Hi tesla, long time no see.
You say ID is the recognition of balance in all things: but that is not what ID staes, is it?
ID states that the universe could not have arisen without a designer.
I agree that intelligence exists in our minds but this has not been shown to require intervention. The water in the puddle fits the puddle perfectly because of the nature of water and puddles: not that the ater is designed to fit the puddle.
A man can look at a computer and say that it is designed because it often has a lable saying 'made in China' (for example).
Nature has no such markers. Everything to date that has been put forwards as a marker for design has been debunked (blood clotting is a good example put forwards in 'Pandas and People'0.
Can you point to a marker of design in nature? If you can I'm all ears.
However, if you do not understand the microphone, how can you understand the reciever?
How can this be different to 'However, if you do not understand god, how can you understand god'?
Supernatural is just saying : "Nobody understands".
But this is not the case: the supernatural is saying: Nobody understands; therefor god. this is god of the gaps and fallacious.
Do you think my proposed experiment is an effective one?
You have proposed no experiment: what is the prediction and what is the experimental design? There is even no epistemological framework being used here apart from 'I believe what I believe'.