processes don't, by your own admission, need intelligence to operate.
Thank you, did you really need so many posts to agree with us?
Proving that intelligence is needed to simulate any kind of process does not prove the real thing needs it or not that is a different subject all together.
So no I have not agreed with you.
God Bless,

"John 5:39 (KJS) Search the scriptures; for in them ye think ye have eternal life: and they are they which testify of me."

This message is a reply to:
 Message 393 by Huntard, posted 07-29-2010 2:18 PM Huntard has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 408 by Huntard, posted 07-29-2010 3:34 PM ICANT has replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024